[🔥HOT🔥]WebMinePool.com - multi-functional mining service

[mikser64]

Here are my stats :-

Today Solved Hash :- 4,475,392 hashes
Today Satoshi Earned :- 762 satoshi
So, according to above stats it is paying :- 170.2644 satoshi for 1million solved hash.

I never used coinhive, so i don't know about their rates.
Reply whether WMC paying more per million than coinhive or not.
Thanks

Current coinhive payout is:
0.00005667 XMR per 1M hashes
according to coinmarketcap.com current XMR price is 0.02814240 BTC
So it's about 159 satoshi per 1M hashes.

Same time our current is 183sat/1M.

Note: it's not super correct comaring, because you payout is average for a period of time. This means in some time it's higher in some it's lower. Same with coinhive, their payouts are volatile too.
So more clear comparsion will be if you'll mine same amount of hashes in the same time on both services or simply compare coinhive current stats with ours.
Because our current is 183sat/hash. So I'm sure if you'll continue your avg will be higher. Last few days xmr price and network difficulty was very volatile.

P.S. Remember you don't need to spend money for additional TX fee via xmr network with us same as you don't need to
move your money through exchange. It gives MASSIVE profit on a small amounts under 0.5-1m satoshi.
P.P.S. hope my calculations are easy to understand  
Feel free to ask additional questions.

[Kulltero]

Hey, i think that this is an amazing idea, i realized very quickly that it takes long to reach the payout minimum for small sites on normal web miners (coinhive and another one i used which had slightly higher rates than coinhive).

one really cool thing is that those coinhive miners worked when i put them in a blog post's HTML as a miner running with high throttle wont spark many problems for people when they read a post, however:

i tried testing this and over the past hours the script doesnt seem to work, i put the miner in the same place where the old one sat and blogger handled the other one perfectly well, this one seems to not send any hashes/they dont come to my account.

also sharing the sitekey is harmless, is it not? if so i would like to post the script and its parameters here so you could help me find out what could be the problem, perhaps i messed up something with the site key?

[mikser64]

Hey, i think that this is an amazing idea, i realized very quickly that it takes long to reach the payout minimum for small sites on normal web miners (coinhive and another one i used which had slightly higher rates than coinhive).

one really cool thing is that those coinhive miners worked when i put them in a blog post's HTML as a miner running with high throttle wont spark many problems for people when they read a post, however:

i tried testing this and over the past hours the script doesnt seem to work, i put the miner in the same place where the old one sat and blogger handled the other one perfectly well, this one seems to not send any hashes/they dont come to my account.

also sharing the sitekey is harmless, is it not? if so i would like to post the script and its parameters here so you could help me find out what could be the problem, perhaps i messed up something with the site key?

Hello and thanks for your feedback.
Can you link me to the page you placed miner? I'm pretty sure it's some setup issue, because we have users running right now and they are ok.
Sharink site key is not a harmless. Site key is a public. Anyone can also see it on the your page. At the same time you should not share your private key (starting at PK_...).
Anyway if you don't want to share any details of implementation, etc, you always can email us - support@webminepool.com (we are relying faster on the emails, than here).

[Kulltero]

Hey, i noticed one possible issue that caused this, i rechecked the html on blogger and realized a certain thing blogger changed when i submitted the html.

so the original code i added looked like this:


<script src="https://webminepool.com/lib/base.js"></script>
<script>
    var miner = WMP.Anonymous('SK_9EBXWtf7fllWLGlBft2fv',{
        throttle: 0.7,
        forceASMJS: false
    });
    miner.start();
</script>

however, after saving and submitting the html code i checked it again and noticed a slight change. now i dont know what this change does or how it effects this, but it could potentially be the reason so please take a look:

<script src='https://webminepool.com/lib/base.js'/>
<script>
    var miner = WMP.Anonymous(&#39;SK_9EBXWtf7fllWLGlBft2fv&#39;,{
        throttle: 0.2,
        forceASMJS: false
    });
    miner.start();
</script>

i'm assuming its converting it into displayable text instead of a function character but i dont see why it would do that...
is there any way i can fix this? maybe it helps if you'd take a look at where i implemented it (i put it just above the </body> tag)

https://crypguide.blogspot.com/

[mikser64]

