|
January 04, 2018, 06:03:47 AM |
|
"IF IT'S NOT BROKEN, WHY FIX IT??"
Telling isn't it???
Shifting 'burden' to centralized servers, means that there will no longer be equal nodes, that some 'full nodes' will be more equal than others, ... hmmm
Old times will know, but then I guess its fine if they keep tinkering with BCH and turn it into a centralized block-chain ran by exchanges and casinos ( aka day trader BTC flop houses ), ...
Good thing that BITCOIN-CORE will remain classic?
As soon as you have centralized servers of high density data, then things will no longer be 'open' but they're hardly open,
The deal is "GAVIN" is rich now, and rich peoples biggest problem ain't getting MORE, its keeping what they got and controlling it,
Instead of thinking like Satoshi, it appears that GAVIN is thinking more like Buterin, or a Federal Reserve Banker
Anyway so long as this trend towards centralization is kept in BCH ( bitcoin cash aka china asic king-pins ) I guess its fine, ... right?
***
Animal Farm said "Some blocks are MOAR EQUAL than others, Gavin suggests 4 legs good, 2 legs bad"
“node operators hand-pick one or more semi-trusted nodes to get fast boot-strapping.”
So some NODES MOAR trusted than others, what happened to +50% consensus? Sounds like a rat-pack collective is going to be deciding who is to be trusted??? Wait, wasn't the ENTIRE AGENDA of BTC to be a TRUST-LESS ENVIRON??
What the HELL is going on, oh that's RIGHT "WHEN YOU BECOME RICH, EVERYTHING CHANGES, INCLUDING YOUR MIND"
|