Lauda, Come In Here A Moment

[Cyberczar]

I just logged into my account and saw your comment and negative trust on my account that read,
"Offering "ICO bumping" services, also known as paid shill bumping. This is a highly shady offer which helps generate fake buzz for various projects".

Now let's get this right, Lauda. I work for ICOs but have never offered bumping service. Secondly, your paid shill bumping is inaccurate. Rather what happened was that I  responded to a harmless looking advert to advertise a business which I later discovered was inappropriate and willingly disengaged. I'm not particularly concerned if you believe me or not. However, I think you should use your discretion.

Working for ICOs should not necessarily mean doing something illegal or encouraging or even supporting anything inappropriate. As humans, some of us are still guided by our consciences.

This is for the records. I actually liked what you do on this forum as you my find out from some comments I made in this forum, however if you are tagging members arbitrarily that is most inappropriate. In any case, I think we all are humans prone to mistake, but do use your status painstakingly.

Tagging people who are innocent would rather make the trust system lose potency because people thus tagged would not always believe that the system is always right. That negates the effort at keeping things the way we privately desire. I am not asking you to untag me, though I think you should. It means little one way or the other. Just that you need to be more careful. This may mean a lot to some folks here.

[TryNinja]

I work for ICOs but have never offered bumping service.

Then what is that? https://imgur.com/skFpg14 🤔

The neg trust looks perfectly valid.

[Cyberczar]

I work for ICOs but have never offered bumping service.

Then what is that? https://imgur.com/skFpg14 🤔

The neg trust looks perfectly valid.

What I meant there is that I never advertised (offered) such a service. If  look at it well, responding to an advert such as that doesn't mean ill. There really was no inking that was something illegitimate, was there?

[Vod]

Well, do you sincerely believe that if at that moment, I knew it was something illegal that I would have made that offer?

It's not illegal - it's untrustworthy.

You take away the ability for people to properly measure the popularity of an ICO.  :/

[TheUltraElite]

First this thread title made me feel strange - Like seriously you are inviting Lauda into coming to this thread? Hell now Lauda would never come to your thread - lauda is a kitty after all

Second you are associated with ANN bumping service - shitposting and spamming the ANN to make it look legitimate in front of thousands of people in this forum who are potential investors and thus gaining false popularity and a huge brain dead shillbase with the project. This makes the project untrustworthy and thus you got a negative trust. Stop crying like a child and accept it.

Nobody is getting tagged unnecessarily check out the reference to know more about the people who had been dug up - but I doubt you have the brains to read that because you are obviously a cash grabbing shitposter who does nothing but add more filth to this forum which is already swimming six feet under this ocean of shit.