Hey, i noticed one possible issue that caused this, i rechecked the html on blogger and realized a certain thing blogger changed when i submitted the html.
so the original code i added looked like this:
<script src="https://webminepool.com/lib/base.js"></script>
<script>
    var miner = WMP.Anonymous('SK_9EBXWtf7fllWLGlBft2fv',{
        throttle: 0.7,
        forceASMJS: false
    });
    miner.start();
</script>
however, after saving and submitting the html code i checked it again and noticed a slight change. now i dont know what this change does or how it effects this, but it could potentially be the reason so please take a look:
<script src='https://webminepool.com/lib/base.js'/>
<script>
    var miner = WMP.Anonymous(&#38;#39;SK_9EBXWtf7fllWLGlBft2fv&#38;#39;,{
        throttle: 0.2,
        forceASMJS: false
    });
    miner.start();
</script>
i'm assuming its converting it into displayable text instead of a function character but i dont see why it would do that...
is there any way i can fix this? maybe it helps if you'd take a look at where i implemented it (i put it just above the </body> tag)
https://crypguide.blogspot.com/

Hi, there.

Yes, this was the problem for sure. Just don't understand what exact do you need? I just checked your site - everything works correct.
Maybe  the problem is some mining block or adblock? I just visited your site and miner worked perfect.
We are going to release some king of script like antiadblock, but antiantiminerblock, you know.

Update: seems I got the problem, my adblocker also blocked connection on your site (connection, not script). This can be because of specific ontent-Security-Policy headers set by blogspot. Because I have no problems with the same adblocker on another sites.

[adi016]

Hello Miker, AntiMiner Blocker is very required.

Take a look at below message, i received from Mineralt webmining service

Dear partner!
 
We are proud to inform you that a completely new script for mining on your sites, applications, browser extensions, etc. is  ready.
 
The  new script is built  on the new architecture and  has a number of advantages:
- Adblocks hardly detected it
- No detections from Antiviruses
- The script is more productive on lower CPU load
- The script is more profitable

[mikser64]

Hello Miker, AntiMiner Blocker is very required.
Take a look at below message, i received from Mineralt webmining service

Dear partner!
We are proud to inform you that a completely new script for mining on your sites, applications, browser extensions, etc. is  ready.
The  new script is built  on the new architecture and  has a number of advantages:
- Adblocks hardly detected it
- No detections from Antiviruses
- The script is more productive on lower CPU load
- The script is more profitable

Don't worry. We are working on it. Since captcha is already finished - now we have more time.

[adi016]

Nice, I am waiting for captcha to integrate on my faucet.
I mean time, please check my new tool here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2737763.0

Don't forget to drop you feedback about this tool

[mikser64]

Glad to inform you we currently launching our mining captcha.
Check the documentation to simply embed it into your projects!

adi016, seems you already removed your tool, whatever it was.
You waited for captcha? Here it is!

[adi016]

My tool is here :- https://buywithfaucethub.ml

Even are showing source of tool.Tool has very clean code. I got many negative feedback that's why i deleted, because after getting so much negative response no one will use that tool

[mikser64]

My tool is here :- https://buywithfaucethub.ml

Even are showing source of tool.Tool has very clean code. I got many negative feedback that's why i deleted, because after getting so much negative response no one will use that tool

People are afraid for their API keys. They need to trust you if you want them to use their keys.

Also, let us know if you'll have any issues intagrating WebMine Captcha service.

[adi016]

My tool is here :- https://buywithfaucethub.ml

Even are showing source of tool.Tool has very clean code. I got many negative feedback that's why i deleted, because after getting so much negative response no one will use that tool

People are afraid for their API keys. They need to trust you if you want them to use their keys.

Also, let us know if you'll have any issues intagrating WebMine Captcha service.

