Bitcoin Forum
August 20, 2018, 11:19:57 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 ... 166 »
  Print  
Author Topic: MasterCoin: New Protocol Layer Starting From “The Exodus Address”  (Read 447298 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
zathras
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 09, 2013, 08:12:12 PM
 #1181

I've setup a VM to play around with masterchest-wallet but I think I might be missing a dependencies:

See the end of this message for details on invoking
just-in-time (JIT) debugging instead of this dialog box.

Code:
************** Exception Text **************
System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not load file or assembly 'System.Data.SqlServerCe, Version=3.5.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
File name: 'System.Data.SqlServerCe, Version=3.5.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91'
   at Masterchest_Wallet.Form1.SQLGetSingleVal(Object sqlquery)
   at Masterchest_Wallet.Form1.lnkwcont_LinkClicked(Object sender, LinkLabelLinkClickedEventArgs e)
   at System.Windows.Forms.LinkLabel.OnLinkClicked(LinkLabelLinkClickedEventArgs e)
   at System.Windows.Forms.LinkLabel.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs e)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmMouseUp(Message& m, MouseButtons button, Int32 clicks)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Label.WndProc(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.LinkLabel.WndProc(Message& msg)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)

WRN: Assembly binding logging is turned OFF.
To enable assembly bind failure logging, set the registry value [HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Fusion!EnableLog] (DWORD) to 1.
Note: There is some performance penalty associated with assembly bind failure logging.
To turn this feature off, remove the registry value [HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Fusion!EnableLog].



************** Loaded Assemblies **************
mscorlib
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18051 built by: FX45RTMGDR
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v4.0.30319/mscorlib.dll
----------------------------------------
Masterchest_Wallet
    Assembly Version: 1.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.0.0.0
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Users/Animazing/Documents/wallet/Masterchest_Wallet.exe
----------------------------------------
Microsoft.VisualBasic
    Assembly Version: 10.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 11.0.50709.17929 built by: FX45RTMREL
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.VisualBasic/v4.0_10.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll
----------------------------------------
System
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18022 built by: FX45RTMGDR
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Core
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.17929 built by: FX45RTMREL
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Core/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Core.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Windows.Forms
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18037 built by: FX45RTMGDR
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Drawing
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18022 built by: FX45RTMGDR
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Runtime.Remoting
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.17929 built by: FX45RTMREL
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Runtime.Remoting/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Runtime.Remoting.dll
----------------------------------------
Masterchest
    Assembly Version: 1.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.0.0.0
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Users/Animazing/Documents/wallet/Masterchest.DLL
----------------------------------------
Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.Vs
    Assembly Version: 10.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 10.0.40219.1
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Users/Animazing/Documents/wallet/Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.Vs.DLL
----------------------------------------
System.Data
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.17929 built by: FX45RTMREL
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_32/System.Data/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Data.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Xml
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18058 built by: FX45RTMGDR
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Numerics
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.17929 built by: FX45RTMREL
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Numerics/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Numerics.dll
----------------------------------------

************** JIT Debugging **************
To enable just-in-time (JIT) debugging, the .config file for this
application or computer (machine.config) must have the
jitDebugging value set in the system.windows.forms section.
The application must also be compiled with debugging
enabled.

For example:

<configuration>
    <system.windows.forms jitDebugging="true" />
</configuration>

When JIT debugging is enabled, any unhandled exception
will be sent to the JIT debugger registered on the computer
rather than be handled by this dialog box.


Any idea what I need to install Zathras?


Sorry guys, bit rushed last night and I forgot to include a referenced DLL for the local database.  Also corrected a minor config issue.  Please download MasterchestWalletBinaryAlpha.zip again and see how you guys get on.

Thanks for testing Tachikoma Smiley

Smart Property & Distributed Exchange: Master Protocol for Bitcoin
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1534807197
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534807197

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534807197
Reply with quote  #2

1534807197
Report to moderator
1534807197
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534807197

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534807197
Reply with quote  #2

1534807197
Report to moderator
1534807197
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534807197

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534807197
Reply with quote  #2

1534807197
Report to moderator
maxmint
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 09, 2013, 08:27:37 PM
 #1182

Note that I've previously mentioned that I plan to add a "pay dividend" command to the spec.

