if you think linux is somewhat safer than windows, you got into false sense of security.
You obviously got no clue what you are talking about.
Alone the simple fact that 95%+ of malware is written for windows makes linux safer for storing sensible data.
Windows with 300+ processes from start up compared to 30 in UNIX makes it hard to guess which is more error-prone.
In fact, linux deemed more insecure than windows becaise it gives people false sense of security.
Completely retarded statement.
Studying history of linux and realizing how inconsistent, disorganized the linux files are spread out will give a picture.
UNIX and WIN are using different file systems. So what? Please educate yourself before posting nonsense.
You obviously never compared how file access is handled of WIN to UNIX.
I can back up my statement with technical disussion in forums I frequented, but I am too lazy for that and nor interested in arguing.
You surely can back up all your statements.. whether it makes sense is the question.
I'm glad you are not interested in arguing.. maybe go and read a bit about IT security regarding WIN/UNIX kernel ?
Be aware that it is not my word and I am simply relaying.
You should rather start thinking about the stuff you read on the internet instead of simply quoting it.