[CLOSED] RFCPool.com

[abracadabra]

Vote +2

[organofcorti]

+1 as long as the same crew do it. I'd give a solid 5% for a pool that doesn't treat part time miners as criminals.

[muyoso]

Got the email about payment being sent out but not the payment yet. 

[c_k]

voting for re-opening!

+1 (2GH/s)

[Caesium]

Well, apparently sending lots of transactions at once with no fee causes some of them to be lost into the void forever, being trapped by some internal flood detection.

This morning quite a lot of them were stuck at 0 confirmations, and the money appears not to be in our account or yours - nice one bitcoin!

So I've resent them, this time using a fee of 0.005 and sendmany - bitcoind reported a transaction id of c8ec198e8ba4a99eee14b370baddd1467dae475c268d2ecc15bd07658eacb4cf for these. As of yet it has not appeared on blockexplorer or in the unconfirmed transactions list.

Frankly if that doesn't work, then you'll just have to pop over to Solihull in the UK and collect your earnings in cash, because I just don't trust any more money to this system. Good money is now disappearing after bad and I'm done with it.

I'll publish a dump of our listtransactions if anyone wants, I don't think there are any privacy issues with it - all the information is freely available anyway?

[jkminkov]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=35214.0

check that tool, it could help

[Caesium]

It's sorted. After calming down somewhat and recreating the wallet from the private keys, the dead transactions disappeared and I was able to send the BTC again, and this time the network has accepted it.

Everyone should have their earnings now, without exception.

[jcoin]

Yep, I got mine.. Thanks.

Sad to see this pool go

[MrWizard]

Shit operators.  Keep it closed.

[muyoso]

Shit operators.  Keep it closed.

Wtf? These guys have been some of the most honest and hands on pool operators I have come across.

[Jezzz]

Shit operators.  Keep it closed.

Wtf? These guys have been some of the most honest and hands on pool operators I have come across.

Indeed

[organofcorti]

Shit operators.  Keep it closed.

Huh. Wizards can be trolls, too.

[Stupidpal]

I got my payment. Thanks.

[Graet]

I got my payment. Thanks.

me too, cheers

[AnnihilaT]

Back open?

[Caesium]

Yep, lessons learnt, new reward system, backend scripts being tidied up, etc.

Main issue at the moment is what to set the 'N' in PPLNS to. It's 0.5 but subject to change, considering PPLNH with a 48 hour H actually. Maybe I should do a poll for this?

[organofcorti]

Yep, lessons learnt, new reward system, backend scripts being tidied up, etc.

Main issue at the moment is what to set the 'N' in PPLNS to. It's 0.5 but subject to change, considering PPLNH with a 48 hour H actually. Maybe I should do a poll for this?

I wonder how pool hopping would affect pplnh? If you were to get slashdotted and got a boost of 200Ghps with a pplnh set for 20Ghps, you'd have much shorter rounds which apart from the "no reset at boundary". This would make h a lot larger than n=0.5. Would that matter?

[c_k]

Welcome back rfcpool! 

[Caesium]

Yep, lessons learnt, new reward system, backend scripts being tidied up, etc.

Main issue at the moment is what to set the 'N' in PPLNS to. It's 0.5 but subject to change, considering PPLNH with a 48 hour H actually. Maybe I should do a poll for this?

I wonder how pool hopping would affect pplnh? If you were to get slashdotted and got a boost of 200Ghps with a pplnh set for 20Ghps, you'd have much shorter rounds which apart from the "no reset at boundary". This would make h a lot larger than n=0.5. Would that matter?

No, it shouldn't matter - N being at 0.5 right now isn't set in stone, it's just to get us going; I didn't want N too high at first because it would then take ages for the initial reward estimates to ramp up.

Using H instead will just avoid having to tweak N when the pool hashrate varies.

[ChrisLandin]

Good to see you guys back.