The question you gave really poked my curiosity...
Thank you, good to know my thinking finds response in other people's minds, so to speak )
You see what I mean, decentralization is just a tool selected by Satoshi to achieve independence from the government institutions. As for me, instead of "decentralization", which is just a tool, would be more correct to use "independence" word.
People need
independent currency, not necessarily
decentralized, isn't this assumption correct?
When Bitcoin whitepater was published, Tor/Onion services were in their infancy, not really widely used. Who knows, would Nakamoto selected onion routing to achieve
independence instead of decentralization otherwise?
Wouldn't such a currency be more
independend then some of the DAG based currencies from the top 50?