Yes, I think this would be very important!

I'm wondering how much information should be embedded in the genesis of a smart property. E.g., when creating a new property, would we need to have a "pays dividend" field? And do we need to define the currency in which dividends are paid right from the start when creating the smart property?

My PGP-Key: 462D02D8
Verify my messages using keybase: https://keybase.io/maxmint
dacoinminster
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1022


Rational Exuberance


View Profile WWW
October 09, 2013, 08:39:37 PM
 #1183

Note that I've previously mentioned that I plan to add a "pay dividend" command to the spec.

Yes, I think this would be very important!

I'm wondering how much information should be embedded in the genesis of a smart property. E.g., when creating a new property, would we need to have a "pays dividend" field? And do we need to define the currency in which dividends are paid right from the start when creating the smart property?


Nah. Pay dividend will just be something like "Pay X amount of currency Y evenly distributed among people holding currency Z"

ripper234
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
October 09, 2013, 08:43:54 PM
 #1184

As usual these days I sadly have little time to following the super exciting progress you guys are all making... Sad

I did want to share a small idea of my own, regarding to the backed currencies feature.

Implementing IndexCoin on top of MasterCoin

(Please reply on that thread so we can track it, I'm copy-pasting here to save you a click)

We are building an investment platform that specializes in crypto-currencies and other crypto-assets. A major part of our offering is the ability to purchase composite assets that automatically diversify into the various alt currencies, AKA "IndexCoins".

What occurred to us is that soon, using MasterCoin backed currencies feature, we could implement such indexes as trustless independent assets! (assuming the whole backed currencies feature works, which still remains to be seen).

We could program the creation of an asset, backed by a Trust Fund, that aims to track the index itself.
This is how it could work:

1. We would publish price feeds of the various alt currencies on top of the MasterCoin blockchain.
2. We would then create a new backed currencies, backed by Mastercoin for example, that tracks the weighted average of the top 10 currencies in our feed.

Regulatory wise, this might mean that we are no longer "creating an index" on an ongoing basis, because what we'll be doing is just publishing a price feed of the alt currencies, not managing the composition. The price of the new index coin will be automatically calculated by the Mastercoin blockchain (or rather the clients implementing it), and the fund would purchase or sell coins based on the discrepancy between the price of the new coin and its underlying assets, just like any other backed currencies.

TL;DR - if "backed currencies" can be used to implement GoldCoins, they can be used to implement IndexCoins.

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
Racer8
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 147
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 10, 2013, 12:40:53 PM
 #1185

I've tried searching this thread for the answer to my question so apologies if this question has already been asked or indeed answered in the specification but..

I'm not savvy enough to understand the technical concepts so I'm happy to ask the dumb questions so - where does the Mastercoin itself derive its value from?.  I.e. what role does it perform - if I understand the spec correctly the parent currency can be any currency?  Can an escrow be any currency?  Why does this very promising protocol need Mastercoin currency?
ripper234
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
October 10, 2013, 02:19:15 PM
 #1186

I've tried searching this thread for the answer to my question so apologies if this question has already been asked or indeed answered in the specification but..

I'm not savvy enough to understand the technical concepts so I'm happy to ask the dumb questions so - where does the Mastercoin itself derive its value from?.  I.e. what role does it perform - if I understand the spec correctly the parent currency can be any currency?  Can an escrow be any currency?  Why does this very promising protocol need Mastercoin currency?

Great questions, I added an answer to the FAQ.

Where does Mastercoin derive its value from? Why is it valuable?

The initial value for mastercoins came out of the fundraiser "anchoring". People were willing to "sacrifice" 1 BTC in exchange for about 100 MSC, so it anchored the initial value of MSC in at least 0.01 BTC per MSC.

