Decrease Population

[startblouse8]

Population to be decreased we need to have an essential family planning and not more than 2 children per family.

[1715319605]

1715319605

[furrystocks]

Join the terrorist group and do a series of bombing LOL You would get paid for it too ;p

[accuracygranulated7]

the ratio of born is to death is too much higher. I think we need to stop having children because we cant kill those who are living

[bankbytecode5]

I dont know why people are not using protection while having sex. it would protect child birth and even provide pleasure to each couples as usual

[loftyboliv]

There is no way because with the advancement of medical science the rate of death is much lesser or extended. So delaying senescense.

[squog]

Best way to decrease a population? Do you mean effectivity or morally? If we're talking about effectivity there are alot of it available. There are nuclear weapons with a bonus fall out in the end. There is weaponized diseases that could off millions in a span of weeks. There is of course wars, just say you have oil and there you go. But i guess the efdective way to decrease a population without killing them off is to enforce a reinforcement to adopting or having only one child.

[berkcelik16]

Human hunger is the major problem because of the high population

[lovepale]

Super typhoons and the coming big one earthquake. This is what I think the best way to decrease the population in the world. The natural phenomena can do it in a twinkling of an eye. Natural calamities is the only way to do it if the people couldn't do such nuclear bomb. Or missile one country to start the decrease of population. This seems selfish idea but seems like true. Seems applicable but seems not right. People can make it through power and strength, it can be also by the natural calamities big and harmful effects will leave the people.

[dashywashy]

Over-population is the one of those big problems in the world. The best way to decrease or to control the incease of population is we need to know the family planning. Family planning makes a important role in our lives. Most of the people nowadays they did'nt know how to value family. Some of them want to have many kids but they didn't want to work or they unemployed because they did not finish there education.

[s.mahmood]

At present population is the most alarming issue in the world. so anyhow we should control high population. I think family planning can reduce the population I,e one child rule.

[Sithara007]

At present population is the most alarming issue in the world. so anyhow we should control high population. I think family planning can reduce the population I,e one child rule.

None of the countries, with the exception of China had the courage to implement a strict one-child policy. India tried it in 1977, when Sanjay Gandhi was having power. But it ended very badly for him, and it ruined his political career.

[BADecker]

One of the best ways is to spread nano-size aluminum and barium and strontium particles in the air, so that people breath them, penetrating into their reproductive organs, which will cause their children to become infertile.

Scientists Now Argue Merits Of Spraying Aerosols Into Atmosphere To Cool Is OK

As the world grapples with different strategies to mitigate the warming climate, few have sparked such controversy in recent times as solar geoengineering.

The proposed plan would use aerosols, fired into the stratosphere with high-flying aircraft, to cool the planet by blocking radiation from the sun.

It would essentially mimic the effects seen after volcanic eruptions – but, an analysis published at the beginning of this year warned that the approach could have grave consequences.

If the plan to artificially cool Earth were abruptly stopped, the experts warned it could trigger extreme warming at rates far more dramatic than the current climate is changing, in a phenomenon known as the 'termination shock.'

But now, some scientists have hit back, arguing that the risk might not be as it seems.

Read more at https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2018/03/13/scientists-now-argue-merits-of-spraying-aerosols-into-atmosphere-to-cool-is-ok/.

[popcorn1]

One of the best ways is to spread nano-size aluminum and barium and strontium particles in the air, so that people breath them, penetrating into their reproductive organs, which will cause their children to become infertile.

Scientists Now Argue Merits Of Spraying Aerosols Into Atmosphere To Cool Is OK

As the world grapples with different strategies to mitigate the warming climate, few have sparked such controversy in recent times as solar geoengineering.

The proposed plan would use aerosols, fired into the stratosphere with high-flying aircraft, to cool the planet by blocking radiation from the sun.

It would essentially mimic the effects seen after volcanic eruptions – but, an analysis published at the beginning of this year warned that the approach could have grave consequences.

If the plan to artificially cool Earth were abruptly stopped, the experts warned it could trigger extreme warming at rates far more dramatic than the current climate is changing, in a phenomenon known as the 'termination shock.'

But now, some scientists have hit back, arguing that the risk might not be as it seems.

Read more at https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2018/03/13/scientists-now-argue-merits-of-spraying-aerosols-into-atmosphere-to-cool-is-ok/.

So why not spray countires with high population rates?
So why do they invite so many immigrants to the UK USA  ?

Ready for some TIN FOIL?..

I thinks the spraying is to give us cancer so the big companies don't have to pay the workers a life pension..

Just think if you work then retire at 65 the company could be paying 30 years of monies to thousands of employers ,,
Now what if 30 massive companies get together and give cancer to all it's workers the money they save ,,

An Employee Dies, and the Company Collects the Insurance - DealBook
https://dealbook.nytimes.com/.../an-employee-dies-and-the-company-collects-the-insu...
22 Jun 2014 - But critics say it is immoral for companies to profit from the death of employees, while employees themselves do not directly benefit. And despite a law enacted in 2006 that sought to curb the practice — companies now are restricted to insuring only the highest-paid 35 percent of employees, who must give .

