Need some testers - I'm willing to fund

[coinerd]

iG9ZQiY6c6zCLfEc3c9Yq3tvZoQ4Hshd3D Cheers.

sent have fun!

http://flip.coinworld.us/IFC/

(2 rejects so far)

[kimosan]

You going to raise the max or keep it at 1000?

Second thought, maybe not with the block split coming soon?

[coinerd]

You going to raise the max or keep it at 1000?

Second thought, maybe not with the block split coming soon?

how do you like that 10 IFC minimum fee that's on the way?

Catering to miners at the expense of any potential users - and guarantees a lasting impression of low value.

[kimosan]

Think it's fine the way it is.

2 trans in a row sent, nothing returned.

Transaction ID: 36cdb41883602e44077193151d0786a3d840d7492da0db720400a5b47dff92df

Transaction ID: 4554a310a39bfa31ff4bd1e6e061397e57d6aad29922c7bf8d8bbe79ee21065a

lol @ whoever sent the 10k and got 100 penalty.

[jdebunt]

Think it's fine the way it is.

2 trans in a row sent, nothing returned.

Transaction ID: 36cdb41883602e44077193151d0786a3d840d7492da0db720400a5b47dff92df

Transaction ID: 4554a310a39bfa31ff4bd1e6e061397e57d6aad29922c7bf8d8bbe79ee21065a

lol @ whoever sent the 10k and got 100 penalty.

Sometimes there is a small delay in processing transactions

[afroman1131]

The large amounts are me, im trying to see what happens if i send over limit, also i have learned that by sending too large of amounts you will not have them returned lol

[kimosan]

Think it's fine the way it is.

2 trans in a row sent, nothing returned.

Transaction ID: 36cdb41883602e44077193151d0786a3d840d7492da0db720400a5b47dff92df

Transaction ID: 4554a310a39bfa31ff4bd1e6e061397e57d6aad29922c7bf8d8bbe79ee21065a

lol @ whoever sent the 10k and got 100 penalty.

Sometimes there is a small delay in processing transactions

Noticed that earlier, been 10 minutes, still nothing on both.

[ahmed_bodi]

just done around 10 1k transactions

[coinerd]

Think it's fine the way it is.

2 trans in a row sent, nothing returned.

Transaction ID: 36cdb41883602e44077193151d0786a3d840d7492da0db720400a5b47dff92df

Transaction ID: 4554a310a39bfa31ff4bd1e6e061397e57d6aad29922c7bf8d8bbe79ee21065a

hmm i have the 45554 as rejected but 36cd i have no record of - this thing might be weaker than I thought.

It has a 5 second rate limit on running the script and I'm not sure how many this server/db can process per cycle.

cycle is approximately 30 seconds when idle, the page does a background ajax to accelerate that to every 8 seconds when someone has it loaded. if too many people are on the page it will be tripping the rate limit.

[coinerd]

just done around 10 1k transactions

Did you get 10 payouts?

edit: Just had an awful run 5 of the last 12 were rejects.  I had to update the logging as implode wasn't working in a multidimensional array.

So far this test has brought about 150 tx and maybe 20 rejects thanks a lot for helping with this.  I hope I can nail it down.

[kimosan]

just done around 10 1k transactions

Did you get 10 payouts?

edit: Just had an awful run 5 of the last 12 were rejects.  I had to update the logging as implode wasn't working in a multidimensional array.

So far this test has brought about 150 tx and maybe 20 rejects thanks a lot for helping with this.  I hope I can nail it down.

Good luck getting it all fixed. Back later if you need more testing.

[coinerd]

just done around 10 1k transactions

Did you get 10 payouts?

edit: Just had an awful run 5 of the last 12 were rejects.  I had to update the logging as implode wasn't working in a multidimensional array.

So far this test has brought about 150 tx and maybe 20 rejects thanks a lot for helping with this.  I hope I can nail it down.

Good luck getting it all fixed. Back later if you need more testing.

ok, thanks for your help kimosan

[coinerd]

The large amounts are me, im trying to see what happens if i send over limit, also i have learned that by sending too large of amounts you will not have them returned lol

Refunds should be processing without issue.  They are always made from the original input - 10% for fees and change.