The more general answer is that Mastercoin provides a set of features that only work with mastercoins or Mastercoin-based currencies, and there is a limited number of them. So, in order to enjoy these features, you have to own some mastercoins, giving them an independant value. The more real world usage Mastercoin sees, the higher the value of each mastercoin can get. In addition, as always, a lot of its value is currently driven by speculators executing a price discovery process.

Can escrows / backed currencies be made using any currency? Why are mastercoins required?

Backed currencies work with mastercoins or any currency derived from mastercoins. The value of the backing currencies must be high enough, or the backed currency will fail. Mastercoin are required as the root of the new hierarchy of currencies, bitcoins themselves cannot be used as the root, and since the backing-backed relation requires a root currency, a "mastercoin" root is needed.

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
Racer8
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 147
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 10, 2013, 02:57:59 PM
 #1187

Great answer - got it!
HammerFist
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 10, 2013, 06:26:46 PM
 #1188

Great answer - got it!
I don't think that is a good answer at all.

So, we can make new currencies with new wonderful functions based upon this 'mastercoin' protocol.  But there are only 500000 MSC.  So, what currency is going to be based upon something only having a unit of 500,000?  Of course, one MSC is very highly divisible - so you only need one MSC to make a million CoolCoins - each worth about $100 lets say.  Then another guy takes 1 MSC and makes two million SuperCoolCoins with even better functions - these are worth $500 each.  Well, there isn't much demand at all for the other 499,997 MSC because CoolCoins and SuperCoolCoins and maybe two or three others are all we really need.  Nobody wants the other MSC.  OK - now we have 'smart properties' and 1000 companies each buy 1 mastercoin, divide it into 1 million shares, and use that for their stock issue.  I am still holding my 100 MSC and nobody wants them because there are 499,000 still doing nothing.  They are easy to buy until they become scarce.  But because we'll never have 500,000 projects each of which consume one MSC and divide it down to one million (or more) pieces, they will never be worth much.

Specifically, MSC holders do not own this sexy protocol being developed.  The protocol will be free to copy by anyone and they can run their copy right on the same BTC blockchain.  Even if demand for MSC does finally get high enough to make them worth $5 - Anyone can 'relaunch' an identical protocol and create a Billion MSC2 leaving MSC holders with nothing.

It is important to note - MSC holders bought those coins with good money and that money is being used to devo the protocol.  When it is all wonderful and developed, JR has done nothing to maintain ownership of that protocol.  A competitor will just come in, scoop it up, restart it on a parallel effort and MSC holders will have nothing.  

JR says the big guys won't be able to do that because they will be too 'far behind'.  Ask Microsoft how they felt when everyone laughed at Internet Explorer in view of Netscape.  Netscape was sure that Microsoft was just way too far behind.  Netscape was out of business about ten minutes later.
HammerFist
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 10, 2013, 06:45:42 PM
 #1189

Put a bounty on a marketing package of sorts.
JR - Please don't listen to this nonsense.  Zero marketing is correct.  If it works, it works.  That is all.  It will be wildly popular without marketing if we get it working.  Just get it working.  We don't need a fancy logo and a pretty paint.  Save that crap for project without merit.
bitwhizz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 10, 2013, 07:13:00 PM
 #1190

Put a bounty on a marketing package of sorts.
JR - Please don't listen to this nonsense.  Zero marketing is correct.  If it works, it works.  That is all.  It will be wildly popular without marketing if we get it working.  Just get it working.  We don't need a fancy logo and a pretty paint.  Save that crap for project without merit.

I  have to agree with this, no marketing is needed if this works in my opinion, its usefulness will market itself, after its working, then marketing can always be an option but i think funds would be better spent on mastercoin development and just let the power of free journalism and word of mouth spread be the driving force for a viral effect (which i'm sure will happen). However a good introductary video for master coin is imperative such as the one's made for color coin, bitcoin and ripple.
murraypaul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 10, 2013, 07:51:40 PM
 #1191

Put a bounty on a marketing package of sorts.
JR - Please don't listen to this nonsense.  Zero marketing is correct.  If it works, it works.  That is all.

Marketing might be useful once there is an it.
At the moment there is nothing but a set of ideas.