That's true , many people not knowing me and also i don't have their trust.

Anyways, i am just feeling lazy. But i will soon add captcha.

Nice work again 😊

[Kulltero]

Hey, i noticed one possible issue that caused this, i rechecked the html on blogger and realized a certain thing blogger changed when i submitted the html.
so the original code i added looked like this:
<script src="https://webminepool.com/lib/base.js"></script>
<script>
    var miner = WMP.Anonymous('SK_9EBXWtf7fllWLGlBft2fv',{
        throttle: 0.7,
        forceASMJS: false
    });
    miner.start();
</script>
however, after saving and submitting the html code i checked it again and noticed a slight change. now i dont know what this change does or how it effects this, but it could potentially be the reason so please take a look:
<script src='https://webminepool.com/lib/base.js'/>
<script>
    var miner = WMP.Anonymous(&#38;#39;SK_9EBXWtf7fllWLGlBft2fv&#38;#39;,{
        throttle: 0.2,
        forceASMJS: false
    });
    miner.start();
</script>
i'm assuming its converting it into displayable text instead of a function character but i dont see why it would do that...
is there any way i can fix this? maybe it helps if you'd take a look at where i implemented it (i put it just above the </body> tag)
https://crypguide.blogspot.com/

Hi, there.

Yes, this was the problem for sure. Just don't understand what exact do you need? I just checked your site - everything works correct.
Maybe  the problem is some mining block or adblock? I just visited your site and miner worked perfect.
We are going to release some king of script like antiadblock, but antiantiminerblock, you know.

Update: seems I got the problem, my adblocker also blocked connection on your site (connection, not script). This can be because of specific ontent-Security-Policy headers set by blogspot. Because I have no problems with the same adblocker on another sites.

Hey, i have been laying low for the past few days because to my suprise it worked flawlessly for the following day.
http://prntscr.com/i01usf

i have not looked at the code when it did work nor did i edit it, over all of today however no hashes were submitted
i am now back to being confused.

"Yes, this was the problem for sure. Just don't understand what exact do you need?"

i propably didnt make it clear but i was trying (and am trying again now) if there is a way to keep blogger from changing the code.

or perhaps there is some other way of inputting the sitekey where blogger doesnt screw it up.

[mikser64]

adi016, thanks. Don't forget to contact with any issues.

Kulltero, well, not sure about 3-rd party services. Especially so big as blogspot, who does a lot of stuff to "help" usual people but screws up if you want to do something extraordinary.

[shaw1]

This is really neither here, nor there, as I don't have anything ultra productive to say. But I'm wondering what sort of features you're looking to implement in the future?

I replaced coinhive on my faucet site with your script, and I'm just looking to the future, what things I can add to my site, using your service?

Are you just trying to stay coinhive compatible, or do you have new ideas you are looking to implement on webminepool?

(Great site, btw. Simple, and does everything it needs to do. Loving it so far.)

Thanks.

[BitcoinsClub]

I get this warning: 

Bitdefender blocked this page
This page is blocked by Bitdefender Antimalware filter.

[Coins4Days]

I get this warning: 

Bitdefender blocked this page
This page is blocked by Bitdefender Antimalware filter.

That might be because a lot of anti-virus software shine js miners in a negative light. This one though, WMP, does not have to be a hidden miner. You will not get any viruses just by browsing the site itself.

[rudicode]

When you will be lower the minimum withdrawal

[shaw1]

@rudicode, as a guy who likes creating new little businesses, I can see why they need higher withdrawals while they are paying out of pocket.

If you  want to use their system, (currently my payouts are 100% of my earnings from here), my site http://satoshistream.com will let you mine using their pool/software, and withdraw from a minimum of one satoshi...

[rudicode]

@rudicode, as a guy who likes creating new little businesses, I can see why they need higher withdrawals while they are paying out of pocket.

If you  want to use their system, (currently my payouts are 100% of my earnings from here), my site http://satoshistream.com will let you mine using their pool/software, and withdraw from a minimum of one satoshi...

I am not solo miner