[Big Auction] Last Holiday Series Chips Set Sale

[Xboxthreefixme]

Auction for the FINAL 60 SETS of Holiday Chips ( 5 Chips in each set , 5 colors ), these chips sold like hotcakes & this auction is the LAST TIME you can purchase them    Hologram for each coin.



STARTING BID: 0.001BTC

MINIMUM BID INCREMENT: 0.001BTC

MULTIPLE SET BIDS

BID 1 SET @ .001BTC  BID 2 SETS @ .001BTC  ALL @ .004BTC  

END TIME: PLEASE VIEW TIMER https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=156&iso=20171215T21&year=2017&month=12&day=15&hour=21&min=0&sec=0&msg=Holiday%20Chips&csz=1
SNIPE: Any bid made in last 10 minutes will extend the auction 10 minutes beyond end time until no new bids are made.

We are part of the legendary Encyclopedia of Physical Bitcoins    https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1486405.220



Shipping:

US to US - 8$

US to International - Case by case basis



Payment Addresses :

 NON ESCROW : 16wXmFwun1oQfvbgnQn19vQC6QEwKAFMr2 *Same as before , will never change.

ESCROW : PLEASE USE AN ESTABLISHED ESCROW .

[ChiBitCTy]

5 @ .001BTC

[bavicrypto]

3 @ 0.001BTC

[tweetious]

1 SET @ .001B

[reagannn]

5 @ 0.001BTC

[topparked]

BID 2 SETS @ .001B

[ZeroGee]

bid 5 sets @ .001BTC

[Xboxthreefixme]

10 Hours Left.

Miner - 10 sets
Chibitcty - 5 sets
reagann - 5 sets
zerogee - 5 sets
bavicrypto - 3 sets
topparked - 2 sets
tweetious - 1 set
writingG - 1 set


 

[chronicsky]

10 sets @ 0.001

[wolfcoin2]

15 sets @ 0.001

[Xboxthreefixme]

45 minutes left.

57 of the 60 sets are bid on at .001 BTC .

Good luck everyone

[ZipReg]

10 @ .002BTC

[Xboxthreefixme]

Winners!  Priority went to those who ordered multiple sets.

Please send payment & shipping information.

Thank you, happy holidays!

Zipreg - 10 sets @ .002BTC = .02BTC
Wolfcoin - 15 sets @ .001BTC = .015BTC
Minerjones - 10 sets @ .001BTC = .01BTC
Chronicsky - 10 sets @ .001BTC = .01BTC
Chibitcty - 5 sets @ .001BTC = .005BTC
Reagann - 5 sets @ .001BTC = .005BTC
Zerogee - 5 sets @ .001BTC = .005BTC

[ZipReg]

So you're saying I could have bid 20 @ .001 still won for the same price and gotten double the chips? That is a flawed auction process man. The people who bid first should have priority over a higher quantity bid at the same price that was made later.

I should be on top of the list, then the 10 hour left list you posted with minerjones at top should fill out the rest below me, then you add the other who bid later after that regardless of quantity, because everyone under me bid the same price!

I'm not telling you how to run your auction, and I bid what I bid and will pay what I bid, but there is no logic in this system, what I outlined above is the logical and correct way to do it, with all due respect.

[Xboxthreefixme]

So you're saying I could have bid 20 @ .001 still won for the same price and gotten double the chips? That is a flawed auction process man. The people who bid first should have priority over a higher quantity bid at the same price that was made later.

I should be on top of the list, then the 10 hour left list you posted with minerjones at top should fill out the rest below me, then you add the other who bid later after that regardless of quantity, because everyone under me bid the same price!

I'm not telling you how to run your auction, and I bid what I bid and will pay what I bid, but there is no logic in this system, what I outlined above is the logical and correct way to do it, with all due respect.

*edited this because we said no first. Sorry , read it wrong. Yes you wouldve gotten double if you bid that.

Because its an auction. Higher bid will always win regardless if they ordered 1 or all.

the 10 hour list was just a list , wasnt in order.

[Hhampuz]

I'm going to have to agree that this ended a bit weird.. Since WritingG123 placed a bid of 1 set at 0.001 BTC and then wolfcoin made a bid of 15 sets at 0.001 BTC per set but his bid came in after WritingG123 placed his bid, so shouldn't wolfcoin get 14 sets and WritingG get his 1 set?

As previously stated it is your show but to me this seems odd..

[Xboxthreefixme]

I'm going to have to agree that this ended a bit weird.. Since WritingG123 placed a bid of 1 set at 0.001 BTC and then wolfcoin made a bid of 15 sets at 0.001 BTC per set but his bid came in after WritingG123 placed his bid, so shouldn't wolfcoin get 14 sets and WritingG get his 1 set?

As previously stated it is your show but to me this seems odd..

Weve got no problem doing 14 sets wolfcoin & 1 set  WritingG . if Wolfcoin would like to give one up.

Let us know.

Thanks!

[Hhampuz]

It's not about one user giving a set up or not it's about the auction not being clear with its rules..

Right now another guy is getting fucked as well that bid on 2 sets but you have decided to prioritize the people that bid on more sets.

You say that higher bid has priority, sure thing but don't make it an auction where people bid on individual items then as you basically held 60 auctions in one here..

[Xboxthreefixme]

It's not about one user giving a set up or not it's about the auction not being clear with its rules..

Right now another guy is getting fucked as well that bid on 2 sets but you have decided to prioritize the people that bid on more sets.

You say that higher bid has priority, sure thing but don't make it an auction where people bid on individual items then as you basically held 60 auctions in one here..

Everything was clear in the OP.

We have & many have done the same auction style.

Bids were received.

Thank you.

[Hhampuz]

It's not about one user giving a set up or not it's about the auction not being clear with its rules..

Right now another guy is getting fucked as well that bid on 2 sets but you have decided to prioritize the people that bid on more sets.

You say that higher bid has priority, sure thing but don't make it an auction where people bid on individual items then as you basically held 60 auctions in one here..

Everything was clear in the OP.

We have & many have done the same auction style.

Bids were received.

Thank you.

It is not clear in the OP, can you check it again to see that you are wrong please?

Nowhere did you state that "If you bid on several sets you have priority if you end up with the same price per set as a user with bids on less sets".