Mastercoin is to XRP as Ripple is to ...?
At some point someone will need to fill in the blank.

BTC: 16TgAGdiTSsTWSsBDphebNJCFr1NT78xFW
SRC: scefi1XMhq91n3oF5FrE3HqddVvvCZP9KB
bitwhizz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 10, 2013, 08:15:22 PM
 #1192

Quote
However a good introductary video for master coin is imperative such as the one's made for color coin, bitcoin and ripple.

= Marketing.

I'm not talking about spending 50K on a big fancy pro deal. But do something to keep the wheels spinning and get the word out. Despite what many of you may think, marketing DOES matter. Most people don't have a clue that mastercoin even exists, let alone what it is supposed to accomplish. There is a serious lack of talent interested in this (not saying those involved aren't talented, but we need more, specialized, and project dedicated/full-time) which translates into a lack of momentum, direction, progress and general cohesion. Anyone (useful) in management knows you don't hobble together the product, then try to find a team. You put together a great team, then the rest will follow. That requires selling your passion for the idea and making others believe in it.

I agree with what your saying, yes of course marketing matters..... But the point which your not getting is that first you need a product to market (not an idea), before even thinking of spending funds on marketing. Right now its kind of obvious that  allocation of funds should go primarily towards master coin protocol program development, not marketing. After theirs a functioning mastercoin, then sure marketing expenditure should definatley be considered. And yes i know an introductory video is a marketing tactic, my point is really that i believe thats the only marketing tactic that is needed at this stage.

Edit

When you stated 'There is a serious lack of talent' (from what i've read on this thread, their is definately talent working on this) thats not such a marketing issue, thats more of a headhunting issue which shouldn't require marketing, it requires incentives such as monetary gains and other rewards, which JR willet is doing through competitions etc. Perhaps J.R willet should be speaking to universities and announcing the competition  within computer science graduates to help develop this protocol, or other ways of fishing more talent apart from bitcoin talk forum (i'm not sure if he is doing this or not), thats my suggestion in getting more talent involved
dacoinminster
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1022


Rational Exuberance


View Profile WWW
October 10, 2013, 09:04:18 PM
 #1193

The talent we have attracted has far exceeded my expectations, and the progress they are making is way more than I had hoped for. I'm not looking for new talent at all (although more are welcome to join if they are interested in participating).

I figured it would take us maybe three or four months to get as far as we have gotten in one month. I couldn't be happier. Our guys are absolutely rocking this project, and I think everyone invested in MasterCoin should be glad we have them.

bitwhizz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 10, 2013, 09:06:07 PM
 #1194

The talent we have attracted has far exceeded my expectations, and the progress they are making is way more than I had hoped for. I'm not looking for new talent at all (although more are welcome to join if they are interested in participating).

I figured it would take us maybe three or four months to get as far as we have gotten in one month. I couldn't be happier. Our guys are absolutely rocking this project, and I think everyone invested in MasterCoin should be glad we have them.

Good to hear, the quick progress of this project has made me think that searching for new talent wasn't an  issue, for the record
dacoinminster
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1022


Rational Exuberance


View Profile WWW
October 10, 2013, 09:28:53 PM
 #1195

I just noticed this question on reddit:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1o5cfb/investments_similar_to_bitcoin/

Quote
What other odd, lucrative, volatile, and outside the box investments are out there that are similar to bitcoin? Not necessarily just crypto currency either. Just curious.

Of course I went to suggest MasterCoin in the comments, except I found that TWO other comments beat me to the punch.

That suggests to me that we don't need to do ANY marketing. People know about us. We just need to execute on our plan!

ripper234
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
October 10, 2013, 10:05:00 PM
 #1196

The talent we have attracted has far exceeded my expectations, and the progress they are making is way more than I had hoped for. I'm not looking for new talent at all (although more are welcome to join if they are interested in participating).

I figured it would take us maybe three or four months to get as far as we have gotten in one month. I couldn't be happier. Our guys are absolutely rocking this project, and I think everyone invested in MasterCoin should be glad we have them.

