(XF₲) Fuego 🔥 Decentralized Privacy Banking Network (POW)

[aejontargaryen]

{"alt_blocks_count":164,
"difficulty":27135,
"grey_peerlist_size":4,
"height":53017,
"incoming_connections_count":8,
"last_known_block_index":53016,
"outgoing_connections_count":1,
"status":"OK",
"tx_count":108,
"tx_pool_size":0,
"white_peerlist_size":21}

[CryptoMan007]

Hello,

Is anyone able to compile the GUI wallet.
I saw the snapshots on the website it looks cool.
I am getting errors on compiling in ubuntu

[aejontargaryen]

Hello,

Is anyone able to compile the GUI wallet.
I saw the snapshots on the website it looks cool.
I am getting errors on compiling in ubuntu

yea, I've got it compiled on Ubuntu 14. I just upgraded to 16 again then noticed an issue with the overview frame of the wallet not displaying balance.
I'll see if I can get you a build onto github pretty quick.

Also, been considering a hard fork to bytecoin's code that uses rocksDB, and maybe some other config changes
This would give us a lot more connectivity to the rest of the Cryptonote community.
No time soon, maybe ~80k block height.

[cozzz]

Hello,

Is anyone able to compile the GUI wallet.
I saw the snapshots on the website it looks cool.
I am getting errors on compiling in ubuntu

yea, I've got it compiled on Ubuntu 14. I just upgraded to 16 again then noticed an issue with the overview frame of the wallet not displaying balance.
I'll see if I can get you a build onto github pretty quick.

Also, been considering a hard fork to bytecoin's code that uses rocksDB, and maybe some other config changes
This would give us a lot more connectivity to the rest of the Cryptonote community.
No time soon, maybe ~80k block height.

I've compiled GUI on ubuntu 16.04, it showed error during making.
I do all step follow the Dragonglasswallet github. The error messages show below.

Code:

...
[ 73%] Linking CXX static library libdragonglass.a
[ 73%] Built target dragonglass
make[2]: ***  No rule to make target '/home/xxx/clarence-dollars/build/release/src/miner', needed by 'qrc_resources.cpp'. Stop.
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:68: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/Dragonglasswallet.dir/all' failed
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Dragonglasswallet.dir/all] Error 2
Makefile:83: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2

It's seems the 'miner' file be wrong place. I copied all files in /home/xxx/dragonglass to /home/xxx/clarence-dollars and made it again.
Finally, It's complete built.

[CryptoMan007]

Hello,

Is anyone able to compile the GUI wallet.
I saw the snapshots on the website it looks cool.
I am getting errors on compiling in ubuntu

yea, I've got it compiled on Ubuntu 14. I just upgraded to 16 again then noticed an issue with the overview frame of the wallet not displaying balance.
I'll see if I can get you a build onto github pretty quick.

Also, been considering a hard fork to bytecoin's code that uses rocksDB, and maybe some other config changes
This would give us a lot more connectivity to the rest of the Cryptonote community.
No time soon, maybe ~80k block height.

I've compiled GUI on ubuntu 16.04, it showed error during making.
I do all step follow the Dragonglasswallet github. The error messages show below.

Code:

...
[ 73%] Linking CXX static library libdragonglass.a
[ 73%] Built target dragonglass
make[2]: ***  No rule to make target '/home/xxx/clarence-dollars/build/release/src/miner', needed by 'qrc_resources.cpp'. Stop.
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:68: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/Dragonglasswallet.dir/all' failed
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Dragonglasswallet.dir/all] Error 2
Makefile:83: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2

It's seems the 'miner' file be wrong place. I copied all files in /home/xxx/dragonglass to /home/xxx/clarence-dollars and made it again.
Finally, It's complete built.

Thanks, worked like a Charm:)

[CryptoMan007]

Hello,

Is anyone able to compile the GUI wallet.
I saw the snapshots on the website it looks cool.
I am getting errors on compiling in ubuntu

yea, I've got it compiled on Ubuntu 14. I just upgraded to 16 again then noticed an issue with the overview frame of the wallet not displaying balance.
I'll see if I can get you a build onto github pretty quick.

Also, been considering a hard fork to bytecoin's code that uses rocksDB, and maybe some other config changes
This would give us a lot more connectivity to the rest of the Cryptonote community.
No time soon, maybe ~80k block height.

Yes the balance is not visible.