If you had one not process it's a big clue for me that fees on fresh coins are probably part of this issue.  I'll have an eye out for any rejected refunds especially that's a good catch.

Again thanks for everyone that is taking time to help with this.

[jdebunt]

Status: 5/onbevestigd, broadcast through 16 node(s)
Date: 1/08/2013 22:38
To: iEBoRWFz6GyT1ESYWEkVtjy5pgkesFj7v7
Debit: -1000.00 IFC
Net amount: -1000.00 IFC
Transaction ID: 90f6ffd3005938eaf9c920e7a3574ef632c8f201f6b1f218ed8be81777a3e6e6

no response from the game :<

[coinerd]

Status: 5/onbevestigd, broadcast through 16 node(s)
Date: 1/08/2013 22:38
To: iEBoRWFz6GyT1ESYWEkVtjy5pgkesFj7v7
Debit: -1000.00 IFC
Net amount: -1000.00 IFC
Transaction ID: 90f6ffd3005938eaf9c920e7a3574ef632c8f201f6b1f218ed8be81777a3e6e6

no response from the game :<

That's two that are not logged at all.

I'm glad I decided to call for testers before "Releasing" this version.

[jdebunt]

That's two that are not logged at all.

I'm glad I decided to call for testers before "Releasing" this version.

glad you did aswell

It didn't ask for any TX fee on that transactions, perhaps that could be part of the reason? I'm not sure...

Edit :

Status: 4/onbevestigd, broadcast through 17 node(s)
Date: 1/08/2013 22:47
To: iEBoRWFz6GyT1ESYWEkVtjy5pgkesFj7v7
Debit: -150.00 IFC
Net amount: -150.00 IFC
Transaction ID: 227f2657b5bc433ed242a6ad3d4904b747b92bb5986c4c22aa8e59293288c636

didn't make it through either i guess?

[coinerd]

That's two that are not logged at all.

I'm glad I decided to call for testers before "Releasing" this version.

glad you did aswell

It didn't ask for any TX fee on that transactions, perhaps that could be part of the reason? I'm not sure...

No I mean fees from my end.  This is the second one that the script has apparently "missed".

The issue I was looking for is (more and more presumably) a fee issue - the script automatically includes a .1 fee with every outgoing tx - I'm sure it's not trying to re-use inputs so I'm guessing those times when the protocol wants more than .1 for a fee is the likely cause of these rejects.

Logging from the daemon is pretty poor in this area it's not helpful.  But I do know I've seen fees of up to 9.8 IFC for a transaction consisting of a ton of p2pool payouts.

I'm guessing that since the payout always includes the bet tx as an input, it's a fee issue for coins that are "too new" impacting the payouts.

As to why it's skipped two transactions from the queue, I have no farking idea.  the TX have slowed down, probably another 15 minutes or so and I'll shut'er down for some further analysis.

[coinerd]

That's two that are not logged at all.

I'm glad I decided to call for testers before "Releasing" this version.

glad you did aswell

It didn't ask for any TX fee on that transactions, perhaps that could be part of the reason? I'm not sure...

Edit :

Status: 4/onbevestigd, broadcast through 17 node(s)
Date: 1/08/2013 22:47
To: iEBoRWFz6GyT1ESYWEkVtjy5pgkesFj7v7
Debit: -150.00 IFC
Net amount: -150.00 IFC
Transaction ID: 227f2657b5bc433ed242a6ad3d4904b747b92bb5986c4c22aa8e59293288c636

didn't make it through either i guess?

3rd that's not logged, I was hoping that was a reject.


Hold your coins guys this test is over.  The script will be completely unresponsive in 2-3 minutes.

[jdebunt]

well i'm off to bed now, will look in this topic tomorrow morning & if it's safe to run again, i'll make sure i get to atleast 50k in wagers

[coinerd]

well i'm off to bed now, will look in this topic tomorrow morning & if it's safe to run again, i'll make sure i get to atleast 50k in wagers

ok I have several things going on and I doubt I'll get to the bottom of this today.

Thanks again for your time, don't worry about the extra transactions, and enjoy the free IFC!