+1000 MSC

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
ripper234
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
October 10, 2013, 10:07:33 PM
 #1197

Although one thing that I am missing is a weekly update thread by Willet.

There's so much going on, and so I think that summarizing last week's progress in a short post that only Willet can update to would be terrific for communications.

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
vokain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 10, 2013, 10:22:29 PM
 #1198

The talent we have attracted has far exceeded my expectations, and the progress they are making is way more than I had hoped for. I'm not looking for new talent at all (although more are welcome to join if they are interested in participating).

I figured it would take us maybe three or four months to get as far as we have gotten in one month. I couldn't be happier. Our guys are absolutely rocking this project, and I think everyone invested in MasterCoin should be glad we have them.

So there is now no intention to seek a full time developer to lead this project?

The right developer will find us if it's needed. As for now, I don't see anyone better qualified than J.R. yet to lead. Development has been very organic and liquid thus far.

         ▄█▄  ▄▄▄▄
          ▀ ▄██████▄
    ▄▄▄   ▄███▀▀███
  ▄█████▄ ▀█▀ ███▄ ▀▀
 ███▀  ▀██▄    ████▄   
 █▀ ▄██▄ ▀█▀ ▄██▀ ▀█▀ ▄██
  ▄██▀     ▄██▀     ▄██▀
 ██▀ ▄█▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄  ██▀ ▄▄
      ▀███▀    ▀██▄  ▄██▀
     ▄▄ ▀██▄ ▄█▄ ▀█████▀
     ███▄▄██▀   ▀▀
      ▀██████▀
        ▀▀▀▀   ██▀

  █
  █
  █
████
  █
████
  █
████
  █
  █
  █


▄███▄    ▄███▄
███  ██▄ █▀▀▄
████████  ███▀
██▀ ▄███      
████████▄▄  ▄█▀
 ██████▀▀██▀▀
  ▀███▀▄▄   ▄
   ▀██▄██ ▄█▀
     ▀▀██▀▀
FULLY
ANONYMOUS

━━━━━
/

    ██▄▄              ▄▄██
   █▀  ▀█▄ ▄▄▄▄████▄██▀  ▀█
  █▀   ▄███▀▀▀       █▄   ▀█
 █▀   ▄███▄ ▄▄█▄▄     █▄   ▀█
██▄  ▄████████████▄▄  █▄  ▄██
  ▀▀██▀███████████████▄███▀▀
      ▀█▄█▀███████████▀▀
        ▀███▀███████▀
           ▀▀▀▀██▀▀
INSTANT
TRANSFER

━━━━
/

     ▄████▄
 ▄▄▄████████▄▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▀██▀ ▀█  ▀█ ███▀
 ██ ▀ █ ▀▄█ ███
▄██▄█▄█▄███▄███▄
▀██████████████▀
 ▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
     ▀████▀
API FOR YOUR
PROJECTS

━━━━

  █
  █
  █
████
  █
████
  █
████
  █
  █
  █
PARTNER PROGRAM
TOR MIRROR
MIX WALLET
.FAQ
ANN THREAD
TELEGRAM
ripper234
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
October 10, 2013, 10:38:52 PM
 #1199

Look at this interesting find - someone is trying to implement the Saving Address feature of Mastercoin directly on the Bitcoin blockchain (perhaps with another side chain).

FYI, I created a wiki entry that describes the Saving Address feature, categorized under the new Features category. Feel free to create entries to describe other Mastercoin features if you want (including feature requests).

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
Luckybit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 10, 2013, 11:25:10 PM
 #1200

The talent we have attracted has far exceeded my expectations, and the progress they are making is way more than I had hoped for. I'm not looking for new talent at all (although more are welcome to join if they are interested in participating).

I figured it would take us maybe three or four months to get as far as we have gotten in one month. I couldn't be happier. Our guys are absolutely rocking this project, and I think everyone invested in MasterCoin should be glad we have them.

Why not go to ODesk and announce it there? Plenty of unemployed talented programmers who would be interested.
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 ... 166 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!