Bitcoin Forum
July 02, 2024, 04:56:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [~32 TH] HHTT - Selected Diff/Stratum/PPLNS/Paid Stales/High Availability/Tor  (Read 29736 times)
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2014, 05:19:58 AM
 #281

Well the point of p2pool is that everyone should run their own p2pool and not connect to someone else running it, right?

p2Pool is not viable for smaller miners, so a p2Pool proxy is a good alternative.

Ah okay. I've not used it myself. How much hash power should someone have for it to be viable to run yourself?

Most p2Poolers say a share per day should be the minimum. I'm not sure what that means currently, but from the chart below you can see that the bulk of the p2Pool miners are above 100 Ghps.



Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
fireduck
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 251



View Profile
January 14, 2014, 06:35:43 PM
 #282

2) The p2pool does adjust share difficulty, but on a global basis.  So with just my miners attached, everyone who connected will see about 1k share difficulty, which is again problematic for small miners.

I suppose you mean the difficulty for each worker, since it reads like node-basis (i.e with your miners...).
Actually everyone can adjust this by append the number they want to the username (address or not),
for example, 13qnEgPTxJW6mm88dLpnHXZyryN5EXBciq+16
But I think it just make the graphs looks nicer for small miners  Wink


Ah, didn't know that.  But that auto adjust to something to keep the graphs pretty would be very nice.

Bitrated user: fireduck.
iongchun
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 75
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 17, 2014, 05:06:04 AM
 #283


I suppose you mean the difficulty for each worker, since it reads like node-basis (i.e with your miners...).
Actually everyone can adjust this by append the number they want to the username (address or not),
for example, 13qnEgPTxJW6mm88dLpnHXZyryN5EXBciq+16
But I think it just make the graphs looks nicer for small miners  Wink


Ah, didn't know that.  But that auto adjust to something to keep the graphs pretty would be very nice.

This can be done easily, but such a "big pool" feature might not be suitable for p2ool,
I guess it is why forrestv does not implement or hear the request.

You could try --miner-share-rate or --address-share-rate in auto-worker-diff branch of my git fork:
https://github.com/iongchun/p2pool.git

Bitcoin: 1NFMpJUW7sTKmnVKj12MxhPvCvzAKQ5gUV
Namecoin: N5Tnt3JyMeizsoAFAZDr7CSxjzDtPSisK8
Mining with P2Pool. Graph. Blocks.
ahmed_bodi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500

Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.


View Profile
February 26, 2014, 09:22:59 AM
 #284

Not mined here but seeing a pool close is sad. (i'm an altcoin pool op myself)

Maybe this would help you to open a mini pool piggybacking off the p2pool net?

https://github.com/dogestreet/proxypool

Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.
roy7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 26, 2014, 01:36:45 PM
 #285

2) The p2pool does adjust share difficulty, but on a global basis.  So with just my miners attached, everyone who connected will see about 1k share difficulty, which is again problematic for small miners.

I suppose you mean the difficulty for each worker, since it reads like node-basis (i.e with your miners...).
Actually everyone can adjust this by append the number they want to the username (address or not),
for example, 13qnEgPTxJW6mm88dLpnHXZyryN5EXBciq+16
But I think it just make the graphs looks nicer for small miners  Wink


Ah, didn't know that.  But that auto adjust to something to keep the graphs pretty would be very nice.

Hi fireduck, back when you posted I hadn't even looked at p2pool before but I've been into it a lot lately. I made a patch that addresses your point #2 above.

https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/pull/174

It's actually live on the whole VTC p2pool network and works well. I didn't do a similar change for the pseudo share difficulty (the one for graphing/etc) because I was concerned about the increase in bandwidth if a large public node suddenly went from globally 1 share per second to having 1 share per second per miner. Of course, normal pools tend to vardiff people to submit shares every few seconds anyway, so maybe I should do that. It's easily enough to change.
zvs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000


https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2017, 02:41:59 PM
 #286

Just noticed the website is still up!

http://hhtt.1209k.com/user-details.php?user=1Zevusze7BjTpp4srJhx4zkRBxpbgwU4A

Found Blocks

source   time   ok   win   error   difficulty   btc   found hash   block
sockthing/dub   2013-03-09 04:50:10   Y   Y      132   0.00074612   00000000 000000ff 0419cfbc   block
sockthing/iad   2013-03-01 09:09:37   Y   Y      257   0.00173999   00000000 000002b5 cf33afa0   block
pushpool   2013-02-10 00:49:18   Y   Y      65536   0.49519937   00000000 00000029 8cccf8dc   block
pushpool   2013-02-01 06:20:12   Y   Y      262   0.00218153   00000000 0000013b 69cbbd2a   block
pushpool   2012-09-30 06:59:02   Y   Y      4092   0.07071510   00000000 000001a2 ecb9c590   block


presently I shall ponder this under the tree of woe.


needs to be some nostalgia forum on here... and not archive.   Grin
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!