Mr_Burst
|
|
January 18, 2018, 12:36:57 PM |
|
Bitholddev - there are many other good exchanges besides Craptopia. Sample - https://www.coinexchange.io Young coins will good start way with it. But greedy smart-ass dev want pump coin and faster sell his premine, so he goes to Craptopia
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin-Pool
|
|
January 18, 2018, 01:12:25 PM |
|
We changed Our MiningPool Server to New Hardware ( Xeon1230v6, 32gb DDR4 Ram, 480GB SSD in RAID and GIGABIT Upload!! )
Now We are online agian. Algo: C11 stratum+tcp://85.214.211.186:3573 -u YOUR_WALLET_ADDRESS -p c=BHD
|
|
|
|
xkreed
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
January 18, 2018, 01:15:30 PM |
|
bsod.pw constant problems with all coins . Very buggy pool. On protopool all payments come normally.
I can confirm this. Had several troubles with bsod last week. But protopool works great and no problems with payouts or other stuff. I'm still mining this coin, looking forward for the first exchange. Regards, krd.
|
|
|
|
Supercoiner111
|
|
January 18, 2018, 01:39:18 PM |
|
C11 Algo a new algo? Any relation to x11?
|
|
|
|
stivensons
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 1
|
|
January 18, 2018, 01:57:47 PM |
|
bsod.pw constant problems with all coins . Very buggy pool. On protopool all payments come normally.
I can confirm this. Had several troubles with bsod last week. But protopool works great and no problems with payouts or other stuff. I'm still mining this coin, looking forward for the first exchange. Regards, krd. Your opinion, you can keep it to yourself, it's not interesting to me.
|
|
|
|
navydude
|
|
January 18, 2018, 01:59:51 PM |
|
C11 Algo a new algo? Any relation to x11?
Same algo used for Chain Coin CHC.
|
|
|
|
Kenrich
|
|
January 18, 2018, 02:01:20 PM |
|
C11 Algo a new algo? Any relation to x11?
Same algo used for Chain Coin CHC. hello bro ,how to mine ,any tools? this is my first look this algo,thanks!
|
|
|
|
crd007
|
|
January 18, 2018, 02:09:04 PM |
|
C11 Algo a new algo? Any relation to x11?
Same algo used for Chain Coin CHC. hello bro ,how to mine ,any tools? this is my first look this algo,thanks! CCMiner knows this algo (if you use Nvidia) AMD no clue .. (myabe sgminer?)
|
|
|
|
|
OLDARH
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 101
-YAHOO_EU-
|
|
January 18, 2018, 04:30:56 PM |
|
The protopool is lower by 20% hash.)))
I confirm, on this pool always an understated hash, on all algorithms.
|
|
|
|
Commie
|
|
January 18, 2018, 04:34:47 PM |
|
I guess all smart-arse fudders screaming about existing masternodes are either too dumb or too lazy to check and see this:
int64_t GetMasternodePayment(int nHeight, int64_t blockValue) { int64_t ret = 0;
if (nHeight < 1000) { ret = 0; } else if (nHeight >= 1000 && nHeight <= 10000) { ret = blockValue / 4; // MN Reward 25% } else if (nHeight > 10000 && nHeight <= 30000) { ret = blockValue / 2; // MN Reward 50% } else if (nHeight > 30000) { ret = blockValue * 3 / 4; // MN Reward 75% } return ret; }
Where the hell y'all come from, silly ignorant people...
|
|
|
|
BrokeA$$Miner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
January 18, 2018, 04:43:32 PM |
|
I guess all smart-arse fudders screaming about existing masternodes are either too dumb or too lazy to check and see this:
int64_t GetMasternodePayment(int nHeight, int64_t blockValue) { int64_t ret = 0;
if (nHeight < 1000) { ret = 0; } else if (nHeight >= 1000 && nHeight <= 10000) { ret = blockValue / 4; // MN Reward 25% } else if (nHeight > 10000 && nHeight <= 30000) { ret = blockValue / 2; // MN Reward 50% } else if (nHeight > 30000) { ret = blockValue * 3 / 4; // MN Reward 75% } return ret; }
Where the hell y'all come from, silly ignorant people...
and what exactly do you think this shows ? Since we're already past block 1600, that shows the mastnode payout at 25%. So any existing nodes (including the devs, presumably) should be splitting 25% of the block rewards.
