Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 02:41:53 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Antminer S9 on 110v with APW3++  (Read 420 times)
tuaris (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 765
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
December 28, 2017, 11:13:42 PM
 #1

I was expecting the S9 to arrive in Jan 2018 but it arrived much sooner (yay!  Grin).  
Problem is I'm not prepared yet to power it at 220v as is suggested for the APW3++ power supply.  For the moment I only have 110v.

If I were to attempt to power it using 110v would it result in damage to the miner/power supply?  Or would it simply run at a less efficient rate?

1715395313
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715395313

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715395313
Reply with quote  #2

1715395313
Report to moderator
1715395313
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715395313

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715395313
Reply with quote  #2

1715395313
Report to moderator
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715395313
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715395313

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715395313
Reply with quote  #2

1715395313
Report to moderator
fanatic26
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 560


View Profile
December 28, 2017, 11:19:15 PM
 #2

Dont do it, you will have problems. Even if you get it to start hashing on the PSU it will be overloading the power supply very badly. What you can do for now is hook it up to 2 of the hash boards and the controller and run it on 2 until you get the proper outlet setup for it.

Stop buying industrial miners, running them at home, and then complaining about the noise.
dlezama
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 17


View Profile
December 28, 2017, 11:21:04 PM
 #3

I was expecting the S9 to arrive in Jan 2018 but it arrived much sooner (yay!  Grin).  
Problem is I'm not prepared yet to power it at 220v as is suggested for the APW3++ power supply.  For the moment I only have 110v.

If I were to attempt to power it using 110v would it result in damage to the miner/power supply?  Or would it simply run at a less efficient rate?
It may work, but you can also burn your power supply, with some extra bad luck your miner could go down with it. The failure rate of these machines is already high (meaning they are pretty low quality) so I wouldn't push it beyond specs. If you really can't wait for your 220v installation you could buy a 1600W 110V PSU (and then resell it, return it, whatever).
Edit: And yes, use only two boards is an option too, that's how I'm running mine but just because one board lasted only 4 days...
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7865


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
December 28, 2017, 11:23:39 PM
 #4

I was expecting the S9 to arrive in Jan 2018 but it arrived much sooner (yay!  Grin).  
Problem is I'm not prepared yet to power it at 220v as is suggested for the APW3++ power supply.  For the moment I only have 110v.

If I were to attempt to power it using 110v would it result in damage to the miner/power supply?  Or would it simply run at a less efficient rate?

power  two boards  and the controller.


do not power the center board.

you will  get 9th instead of 13.5 th the psu can do that.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
tuaris (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 765
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
December 28, 2017, 11:32:49 PM
 #5

Great, thanks all.
One last quick question.  The included documentation says the total current at the wall for an S9 is 20A.  Is that correct, it seems a bit high?  Wouldn't it be 14A?  Or am I missing something (ie. power factor is not 1)?

fanatic26
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 560


View Profile
December 28, 2017, 11:49:38 PM
 #6

Great, thanks all.
One last quick question.  The included documentation says the total current at the wall for an S9 is 20A.  Is that correct, it seems a bit high?  Wouldn't it be 14A?  Or am I missing something (ie. power factor is not 1)?

It pulls around 6.5-7 amp at 220 so around 14 on 110 is right. If its pulling 20 amps id say grab a fire extinguisher lol

Stop buying industrial miners, running them at home, and then complaining about the noise.
smckmobile
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 30, 2017, 01:58:46 PM
Last edit: December 30, 2017, 08:48:36 PM by frodocooper
 #7

yall are wrong. the power supply does both input voltages plug it into 110 it runs fine. this is from bitmains page.
2. The APW3++ can deliver a maximum power of only 1200W if it is connected to a 110V mains power supply. To obtain the rated power of 1600W, the APW3++ must be connected to a 220-240V mains power supply. Please check the mains power supply that is the standard in your region before ordering.  you can go to lowes and buy a 6-20R receptacle and 6-20P plug if you want to wire it up for 220v its smaller than a dryer plug in.
 I have been told that it will most of the times still hash at 13.5 ths even on 110v.
this is out of the s9 manual.
 The miner does not contain a DC/DC converter; therefore, higher input voltage will cause higher
Mining efficiency .

or read this
https://shop.bitmain.com/productDetail.htm?pid=00020171107201722598O4kMWe280658

Code:
Specifications

Output

DC Voltage

12.15V

Rated Current
(220V input)

133A

Rated Current
(110V input)

100A

Rated Power
(220V input)

1600W

Rated Power
(110V input)

1200W

Ripple & Noise

<1%

Voltage Regulation

<2%

Source Regulation

<1%

Load Regulation

<1%

Setup, Rise Time

<2S

Power off Protection Trip Time

>9mS

Interface Type

 5 pairs of 6 pin PCI-E connectors (i.e. 10 connectors)

Noise Level

 <43DB

Input

Voltage Range

100-240V AC

Starting Voltage

95-105V AC

Frequency Range

47-63Hz

Power Factor

>0.95 (full load)

Leakage Current

<1.5mA (220V 50Hz)

Protection

Low-voltage Input

80-89V AC

Output Short Circuit

Yes

Output Overcurrent

134-185A max.

Overheat Protection

Yes

Environment Conditions

Operating Temperature

-20°C - 50°C

Operating Humidity

20% - 90% relative humidity (non-condensing)

Structure

Dimensions

220mm*108mm*62mm

Cooling

Fan

Forced-air cooling



(Moderator note: This post was edited by frodocooper to use code tags for the quoted specifications from Bitmain's APW3++ product page.)
Raymond_B
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 71

Just Getting Started...


View Profile WWW
January 30, 2018, 04:35:11 PM
 #8


yall are wrong. the power supply does both input voltages plug it into 110 it runs fine. this is from bitmains page.

 I have been told that it will most of the times still hash at 13.5 ths even on 110v.
 

No, these guys are right it is you who's wrong. While yes, the PSU will run off 110v (the PSU is pretty much a multi purpose PSU) it will not provide adequate power to run an S9. If the S9 does power up it will be at a lower hashrate. Just read the forum and you'll find plenty of people who's S9s wont even start with the APW3++ on 110v.

I bolded the part about you having been told, so you haven't actually done what you are recommending?


Razon
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 3


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 04:49:49 PM
 #9

You are too excited to start mining, just sit and relax a sec, or you will damage or shorten the life of your miner.

Just wait for your electrician to come in and install a 220V connection for you.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!