Bitcoin Forum
July 08, 2024, 04:16:42 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Confused about PCIe slots and multiple GPUs  (Read 124 times)
json111 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 26, 2017, 08:05:19 PM
 #1

Hi all,

I'm pretty new to mining. I was thinking of setting up a hybrid mining/workstation using two GTX 1060 GPUs. Most of the motherboards I'm looking at (like this one: https://www.msi.com/Motherboard/X370-GAMING-PLUS/Specification) feature two full-sized x16 PCIe connections, but the motherboard specs say that they function as either x16 (if using one GPU) or x8/x8 (if using two GPUs). Does not being able to run them at x16/x16 matter for hash rates? If not then could I potentially use another Gen2 slot for another GPU (even though it's an x4)?

Let me know if this makes any sense.
gotminer
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 24


View Profile
December 26, 2017, 09:07:27 PM
 #2

Hi all,

I'm pretty new to mining. I was thinking of setting up a hybrid mining/workstation using two GTX 1060 GPUs. Most of the motherboards I'm looking at (like this one: https://www.msi.com/Motherboard/X370-GAMING-PLUS/Specification) feature two full-sized x16 PCIe connections, but the motherboard specs say that they function as either x16 (if using one GPU) or x8/x8 (if using two GPUs). Does not being able to run them at x16/x16 matter for hash rates? If not then could I potentially use another Gen2 slot for another GPU (even though it's an x4)?

Let me know if this makes any sense.

It's not going to matter.  That board has six pcie slots and you could use all six of them for mining, if you wanted to.  It makes no difference as far as your hash rates if the gpu is in a x16 slot or not.  The boards I use only have (2) x16 slots and I use all six slots on the board for mining gpu's.

Ok, I want you to walk back in there and very calmly, very politely tell the risk assessors to fuck off! -Mark Baum
json111 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 26, 2017, 09:19:07 PM
 #3

Ok thanks, that puts my mind at ease. But why does it not matter? Isn't GPU mining a really computationally intensive process? Is it just that Gen3 lines are advanced enough that they can handle any throughput that GPU/CPU pathway requires?
malthrax
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 26, 2017, 09:42:14 PM
 #4

Ok thanks, that puts my mind at ease. But why does it not matter? Isn't GPU mining a really computationally intensive process? Is it just that Gen3 lines are advanced enough that they can handle any throughput that GPU/CPU pathway requires?

The primary reason for having 16 PCIe lanes from your graphics card direct into the CPU is for loading huge texture maps for 3D modeling/rendering (either in video games, or CGI generation).  For crypto mining, there's simply not enough data being pushed back & forth from the CPU to the GPU to require all 16 ( or even 8 ) lanes.

QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
December 26, 2017, 11:32:57 PM
 #5

Cryptocoin mining is low bandwidth, so the use of even 1x slots works fine with little or ZERO impact on hashrates.

 There are other stuff you can do with a PC that IS bandwidth-intensive though, like Gaming or running the Folding@home client, where anything less than a 8x PCI-E 3.0 or 16x PCI-E 2.0 slot can have a measurable impact.


I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!