Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 05:52:35 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin future - security options  (Read 850 times)
Galahad (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 190
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 29, 2013, 03:59:33 PM
 #1

After comparing all the different wallet choices I think the best bet is to go with blockchain.info with watch only (paper) addresses. This way thieves would have to physically break in and demand my private keys for my paper wallet. But I've been thinking about this and this isn't really ideal. What if in the future everyone is doing this and we all have paper wallets kicking about the place? What do we do:

1) Have safe deposit boxes, this will cost us around £300 a year. This would prevent coercion.
2) Trust banks to keep our keys safe? This scenario worries me but I don't know why.
3) Hide it, secure it better somehow. Still not going to stop someone.

Someone could break in and steal my money this way right now. But the bank will refund payments, but not with BTC.
1715147555
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715147555

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715147555
Reply with quote  #2

1715147555
Report to moderator
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715147555
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715147555

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715147555
Reply with quote  #2

1715147555
Report to moderator
1715147555
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715147555

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715147555
Reply with quote  #2

1715147555
Report to moderator
Chalkbot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1001



View Profile
July 29, 2013, 04:13:04 PM
 #2

Brainwallet!

http://brainwallet.org/


Unless you're prone to forgeting things....
AliceWonder
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 29, 2013, 04:52:16 PM
 #3

Hardware wallet.

The software client never has your private keys.

It creates the transaction, sends the transaction to the hardware wallet where it is signed and returned to the software client to go out on the network.

AFAIK Trezor is the only one and isn't shipping yet.

QuarkCoin - what I believe bitcoin was intended to be. On reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/
acoindr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1002


View Profile
July 29, 2013, 06:16:09 PM
 #4

After comparing all the different wallet choices I think the best bet is to go with blockchain.info with watch only (paper) addresses. This way thieves would have to physically break in and demand my private keys for my paper wallet. But I've been thinking about this and this isn't really ideal. What if in the future everyone is doing this and we all have paper wallets kicking about the place? What do we do:

1) Have safe deposit boxes, this will cost us around £300 a year. This would prevent coercion.
2) Trust banks to keep our keys safe? This scenario worries me but I don't know why.
3) Hide it, secure it better somehow. Still not going to stop someone.

Someone could break in and steal my money this way right now. But the bank will refund payments, but not with BTC.

The problem you're talking about is similar to when people traded gold nuggets etc. Someone could break in and steal whatever was hidden (under the mattress or whatever) so people started storing their gold with vaults and getting claim checks. Then people started trading the claim checks instead of the gold (since it was convenient) and that became modern paper money.

So there is still the problem of securing your money for yourself. I think people will again outsource this to some degree, and banks will hold bitcoins for them. The nice thing is that this time there is no need to start trading paper claim checks as a more convenient exchange mechanism.
Galahad (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 190
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 30, 2013, 08:26:51 AM
 #5

The problem you're talking about is similar to when people traded gold nuggets etc. Someone could break in and steal whatever was hidden (under the mattress or whatever) so people started storing their gold with vaults and getting claim checks. Then people started trading the claim checks instead of the gold (since it was convenient) and that became modern paper money.

So there is still the problem of securing your money for yourself. I think people will again outsource this to some degree, and banks will hold bitcoins for them. The nice thing is that this time there is no need to start trading paper claim checks as a more convenient exchange mechanism.

Learning things all the time here. So they had gold, then used paper money instead, then they stopped making the money gold-backed and forgot it was all about gold in the first place! I really hope that doesn't happen with Bitcoin.
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1005


Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952


View Profile
July 30, 2013, 08:46:43 AM
 #6

1) Have safe deposit boxes, this will cost us around £300 a year. This would prevent coercion.
2) Trust banks to keep our keys safe? This scenario worries me but I don't know why.
3) Hide it, secure it better somehow. Still not going to stop someone.

This problem has been already solved by somebody.

http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/plausible-deniability

Now they have to prove that you have a wallet at all first.


kik1977
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 593
Merit: 505


Wherever I may roam


View Profile
July 30, 2013, 09:46:28 AM
 #7

After comparing all the different wallet choices I think the best bet is to go with blockchain.info with watch only (paper) addresses. This way thieves would have to physically break in and demand my private keys for my paper wallet. But I've been thinking about this and this isn't really ideal. What if in the future everyone is doing this and we all have paper wallets kicking about the place? What do we do:

1) Have safe deposit boxes, this will cost us around £300 a year. This would prevent coercion.
2) Trust banks to keep our keys safe? This scenario worries me but I don't know why.
3) Hide it, secure it better somehow. Still not going to stop someone.

Someone could break in and steal my money this way right now. But the bank will refund payments, but not with BTC.

The problem you're talking about is similar to when people traded gold nuggets etc. Someone could break in and steal whatever was hidden (under the mattress or whatever) so people started storing their gold with vaults and getting claim checks. Then people started trading the claim checks instead of the gold (since it was convenient) and that became modern paper money.

There is even a step further: at some point the gold keepers (aka Goldsmiths) realised that it was extremely improbable that people storing their gold with them would have come all together to claim their gold back, since people had started trading the receipt of the gold deposited rather than gold itself. Therefore they begun issuing fake receipts (i.e. not supported by any deposit of gold) used to give loans to people for an interest. Fractional Reserve was born...   

We are like butterflies who flutter for a day and think it is forever
Hfleer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


Changing avatars is currently not possible.


View Profile
July 30, 2013, 10:02:42 AM
 #8

After comparing all the different wallet choices I think the best bet is to go with blockchain.info with watch only (paper) addresses. This way thieves would have to physically break in and demand my private keys for my paper wallet. But I've been thinking about this and this isn't really ideal. What if in the future everyone is doing this and we all have paper wallets kicking about the place? What do we do:

1) Have safe deposit boxes, this will cost us around £300 a year. This would prevent coercion.
2) Trust banks to keep our keys safe? This scenario worries me but I don't know why.
3) Hide it, secure it better somehow. Still not going to stop someone.

Someone could break in and steal my money this way right now. But the bank will refund payments, but not with BTC.

A brainwallet or semi-brainwallet can work, and you can even have part of it written down and remember the rest.

█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
▓▓▓▓▓  BIT-X.comvvvvvvvvvvvvvvi
→ CREATE ACCOUNT 
▓▓▓▓▓
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!