Bitcoin Forum
May 14, 2024, 05:42:24 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: So confused with Power Limit Watts in Simple Mining for GTX 1060.  (Read 283 times)
healimonster (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 3


View Profile
January 14, 2018, 08:55:31 PM
 #1

If I set the overclocking power limit in SMOS to 200 it will use that power limit for a larger card like my 1070 and then apply a default power limit to smaller cards. I think my 1050ti get's applied a 75 watt power limit automatically (which seems to work fine) and it will apply a 140watt limit for the 1060 6gb. Under this setting the 1060 produce about 300 sol's and use 2.45 watts according to the SMOS console window.

When I drop the power limit on the 1060's to underclock and save some energy the exact opposite happens. I will set the power limit to 75 watts for the 1060's and they produce less sols as expected but the console says they are using more watts. now they show up at 260-280 Sol's but are using 3.65 watts according to the console.

How is that possible? Lower power limit, fewer sol's (that part makes sense), but more watt's. Clearly I am not an electrical engineer.

Is the console watt reading and AVG watt display accurate?

To make things more confusing when I allow simple mining apply the default wattage to the 1060's cards the cards run hotter and the fans spin at a loud 80% or higher and draw the lower 2.45 watts. When I set the power limit to 75 watts. The cards run cooler and the fans spin at around 30% which makes sense (cooler = lower fans) but the cards are drawing about 1 watt more when compared to the card running with the fan screaming away 80%+. That doesn't seem possible. A card that is cranking it's fan to the max uses fewer watts than a card with the fans barely running?



Any explanations to this weird watt usage and tips to have these cards run quiet and efficient would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Heali
1715665344
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715665344

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715665344
Reply with quote  #2

1715665344
Report to moderator
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715665344
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715665344

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715665344
Reply with quote  #2

1715665344
Report to moderator
1715665344
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715665344

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715665344
Reply with quote  #2

1715665344
Report to moderator
Troy1307
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 14, 2018, 09:08:30 PM
 #2

The 2.45 or 3.65 you see is not watts. It is sols per watt. Which means if you are doing 300 sols/s and using 140 watts, your sols/watt is 300/140=2.14.

The idea is that you can optimize your rig to be more power efficient by getting your sols/watt higher even if it lowers you sols/s a bit.

healimonster (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 3


View Profile
January 14, 2018, 11:35:26 PM
 #3

The 2.45 or 3.65 you see is not watts. It is sols per watt. Which means if you are doing 300 sols/s and using 140 watts, your sols/watt is 300/140=2.14.

The idea is that you can optimize your rig to be more power efficient by getting your sols/watt higher even if it lowers you sols/s a bit.


Poof! Mind Blown!

It's Sol Per Watt. Higher is better.  duh.

So the console knows and reports Sol's per watt but doesn't report watt usage anywhere?

Interesting.

Troy1307
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 05:42:52 AM
 #4

Watt usage should be(or be very close to) the value of power limit set in the overclock settings. Since your GPU will be running full power it will likely be using the most wattage that it can. So if you set 100, it should be using 100W.
healimonster (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 3


View Profile
January 15, 2018, 03:57:36 PM
 #5

Poof! Mind Blown!

It's Sol Per Watt. Higher is better.  duh.


No lower is better right? If a rig is producing 1000 sol  1000s/2.0w    is better than 1000s/4.0w
Correct?

I am still confused how if the rig is left to a default power limit of 140watts  and it  does 300/2.45  vs 275/3.6 which one is better?

If you are trying to save electricity the 275/3.6 is better?

300/2.45  =122.44
275/3.6 = 76
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!