Can cryptos destroy the invasive marketing?

[paxmao]

I am in favour of marketing campaigns, but I am not in favour of harassing people at every corner. It seems that the marketers have become quite wild. Could decentralisation help with this?

[iamTom123]

I am in favour of marketing campaigns, but I am not in favour of harassing people at every corner. It seems that the marketers have become quite wild. Could decentralisation help with this?

I am too is not in favor with invasive type of marketing strategies being implemented by many companies online or offline. The best marketing will always be permission marketing where both sides know the parameters of what they are doing and there is no coercion whatsoever...convincing people has to be based on merits and not on hypes. Now, we already have some marketing companies about to use the blockchain technology for their platforms and hopefully there would be a new day dawning for the marketing industry -- with the help of the blockchain, that is. I am not a good marketer but am always fascinated with marketing strategies that work and of course those that don't so we can learn from them. Block chain as applied in marketing will be a new frontier and I understand there are some ICO projects along this line...let's see how things will be developing on this as we know that marketing industry is a huge one and definitely one of the industries we can't help but experience everyday.

[Hydrogen]

I am in favour of marketing campaigns, but I am not in favour of harassing people at every corner. It seems that the marketers have become quite wild. Could decentralisation help with this?

A more decentralized government would be tougher for campaign contributors or special interest lobbyist groups to control. The more centralized power in a state the easier it is for said power to be exploited or abused. We see this in dictatorships and totalitarian regimes, the centralization of power leads to abuse. Republics like the united states where power is more decentralized between a President, joint chiefs of staff, a senate and other bodies typically makes exploitation and abuse of power more difficult.

A more decentralized state, which was harder for special interests to influence, could lead to laws being passed which would do more to protect public privacy and regulate aggressive or invasive marketing.

[Granxis]

I do not think that the crypto money used in the right direction will be harmful, we all use the online bank all the time, everyone wants to do safer and faster transactions. You just need the correct and stable crypto moneys.

[davis196]

I am in favour of marketing campaigns, but I am not in favour of harassing people at every corner. It seems that the marketers have become quite wild. Could decentralisation help with this?

No,it can`t help,because decentralization has nothing to do with marketing.Actually,agressive marketing methods are used to promote new cryptocurrencies and new ICOs.The "invasive" marketing (used in a good way) can help for growing the crypto industry.I`m OK with the invasive marketing campaigns,as long as they promote good crypto related products and services,not scams and garbage.   

[Ranly123]

I do not think that the crypto money used in the right direction will be harmful, we all use the online bank all the time, everyone wants to do safer and faster transactions. You just need the correct and stable crypto moneys.

I think of it like the way you say. Money earned through crypto is not harmful to the economy and in the market itself. As we all know many people used and transact on online shops so crypto is always benificial to our economy too.

[paxmao]

I am in favour of marketing campaigns, but I am not in favour of harassing people at every corner. It seems that the marketers have become quite wild. Could decentralisation help with this?

I am too is not in favor with invasive type of marketing strategies being implemented by many companies online or offline. The best marketing will always be permission marketing where both sides know the parameters of what they are doing and there is no coercion whatsoever...convincing people has to be based on merits and not on hypes. Now, we already have some marketing companies about to use the blockchain technology for their platforms and hopefully there would be a new day dawning for the marketing industry -- with the help of the blockchain, that is. I am not a good marketer but am always fascinated with marketing strategies that work and of course those that don't so we can learn from them. Block chain as applied in marketing will be a new frontier and I understand there are some ICO projects along this line...let's see how things will be developing on this as we know that marketing industry is a huge one and definitely one of the industries we can't help but experience everyday.

Exactly! There are many ICO projects out there in at least two spheres that affect the marketing. Firstly, the tokenised add payments, and secondly the identity services. I think that these can have an influence on invasive marketing. I would like to hear more views on this, as I deeply dislike it for promoting useless comsuption.

[onpages]

I am in favour of marketing campaigns, but I am not in favour of harassing people at every corner. It seems that the marketers have become quite wild. Could decentralisation help with this?

very agree with you, that a lot of current marketing is going wildly. it has resulted in many scammers taking advantage of the situation.

I've heard, there will be a blockchain technology that aims to filter either a good ICO project or a scam, so maybe this helps a bit in the matter.

[BTCbengi]

I love marketing campaigns. However, in order to do this, it is necessary to undergo training and learning. Most people are ignoring this step and working massively. This can be annoying to the people around them and making them not like it. Therefore, it is necessary to filter and set reasonable standards for everyone to do the job well

[paxmao]

I love marketing campaigns. However, in order to do this, it is necessary to undergo training and learning. Most people are ignoring this step and working massively. This can be annoying to the people around them and making them not like it. Therefore, it is necessary to filter and set reasonable standards for everyone to do the job well

Do you really think that you need to undergo training just to avoid spamming around? Do you need to study how not to send adds to people that don´t want them nor need them?

[Jake.bluees]

It is overwhelming, I fully understand the point of advertising and although this benefits 100% of companies (those who make profits for advertising) but the consumer is exhausting, we are constantly exposed to advertising by all means, even at download programs, watch videos on youtube, use the web, I totally agree that there should be a control for this, a limit.

[dogandogru]

Inasive marketing is mostly adopted by Scam concerns. These Scammers want to raise the funds quickly, therefore they use these annoying marketing techniques to raise money fast.