jedi95
|
|
July 13, 2011, 08:41:00 AM |
|
>I modified the shipping phatk Kernel from Phoenix 1.50. I now get round about 9-10 MHash/s more on my 5830 (up >from 310 to 319/320)!
I would really like to replicate this. Currently getting 310 Mh with 2.1 + 11.5 with bitless Ma() changes. Using the 7-11 I only get a small jump to 311. Can you share the config you use? sdk/driver version etc Thanks.
That might be tough since phatk doesn't work very well on older SDK versions. It was designed to be used with SDK 2.4, and on 2.1 I get better results with poclbm. The Ma() changes also apply to poclbm, so you won't see a gain there.
|
Phoenix Miner developer Donations appreciated at: 1PHoenix9j9J3M6v3VQYWeXrHPPjf7y3rU
|
|
|
Uzza
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
July 13, 2011, 11:54:08 PM Last edit: July 14, 2011, 09:42:39 AM by Uzza |
|
I just did a quick comparison against poclbm for me.
On my dedicated 5870: poclbm SDK 2.1: ~424 phatk SDK 2.1: <420 phatk imp SDK 2.1: ~432
poclbm SDK 2.4: <424 phatk SDK 2.4: ~424 phatk imp SDK 2.4: ~437
So on SDK 2.1 your improvements made it so phatk was better than poclbm in 2.1, and way better in 2.4.
The init optimizations gave me a minor boost of ~0.5 MHs over 2011-07-11.
|
|
|
|
PcChip
|
|
July 14, 2011, 02:03:05 AM |
|
Uzza, two questions:
1.) what is "phatk imp"
2.) Surely you meant a 5870 instead of a 4870? Either that or you must have four 4870's to hit 430 MH/s!
|
Legacy signature from 2011: All rates with Phoenix 1.50 / PhatK 5850 - 400 MH/s | 5850 - 355 MH/s | 5830 - 310 MH/s | GTX570 - 115 MH/s | 5770 - 210 MH/s | 5770 - 200 MH/s
|
|
|
CYPER
|
|
July 14, 2011, 04:17:30 AM |
|
Uzza, two questions:
1.) what is "phatk imp"
2.) Surely you meant a 5870 instead of a 4870? Either that or you must have four 4870's to hit 430 MH/s!
1 - Phatk Improved - it's what this topic is all about. 2 - Most probably he meant 5870
|
|
|
|
Uzza
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2011, 09:43:38 AM |
|
1 - Phatk Improved - it's what this topic is all about. 2 - Most probably he meant 5870 What this guy said.
|
|
|
|
nico_w
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2011, 04:27:41 PM |
|
Sadly it only gives me 1Mhash/s increase from 344 to 345 on my server, but keep up the good work!
|
|
|
|
MiningBuddy
|
|
July 15, 2011, 11:33:29 AM Last edit: July 15, 2011, 12:02:21 PM by MiningBuddy |
|
Testing the 2011-07-11 kernel.7z
XFX 5870 @ 940/300 Ubuntu 11.04, ATI Drivers 11.5, SDK 2.1 Before: [428.56 Mhash/sec] -> After: [432.28 Mhash/sec] Stales before: 0.22% - > Stales after: 3.48% Over a 4 hour test period
XFX 5870 @ 940/300 Ubuntu 11.04, ATI Drivers 11.5, SDK 2.4 Before: [422.34 Mhash/sec] -> After: [189.58 Mhash/sec] Stales: Not tested due to adverse affects.
|
|
|
|
Diapolo (OP)
|
|
July 15, 2011, 12:15:11 PM |
|
Testing the 2011-07-11 kernel.7z
XFX 5870 @ 940/300 Ubuntu 11.04, ATI Drivers 11.5, SDK 2.1 Before: [428.56 Mhash/sec] -> After: [432.28 Mhash/sec] Stales before: 0.22% - > Stales after: 3.48% Over a 4 hour test period
XFX 5870 @ 940/300 Ubuntu 11.04, ATI Drivers 11.5, SDK 2.4 Before: [422.34 Mhash/sec] -> After: [189.58 Mhash/sec] Stales: Not tested due to adverse affects.
Well that is very strange, but at least you are able to mine faster with SDK2.1 and the current kernel version ^^. Btw. I had other things to do, but during the next week I will release a new version. Dia
|
|
|
|
MiningBuddy
|
|
July 15, 2011, 12:26:44 PM |
|
Testing the 2011-07-11 kernel.7z
XFX 5870 @ 940/300 Ubuntu 11.04, ATI Drivers 11.5, SDK 2.1 Before: [428.56 Mhash/sec] -> After: [432.28 Mhash/sec] Stales before: 0.22% - > Stales after: 3.48% Over a 4 hour test period
XFX 5870 @ 940/300 Ubuntu 11.04, ATI Drivers 11.5, SDK 2.4 Before: [422.34 Mhash/sec] -> After: [189.58 Mhash/sec] Stales: Not tested due to adverse affects.