|
|
|
|
Commie
|
|
January 18, 2018, 05:00:07 PM |
|
I guess all smart-arse fudders screaming about existing masternodes are either too dumb or too lazy to check and see this:
int64_t GetMasternodePayment(int nHeight, int64_t blockValue) { int64_t ret = 0;
if (nHeight < 1000) { ret = 0; } else if (nHeight >= 1000 && nHeight <= 10000) { ret = blockValue / 4; // MN Reward 25% } else if (nHeight > 10000 && nHeight <= 30000) { ret = blockValue / 2; // MN Reward 50% } else if (nHeight > 30000) { ret = blockValue * 3 / 4; // MN Reward 75% } return ret; }
Where the hell y'all come from, silly ignorant people...
and what exactly do you think this shows ? Since we're already past block 1600, that shows the mastnode payout at 25%. So any existing nodes (including the devs, presumably) should be splitting 25% of the block rewards. It only shows that no MN income was planned before the auction. Well, the estimation was a bit wrong and now there's a few hours gap, how devs will handle it I don't know but I'm sure there will be a solution from them, like burned coins or something like that. Won't be many of them anyway. I'm more concerned about the daemon fix, TBH
|
|
|
|
drago777
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 11
|
|
January 18, 2018, 05:14:01 PM |
|
Hi, I've done the Italian translation but my wallet is out of synch and haven't received the bounty
|
|
|
|
|
Flemmer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
January 18, 2018, 05:27:46 PM |
|
bsod.pw stopped mining this shit, dev has taken it away from the 1st page.
|
|
|
|
protopool.net
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 0
|
|
January 18, 2018, 05:29:46 PM Last edit: January 19, 2018, 07:11:19 PM by protopool.net |
|
I confirm, on this pool always an understated hash, on all algorithms.
It doesn’t affect on payouts, because we pay for the total hashrate percent. So it’s mean that if hashrate for all miners in your pool are shown lower than 10%, the total hashrate of the pool is lower on 10%. Hashrate is an abstract value. If 10 Mh/s from 1000 Mh/s is 1%, so 9 Mh/s from 900 Mh/s is 1% too. It’s an elementary math.
|
|
|
|
BrokeA$$Miner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
January 18, 2018, 05:35:51 PM |
|
It only shows that no MN income was planned before the auction. Well, the estimation was a bit wrong and now there's a few hours gap, how devs will handle it I don't know but I'm sure there will be a solution from them, like burned coins or something like that. Won't be many of them anyway. I'm more concerned about the daemon fix, TBH
Ahh - I was trying to figure out what people were being called ignorant for, since the code seemed to backup their arguements... and I agree, these coin 'devs' really need to spend more time on testnet before rushing to release... The last 2-3 days, I've tried like 3 dash clones, and all had pretty basic errors on release. Bad enough you gotta fight ASICs and NiceHash, now you gotta fight the code too... edit: btw - wouldn't the easy 'fix' just be to shut off the dev masternodes till after the auction? Killing a daemon isn't exactly hard...
|
|
|
|
Commie
|
|
January 18, 2018, 05:53:21 PM |
|
It only shows that no MN income was planned before the auction. Well, the estimation was a bit wrong and now there's a few hours gap, how devs will handle it I don't know but I'm sure there will be a solution from them, like burned coins or something like that. Won't be many of them anyway. I'm more concerned about the daemon fix, TBH
Ahh - I was trying to figure out what people were being called ignorant for, since the code seemed to backup their arguements... and I agree, these coin 'devs' really need to spend more time on testnet before rushing to release... The last 2-3 days, I've tried like 3 dash clones, and all had pretty basic errors on release. Bad enough you gotta fight ASICs and NiceHash, now you gotta fight the code too... edit: btw - wouldn't the easy 'fix' just be to shut off the dev masternodes till after the auction? Killing a daemon isn't exactly hard... Dash has a very complicated code with lots of versions that are not quite compatable with each other. Some of devs realise that at the end of prep work (if they actually want to change anything, that is), others don't bother and just grab the code and change few names while still calling themselves "developers" lol ASICs and Nicehash... Well this is exactly why I saw C11 and jumped on it Shutting off masternodes after newly sold ones are operable and can support the network is an obvious decision, I was talking about the coins mined during this time gap.
|
|
|
|
BrokeA$$Miner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
January 18, 2018, 05:56:26 PM |
|
Shutting off masternodes after newly sold ones are operable and can support the network is an obvious decision, I was talking about the coins mined during this time gap.
yeah - I was under the impression the auction hadn't completed yet. I meant shutoff/turn off the devs masternode daemons/VPSs till the auction completes so no more coins get added to the problem. Though I suppose if you gotta do a burn, its just as easy to burn 1,000,000 coins as it is to burn 1 coin.
|
|
|
|
|