Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 07:30:44 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2017-12-11]Statement on Cryptocurrencies and Initial Coin Offerings (sec.gov)  (Read 2089 times)
vit05 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 526



View Profile
December 12, 2017, 02:47:03 AM
 #1

https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/statement-clayton-2017-12-11
1715196644
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715196644

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715196644
Reply with quote  #2

1715196644
Report to moderator
1715196644
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715196644

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715196644
Reply with quote  #2

1715196644
Report to moderator
1715196644
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715196644

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715196644
Reply with quote  #2

1715196644
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715196644
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715196644

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715196644
Reply with quote  #2

1715196644
Report to moderator
CryptoBry
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 355



View Profile
December 12, 2017, 02:56:16 AM
 #2

Quote
I believe that initial coin offerings – whether they represent offerings of securities or not – can be effective ways for entrepreneurs and others to raise funding, including for innovative projects.

I love reading that statement. It is actually fair and concise. Well, one of the reasons why SEC is strict in implementing laws on securities is the fact that if the ICO platform is left on its own there would be many scam artists that will get in and victimized innocent investors -- it has already happened actually. We have to also consider this very important job of this department. Now, if i may add, the problem here is that there is no clear regulatory framework yet from the SEC for those who wanted to legalize their ICO project. It would have been better if there would be an office specializing on scrutinizing and approving ICO projects (and have the cost imposed to the applicants). This is the best way to protect buyers of ICOs from being victimized.
jamids
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 252



View Profile WWW
December 12, 2017, 03:18:46 AM
 #3

It is good that they summarized the things that the investors should look into before investing their money because we cannot see who are we dealing with so it is a matter of trust. We should always do research and due diligence because there have been so many scam artists taking this opportunity so each one of us should help each other in knowing if the people behind the projects are legit or not. We know that there are fortunes to be made in investing in this projects but there is a possibility of losing it too and we can reduce the risk of losing by doing our part of dissecting the project first before putting our money into it.

bbc.reporter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 1442



View Profile
December 12, 2017, 03:39:21 AM
 #4

@CryptoBry. They really have no choice. They either need to adapt and make new laws to regulate the ICOs in the cryptospace, or stop it entirely which they know they cannot do. So I reckon they might choose the easier course hehehe.




███████████████████████████
███████▄████████████▄██████
████████▄████████▄████████
███▀█████▀▄███▄▀█████▀███
█████▀█▀▄██▀▀▀██▄▀█▀█████
███████▄███████████▄███████
███████████████████████████
███████▀███████████▀███████
████▄██▄▀██▄▄▄██▀▄██▄████
████▄████▄▀███▀▄████▄████
██▄███▀▀█▀██████▀█▀███▄███
██▀█▀████████████████▀█▀███
███████████████████████████
.
.Duelbits.
..........UNLEASH..........
THE ULTIMATE
GAMING EXPERIENCE
DUELBITS
FANTASY
SPORTS
████▄▄█████▄▄
░▄████
███████████▄
▐███
███████████████▄
███
████████████████
███
████████████████▌
███
██████████████████
████████████████▀▀▀
███████████████▌
███████████████▌
████████████████
████████████████
████████████████
████▀▀███████▀▀
.
▬▬
VS
▬▬
████▄▄▄█████▄▄▄
░▄████████████████▄
▐██████████████████▄
████████████████████
████████████████████▌
█████████████████████
███████████████████
███████████████▌
███████████████▌
████████████████
████████████████
████████████████
████▀▀███████▀▀
/// PLAY FOR  FREE  ///
WIN FOR REAL
..PLAY NOW..
aso118
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1012


★Nitrogensports.eu★


View Profile
December 12, 2017, 06:08:59 AM
 #5

It is good that regulators are trying to provide clarity to investor. Surprising that till date, no ICO has been registered with the SEC. They are doing the best they can, given that no national borders exist in the crypto world.
They have cracked down on a couple of ICOs and people who are thinking of raising money through an ICO and disappearing will think twice now.


           █████████████████     ████████
          █████████████████     ████████
         █████████████████     ████████
        █████████████████     ████████
       ████████              ████████
      ████████              ████████
     ████████     ███████  ████████     ████████
    ████████     █████████████████     ████████
   ████████     █████████████████     ████████
  ████████     █████████████████     ████████
 ████████     █████████████████     ████████
████████     ████████  ███████     ████████
            ████████              ████████
           ████████              ████████
          ████████     █████████████████
         ████████     █████████████████
        ████████     █████████████████
       ████████     █████████████████
▄▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██     
██
██
▬▬ THE LARGEST & MOST TRUSTED ▬▬
      BITCOIN SPORTSBOOK     
   ▄▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██     
██
██
             ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▄
     ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀        ▀▄▄▄▄           
▄▀▀▀▀                 █   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
█                    ▀▄          █
 █   ▀▌     ██▄        █          █               
 ▀▄        ▐████▄       █        █
  █        ███████▄     ▀▄       █
   █      ▐████▄█████████████████████▄
   ▀▄     ███████▀                  ▀██
    █      ▀█████    ▄▄        ▄▄    ██
     █       ▀███   ████      ████   ██
     ▀▄        ██    ▀▀        ▀▀    ██
      █        ██        ▄██▄        ██
       █       ██        ▀██▀        ██
       ▀▄      ██    ▄▄        ▄▄    ██
        █      ██   ████      ████   ██
         █▄▄▄▄▀██    ▀▀        ▀▀    ██
               ██▄                  ▄██
                ▀████████████████████▀




  CASINO  ●  DICE  ●  POKER   
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
   24 hour Customer Support   

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
illinest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 454
Merit: 251



View Profile
December 12, 2017, 07:41:05 AM
 #6


This statement goes much further than past statements/opinions. I have a feeling that the hammer is going to come down in the next couple months, and it won't be pretty. ICOs promoting securities to Americans and exchanges brokering sales of securities seem to be on the SEC's hit list. I found these statements particularly worrying:

Quote
Similarly, I also caution those who operate systems and platforms that effect or facilitate transactions in these products that they may be operating unregistered exchanges or broker-dealers that are in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


This definitely applies to Bitfinex (who only booted US customers last month), Poloniex and Bittrex. And they go even further to suggest that even cryptocurrencies (and not just ICO tokens) may be securities as well:

Quote
Before launching a cryptocurrency or a product with its value tied to one or more cryptocurrencies, its promoters must either (1) be able to demonstrate that the currency or product is not a security or (2) comply with applicable registration and other requirements under our securities laws.  Second, brokers, dealers and other market participants that allow for payments in cryptocurrencies, allow customers to purchase cryptocurrencies on margin, or otherwise use cryptocurrencies to facilitate securities transactions should exercise particular caution, including ensuring that their cryptocurrency activities are not undermining their anti-money laundering and know-your-customer obligations.[7]  As I have stated previously, these market participants should treat payments and other transactions made in cryptocurrency as if cash were being handed from one party to the other.

That statement is particularly chilling with regard to brokers like 1Broker/1Fox and SimpleFX, exchanges like those above and Shapeshift/Changelly, and maybe even payment processors like Bitpay. It's going to be an interesting several months as regulators start nosing around. Undecided
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!