[aejontargaryen]

I've been experimenting with a lot of different other wallet configs.
most of the reason for a hard fork.

still working on a fix for the balance.
thanks guys.

[aejontargaryen]

ok. fixed balance issue.

https://github.com/ZirtysPerzys/Dragonglasswallet

[gameparadise007]

ok. fixed balance issue.

https://github.com/ZirtysPerzys/Dragonglasswallet

Thank you

[CryptoMan007]

ok. fixed balance issue.

https://github.com/ZirtysPerzys/Dragonglasswallet

Works now, thanks

[aejontargaryen]

  valar dohaeris.


what are some exchanges you guys like/use?

[aejontargaryen]

the whole scene changes near daily, seems.  hard to keep up with {DRGL} development and trading.

[aejontargaryen]

yall just want to keep all your {DRGL} don't you? 
I understand... its small supply.  its collectible. 

[gameparadise007]

yall just want to keep all your {DRGL} don't you? 
I understand... its small supply.  its collectible. 

Yup like to collect my dragons 😀
I would appreciate one thing, the blockchain is very healthy and no issues as such.
There had been many new cryptonight coins launched recently and all were have problems like forks , stuck blockchains amd multiple resets.
{DRGL} is moving awesome with a healthy network.

Appreciate you work dev 😀
The block reward is less and the total supply is also less and we dont have nicehashers that kills a coin.
CPU mining is healthy for a coin as it distributes the coin evenly and not to only whales. Lets see till whn we have this opportunity to mine with cpu.

[Galapagos]

Hi! Not an exchanges guy, more a ..... keeper, long time investment is what I found to be the most profitable way.
I agree with Gameparadise007 about the good job done and the stability of the network, something that has become difficult to find in the latest crypto launch!! Good for us!
Thank you dev!

[aejontargaryen]

Likewise. Many thanks to all of you guys as well.
We don't require a fork at this point in time, i do agree.
We have quite some time remaining in our "distribution" phase.
That being said, we will eventually require a hard fork to implement standard functionality and usability features. Forks can be a great thing when done correctly.  

"Post-Great War" may be the most optimal time for us to do this -  as there are other planned surprises to be implemented "post-war"  

Yes indeed- a network that is healthy does certainly show value. Well done.  If anyone would like to add a seed node(s) to the code, let me know.  "46.126....." "158.108.1etc,etc" have as solid of a node as the main seed nodes - ever whose those are. And a few others too actually. Impressive.

also..

I had a thought of changing {Dragonglass} to {Drægonglass} or {DRÆGONGLASS}
i couldn't help but notice the Ægon bit....to push us more into GoT territory, & also 'advanced encryption'.
Might help w/distinction of "similar project name" confusion too.  
50/50 still, though.
What do you guys think?

[aejontargaryen]

ok.
Going to start working on getting a build of {DrægonglassWallet} Windows GUI executable.
Im still learning on Github,  let me know if anyone needs anything. https://github.com/aejontargaryen

[3Bullion]

The ecosystem is not very clear: where the money token will be spent, it is not known. They have no practical application. If you mean that you sell other shares on the exchange to other gamers, then very soon the mining will stop, as the number of tokens is limited and if more than 101 million tokens are in the hands of gamers, then the rule of getting the reward for the passed level will not work.

[3Bullion]

While these tokens do not appear to be able to sell through any exchange, it is better not to buy them. And even after the listing, we recommend to see how their value will change on the exchange.

[gameparadise007]

Likewise. Many thanks to all of you guys as well.
We don't require a fork at this point in time, i do agree.
As the plan has always been not to release to exchanges until around series debut, we have quite some time remaining in our mining/distribution phase.
That being said, we will eventually require a hard fork to implement standard functionality and usability features. Forks can be a great thing when done correctly.  "Post-Great War" may be the most optimal time for us to do this.

Yes indeed- a network that is healthy does certainly show value. Well done.  If anyone would like to add a seed node(s) to the code, let me know.  "46.126....." "158.108.1etc,etc" have as solid of a node as the main seed nodes - ever whose those are. And a few others too actually. Impressive.

I had a thought of changing {Dragonglass} to {Drægonglass} or {DRÆGONGLASS}
i couldn't help but notice the Aegon bit....to push us more into GoT territory & also the whole Æ tech of late.
Might help w/distinction of "similar project name" confusion too.  
50/50 still, though.
What do you guys think?

Yes, the new name looks good. It will be different from other project with same name