|
erschiessen
|
|
July 24, 2013, 04:28:45 PM |
|
thank you for posting this!
|
Your Message Here 12KHW3i2Hamk1irY8b181N4vMXUnVYL1ah
|
|
|
Axion_Zen
|
|
July 24, 2013, 04:31:17 PM |
|
not worth it if you read the posts..64 core too slow they would need to develop 1024 core to make it better than gpu
|
|
|
|
finlof
|
|
July 24, 2013, 05:06:26 PM |
|
not worth it if you read the posts..64 core too slow they would need to develop 1024 core to make it better than gpu
depends on the power usage, price, and what it can actually hash whether it's better than a GPU or not. ie - if you can get 5kh/s per core on a 64 core then that's 320kh/s at 5w usage. that could possibly be worth $200. time will tell.
|
|
|
|
|
TheSwede75
|
|
July 24, 2013, 08:06:45 PM |
|
I am thinking it might be even more interesting for Primecoin Mining..
|
|
|
|
iikun
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1062
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 24, 2013, 09:55:18 PM |
|
interesting, but more of an evolution than a revolution like asics were.
|
|
|
|
Zalfrin
|
|
July 25, 2013, 02:08:57 AM |
|
Not too bad of a price when the FPGA is $50+/each in bulk, but I doubt the $100 version of this board will be of much use to miners. It comes with the XC7Z010 device w/ 28k logic cells, versus the 150k logic cells in the big spartan 6's. I guess if you get the ARM core to do enough work and are selective about what you offload to hardware, it could be useful. I'd be more interested in the XC7Z020 variant w/ 85k logic cells. Of course those devices are more like $100+/each in bulk. Here's another board that uses these chips: http://www.zedboard.org/content/board-functionsEDIT: Heh, I didn't read very closely. I guess the real interesting part of the dev boards in the OP is this: http://www.adapteva.com/products/silicon-devices/Sounds fun.
|
|
|
|
erk
|
|
July 25, 2013, 02:23:53 AM |
|
A bit early I think for that one.
|
|
|
|
Gordon Bleu
|
|
July 25, 2013, 02:41:54 AM |
|
I ordered one and got a Tweet from Solar Designer @solardiz I guess you mean Litecoin and not scrypt per se. Ideally, ~5 kh/s on 16-core Epiphany, ~20 on 64-core.
So it seems useless for Litecoin , you would still need 500 Watts for 500kh/s, but there's still a little hope on Google`s Summer Camp http://www.openwall.com/lists/announce/2013/04/28/1
|
♥♥AROUSR.COM♥♥ The Adult Chat Community (21+) We now accept BTCitcoins | Connect with hot girls for chat, talk, trade pics and more!➠Visit http://arousr.com (21+)|
|
|
|
papamoi
|
|
July 25, 2013, 03:20:53 AM |
|
watching
|
|
|
|
spartan82
|
|
July 25, 2013, 08:50:45 AM |
|
Watching
|
|
|
|
altsay
|
|
July 25, 2013, 12:28:08 PM |
|
Sounds promising.
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 27, 2013, 03:19:07 AM |
|
I heard about this months ago, and when I heard they were shipping, my first thought was also LTC. I'd be curious what it can do. They're only shipping the 16 core version now, but soon have the 64 core version soon.
|
|
|
|
teknohog
|
|
September 03, 2013, 03:40:47 PM |
|
Not too bad of a price when the FPGA is $50+/each in bulk, but I doubt the $100 version of this board will be of much use to miners. It comes with the XC7Z010 device w/ 28k logic cells, versus the 150k logic cells in the big spartan 6's. I guess if you get the ARM core to do enough work and are selective about what you offload to hardware, it could be useful. I'd be more interested in the XC7Z020 variant w/ 85k logic cells. Of course those devices are more like $100+/each in bulk. Here's another board that uses these chips: http://www.zedboard.org/content/board-functionsEDIT: Heh, I didn't read very closely. I guess the real interesting part of the dev boards in the OP is this: http://www.adapteva.com/products/silicon-devices/Sounds fun. I recently ordered one with the XC7Z020, with no particular application in mind -- for example, it's a relatively cheap devkit for the FPGA only, considering alternatives like the Zedboard. There have been lots of $99 boards with just an ARM-based computer, basically beefed-up Raspis; this one is similar but with an FPGA and the Epiphany coprocessor. I'm guessing the reason it has an FPGA in the first place is a cost-effective way to develop a suitable interconnect for the coprocessor, but in some ways I find the FPGA more interesting in itself As for mining on the FPGA, I hope nobody is seriously expecting any profit with these...
|
|
|
|
tarui
|
|
September 03, 2013, 03:51:40 PM |
|
watching too
|
|
|
|
volosator
|
|
September 03, 2013, 04:10:47 PM |
|
What is expected performance?
|
|
|
|
papamoi
|
|
September 03, 2013, 06:06:46 PM |
|
so does anyone have anything mining on this?
if yes how?and what to expect?
thanks
|
|
|
|
forum2005
|
|
September 03, 2013, 06:20:44 PM |
|
watching... and waiting my parallella
|
|
|
|
lordzav
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
December 17, 2013, 02:27:04 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|