Bitcoin Forum
December 08, 2016, 12:33:54 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Idea: Bit debt  (Read 896 times)
nog_lorp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7


View Profile
July 10, 2011, 06:27:37 PM
 #1

Simple implementation: allow transfers of negative amounts, with no coins backing them. To repay a debt, you specify the transaction representing that debt in the metadata, and send money to the address requested / originating. To acknowledge a debt, pay 1 satoshi or a similar small quantity. Through block exploration, debt could be managed and debt consolidation could be smoothed.
1481157234
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481157234

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481157234
Reply with quote  #2

1481157234
Report to moderator
1481157234
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481157234

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481157234
Reply with quote  #2

1481157234
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481157234
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481157234

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481157234
Reply with quote  #2

1481157234
Report to moderator
1481157234
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481157234

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481157234
Reply with quote  #2

1481157234
Report to moderator
1481157234
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481157234

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481157234
Reply with quote  #2

1481157234
Report to moderator
rnd0000
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
July 10, 2011, 07:44:40 PM
 #2

Related, there probably could be some automated solution for issuing bonds and all the spectra of financial instruments
being automated and hardcoded into bitcoin(like) system. The need for banks will be even less then, as all the overhead.
Notary services come next to the mind...

Everyone will just have a supercomputers at home to make sure the world transactions are proven.

If you do like my ideas: 1JTGkHyjftsbect7S2PCghYr7Tuyqf4rF5
If you don't: 1BHaMrxrKzVfWTxHBYFuXKezxkF1FQcg3x
Serith
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 269


View Profile
July 10, 2011, 08:30:03 PM
 #3

Simple implementation: allow transfers of negative amounts, with no coins backing them. To repay a debt, you specify the transaction representing that debt in the metadata, and send money to the address requested / originating. To acknowledge a debt, pay 1 satoshi or a similar small quantity. Through block exploration, debt could be managed and debt consolidation could be smoothed.
There is no way to enforce debt collection, so sending negative amount of bitcoins would be simular to sending invoice. I think it would be easier to create third party software solution with it's own protocol that will act as extension to open source bitcoin client.
Omneybus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6


View Profile
July 10, 2011, 09:02:56 PM
 #4

interesting idea, although I don't think it is very useful to send an invoice (or debit like you pointed out). It could lead to unstable deals if you aren't going to pay the invoice.
cinos11
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
July 11, 2011, 12:41:53 AM
 #5

This would not turn out good.
I could just keep deleting my wallet.dat and make new ones.
This would in a sense create infinite spending.
bitrain
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308



View Profile
July 11, 2011, 01:27:26 AM
 #6

No,no,no.. transfers of negative amounts isn't about bitcoin. We don't need it. Period Smiley.

nog_lorp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7


View Profile
July 12, 2011, 02:24:24 AM
 #7

Simple implementation: allow transfers of negative amounts, with no coins backing them. To repay a debt, you specify the transaction representing that debt in the metadata, and send money to the address requested / originating. To acknowledge a debt, pay 1 satoshi or a similar small quantity. Through block exploration, debt could be managed and debt consolidation could be smoothed.
There is no way to enforce debt collection, so sending negative amount of bitcoins would be simular to sending invoice. I think it would be easier to create third party software solution with it's own protocol that will act as extension to open source bitcoin client.

That is the silliest thing I've ever heard. Simpler to make an additional protocol? Lol. It could be done without changing the blockchain!

Enforcement is NOT an issue, which is exactly why it doesn't matter if you need it. Invoices are incredibly useful. Don't go making new protocols when bitcoin has this stuff in mind.
macharborguy
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
July 16, 2011, 06:02:11 PM
 #8

Okay, so lets say I was able to send BitCoins I didn't have.  Then what?  I now have a negative balance in my Wallet.  What if I drop out of BitCoin right there and never receive bitcoins to fill the whole.  What I have effectively done was CREATE bitcoins without the work of mining them.

Bad and unusable idea all together.

1AqpBsJ26Tde7rHYrVJFuoRKD54TcykZT1
nafai
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112



View Profile
July 16, 2011, 06:34:59 PM
 #9

You guys are missing the point. You don't ACTUALLY spend negative coins or get a negative balance. Rather, a transaction where the bitcoin amount sent is negative is just noted in the blockchain but doesn't actually affect anyone's balance. I send you -5 bitcoins doesn't change my balance or yours, it's just a way of recording that I think you owe me 5 bitcoins (or I acknowledge I owe you that much depending on how it would be set up).

It's like sending an IOU on a piece of paper. It doesn't change your bank account, it's just an IOU. Could be valid or invalid, there are other ways you could tack on verification methods or rate limiting. I don't even know WHY you'd want a debt to be recorded in the blockchain, actually. But it wouldn't necessarily have to affect your balance, it's just like a note.

1HQiS9PLHPcoQMgN8ZdcGwhoMHWh2Hp37p
Vladimir
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812


-


View Profile
July 16, 2011, 06:39:22 PM
 #10

Better think how could you implement whatever it is you need on top of bitcoin protocol not within it. There must be a VERY compelling reason i.e. "life or death of bitcoin" kind to get any significant changes into the protocol at this point.


-
nog_lorp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7


View Profile
August 04, 2012, 12:04:34 AM
 #11

Gravedig! I'm reasonably certain it would not require any changes to the protocol whatsoever, just changes to the client.
FreeMoney
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


Strength in numbers


View Profile WWW
August 04, 2012, 01:02:13 AM
 #12

You guys are missing the point. You don't ACTUALLY spend negative coins or get a negative balance. Rather, a transaction where the bitcoin amount sent is negative is just noted in the blockchain but doesn't actually affect anyone's balance. I send you -5 bitcoins doesn't change my balance or yours, it's just a way of recording that I think you owe me 5 bitcoins (or I acknowledge I owe you that much depending on how it would be set up).

It's like sending an IOU on a piece of paper. It doesn't change your bank account, it's just an IOU. Could be valid or invalid, there are other ways you could tack on verification methods or rate limiting. I don't even know WHY you'd want a debt to be recorded in the blockchain, actually. But it wouldn't necessarily have to affect your balance, it's just like a note.

That and other sorts of messages don't need to be stored by tons of people for ever. No one else wants or needs to hear about that.

It might be slightly meaningful if someone had identity of some sort attached to the owing address. Then you could use that info to increase your confidence that someone who is owed by it will be able to pay you, but this all seems unlikely and it's not the purpose of the chain anyway.

Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone.
Bitni
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57



View Profile
August 04, 2012, 04:33:23 AM
 #13

Fiduciary bitcoins? It seems to be against the main idea of BTC.

http://pyramining.com/referral/2kgt76zpe    2012-08-03 07:46:07 UTC    still active
http://pyramining.com/referral/nrh3exms2    2012-08-03 07:46:07 UTC    still active
http://pyramining.com/referral/e6nza2kpb    2012-08-03 07:46:07 UTC    still active
http://pyramining.com/referral/naptbhr6x    2012-08-03 07:46:07 UTC    still active
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!