I don't think this needs to be stickied; thanks though!
As far as I am aware, no useful test results have ever come from next-test itself, just from my process of putting it together.
If anyone has found bugs for specific pullrequests, or even reported success for any pullrequests using next-test, please feel free to correct me on this.
It's handy as a risky client (I use it myself), and if people want to take advantage of it for that or for testing, they're welcome to.
However, since no other clients have stickies, I don't see any reason next-test should be special in this regard.
I agree it would be nice to have a clear forum thread describing the basic process of testing pullrequests individually.
in bitcoin-qt in console
typed "walletpassphrase xxxxxx 1"
error:
This is an example of an (unfortunately) not useful bug report
There are probably a dozen pullrequests this could have been triggered by, and I cannot reproduce it myself (it works fine for me).
BCB, if you want to help debug this further, I suggest you go through the list of individual pull requests in the opening post one at a time (they're links)
For each one, do:
1. Look for the most recent post by BitcoinPullTester saying "Automatic sanity-testing: PASSED, see <link>"; if there is one, click on that first link.
2. Browse to the bitcoin/ subdirectory, and download bitcoin-qt.exe
3. Try to reproduce the problem using that bitcoin-qt.exe
4. If it has the bug, go back to the main pullrequest page and post a comment there.