THE TRICKS THESE SUPER RICH PLAY..All about the monies almost EVERYTHING IN LIFE..

The things peoples do for monies     no wonder we are all suspicious ..

[BADecker]

One of the best ways is to spread nano-size aluminum and barium and strontium particles in the air, so that people breath them, penetrating into their reproductive organs, which will cause their children to become infertile.

Scientists Now Argue Merits Of Spraying Aerosols Into Atmosphere To Cool Is OK

As the world grapples with different strategies to mitigate the warming climate, few have sparked such controversy in recent times as solar geoengineering.

The proposed plan would use aerosols, fired into the stratosphere with high-flying aircraft, to cool the planet by blocking radiation from the sun.

It would essentially mimic the effects seen after volcanic eruptions – but, an analysis published at the beginning of this year warned that the approach could have grave consequences.

If the plan to artificially cool Earth were abruptly stopped, the experts warned it could trigger extreme warming at rates far more dramatic than the current climate is changing, in a phenomenon known as the 'termination shock.'

But now, some scientists have hit back, arguing that the risk might not be as it seems.

Read more at https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2018/03/13/scientists-now-argue-merits-of-spraying-aerosols-into-atmosphere-to-cool-is-ok/.

So why not spray countires with high population rates?
So why do they invite so many immigrants to the UK USA  ?

Ready for some TIN FOIL?..

I thinks the spraying is to give us cancer so the big companies don't have to pay the workers a life pension..

Just think if you work then retire at 65 the company could be paying 30 years of monies to thousands of employers ,,
Now what if 30 massive companies get together and give cancer to all it's workers the money they save ,,

An Employee Dies, and the Company Collects the Insurance - DealBook
https://dealbook.nytimes.com/.../an-employee-dies-and-the-company-collects-the-insu...
22 Jun 2014 - But critics say it is immoral for companies to profit from the death of employees, while employees themselves do not directly benefit. And despite a law enacted in 2006 that sought to curb the practice — companies now are restricted to insuring only the highest-paid 35 percent of employees, who must give .

THE TRICKS THESE SUPER RICH PLAY..All about the monies almost EVERYTHING IN LIFE..

The things peoples do for monies     no wonder we are all suspicious ..

They are spraying countries with high population rates, right along with the rest of the countries.

They need to spray all countries because their excuse is global warming. People would see through their excuse if they only sprayed certain countries.

[summerbloom]

we think to provide decreasing population all nation has implemented the birth control policy to each nation to make the possible solution of this problem(over population) to decreases them population and sterilize them included that they have only 1-2 kids per couple and make them to  get reward from the government as follower the rules and regulation,,and whose person dos'nt follow do the punishment without violence their human rights,

[stephylarde]

What do you think is the best way to decrease population?

A long-term population decline is typically caused by sub-replacement fertility, coupled with a net immigration rate that fails to compensate the excess of deaths over births. A long-term decline is accompanied by population aging and creates an increase in the ratio of retirees to workers and children

[Sithara007]

we think to provide decreasing population all nation has implemented the birth control policy to each nation to make the possible solution of this problem(over population) to decreases them population and sterilize them included that they have only 1-2 kids per couple and make them to  get reward from the government as follower the rules and regulation,,and whose person dos'nt follow do the punishment without violence their human rights,

Sterilizing people can be suicidal for the elected governments. The last time someone did that was in Peru during the 1990s. Alberto Fujimori tried to control the high birth rates of the rural population and in the end he was jailed for this.

What do you think is the best way to decrease population?

A long-term population decline is typically caused by sub-replacement fertility, coupled with a net immigration rate that fails to compensate the excess of deaths over births. A long-term decline is accompanied by population aging and creates an increase in the ratio of retirees to workers and children

Congrats! Never seen a better copy-paste else where. Original source is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_decline

[BADecker]

Climate change control is about reducing the population through making the people non-fertile. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2748857.msg32375382#msg32375382

[illbaker8]

There is no way because with the advancement of medical science the rate of death is much lesser or extended. So delaying senescense.

[TiceOwil]

maybe these views can work:

1. End all policies that reward parents financially based on the number of children they have. Governments can preserve and even increase tax and other financial benefits aimed at helping parents by linking these not to the number of children they have, but to parenthood status itself.

2. Integrate lessons on population, environment, and development into school curricula at multiple levels. Refraining from advocacy or propaganda, schools should educate students to make well-informed choices about the impacts of their behavior, including childbearing, on the environment.

3. Put prices on environmental costs and impacts. In quantifying the cost of an additional family member by calculating taxes and increased food costs, couples may decide that the cost of having an additional child is too high. Such decisions, freely made by women and couples, can decrease birth rates without any involvement by non-parents in reproduction.