Well that is very strange, but at least you are able to mine faster with SDK2.1 and the current kernel version ^^. Btw. I had other things to do, but during the next week I will release a new version. Dia Awesome, I look forward to it. I think the rejected shares was random variance from my side as it seems to have settled down to a more realistic 0.88%.
|
|
|
|
jedi95
|
|
July 15, 2011, 07:47:25 PM |
|
Testing the 2011-07-11 kernel.7z
XFX 5870 @ 940/300 Ubuntu 11.04, ATI Drivers 11.5, SDK 2.1 Before: [428.56 Mhash/sec] -> After: [432.28 Mhash/sec] Stales before: 0.22% - > Stales after: 3.48% Over a 4 hour test period
XFX 5870 @ 940/300 Ubuntu 11.04, ATI Drivers 11.5, SDK 2.4 Before: [422.34 Mhash/sec] -> After: [189.58 Mhash/sec] Stales: Not tested due to adverse affects.
Well that is very strange, but at least you are able to mine faster with SDK2.1 and the current kernel version ^^. Btw. I had other things to do, but during the next week I will release a new version. Dia Awesome, I look forward to it. I think the rejected shares was random variance from my side as it seems to have settled down to a more realistic 0.88%. Keep in mind that OpenCL kernel changes have NO effect on stale shares (aside from the VERY small difference in time it takes to run 1 execution of some number of hashes) All nonces found by the kernel to satisfy H == 0 are verified on the CPU prior to sending. Shares are also checked against the current known block before sending, in case new work was received while the kernel was executing. Basically this means that every share sent to the server is valid as far as the miner is concerned. If the OpenCL kernel is returning bad work it will never be sent to the server, and instead you will get "Unusual behavior from OpenCL. Hardware problem?" That said, changes to the python portion of a Phoenix kernel can increase stale shares if badly implemented. (see: FASTLOOP excessive stales with high aggression in older versions of Phoenix)
|
Phoenix Miner developer Donations appreciated at: 1PHoenix9j9J3M6v3VQYWeXrHPPjf7y3rU
|
|
|
zimpixa
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 16, 2011, 11:31:45 PM |
|
Every new version up to 07~ was faster than previous on both of my rigs. 11~ version however is faster for single 5850, but on 5870+5850 rig Im noticing minor slowdown (due to bigger deltas, means best performance is same, but it can go little lower). In adition primary GPU set '-f0' stopped to bottleneck other GPU (but changing from -f35 to -f0 didnt add any speed). After all tests I've changed version on single gpu rig and left old one on double gpu rig.
|
|
|
|
coblee
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1654
Merit: 1354
Creator of Litecoin. Cryptocurrency enthusiast.
|
|
July 17, 2011, 07:53:58 AM |
|
Donation sent! When you release the next version, please explain whats changed in __init__.py. I'm using fpgaminer's poclbm w/ phatk: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=19169.0I'd like to see if we can make your phatk kernel still work with that. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Diapolo (OP)
|
|
July 17, 2011, 01:00:49 PM |
|
Important: since version 2011-07-17 a modified version of __init__.py (for the Phoenix 1.5 miner) is included in this package and has to be used! The kernel won't work for other Miners without modifications to them, see kernel.cl for further infos.
The new version 2011-07-17 is ready for download . Should be faster on 58XX and 69XX cards again. This version will only work, if you use it with Phoenix and the supplied __init__.py file because of modifications to kernel variables! A very big thank you goes to user Vince for input and ideas!Download here: http://www.mediafire.com/?317u0y93u7mnbysHave fun, Dia
|
|
|
|
dikidera
|
|
July 17, 2011, 02:20:07 PM |
|
With this version on my 5870: 410.58/411.6 -> 413.44/414Mhash/s
But on my HD5850, i see a decrease of a minimum of 0.50 mhash/s
|
|
|
|
CYPER
|
|
July 17, 2011, 02:24:58 PM Last edit: July 17, 2011, 02:36:39 PM by CYPER |
|
2011-07-07 was the best for me so far and with 2011-07-17 I see no improvements - the speed is 1758-1760 as before with the same fluctuations.
4x XFX 5870 @ 960Mhz Core & 300Mhz Memory Ubuntu 32bit SDK 2.1 11.5 Drivers
|
|
|
|
Peao
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1320
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 17, 2011, 02:48:05 PM |
|
I noticed an improvement in performance.
Thank you, Dia!
|
|
|
|
erek
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
July 17, 2011, 04:04:50 PM |
|
Solid increase equivalent to nearly 5MHz overclock w/ 2011-07-17
Catalyst 11.7 Early + SDK 2.5
905/340 GPU/VRAM clocks on (2x 6970s)
hitting 812+ MH/sec
|
|
|
|
dishwara
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016
|
|
July 17, 2011, 04:22:47 PM |
|
Same hash rate as mod.zip. No "more" hashes.
|
|
|
|
bcforum
|
|
July 17, 2011, 05:43:55 PM |
|
I get the same speed with DiabloMiner
|
If you found this post useful, feel free to share the wealth: 1E35gTBmJzPNJ3v72DX4wu4YtvHTWqNRbM
|
|
|
Diapolo (OP)
|
|
July 17, 2011, 05:52:28 PM |
|
I get the same speed with DiabloMiner
No need to use Phoenix or this kernel then ... Dia
|
|
|
|
|