she knows very well about bitcoin because she is from the same university where this comes from 
http://www.politico.com/morningmoney/0813/morningmoney11456.html2nd section is on bitcoin specifically - I recommend following the link provided to this great analysis of Bitcoin for regulators:
http://mercatus.org/ then click on main feature "Bitcoin: A Primer for Policymakers" which is a PDF I think all regulators need to read.
Quote
FIRST LOOK: BITCOIN POLICY PRIMER FROM MERCATUS -- As Washington gets to know Bitcoin better, the Mercatus Center at George Mason University is releasing a “primer” for policymakers Tuesday. Mercatus senior research fellow Jerry Brito and program associate Andrea Castillo warn that applying existing rules to the digital “cryptocurrency” could impede its development. Bitcoin doesn’t fit into any existing regulatory category – it’s not a foreign currency, traditional commodity or a payments network – and they said policymakers may want to consider a new regulatory category.
They also urged policymakers not to “overreact” to illicit uses of Bitcoin and said regulators need to consider the criminal uses alongside its legitimate uses. In addition, they said lawmakers and regulators should consider whether it’s necessary to preempt state-by-state licensing for Bitcoin businesses — what they call one of the technology’s “greatest obstacles.” The full report:
http://bit.ly/19C3rodBITCOIN 101 — Don’t know what a Bitcoin is, much less why the government is interested? POLITICO’s Zachary Warmbrodt breaks it down:
http://politi.co/1bK5PGB
which leads to the PDF at http://mercatus.org/publication/bitcoin-primer-policymakers
which leads to the 48-page Bitcoin primer for policymakers. I found a lot to like, so here is but one example:Quote
As we have seen, Bitcoin does not easily fit into existing regulatory boxes. That is often the hallmark of a disruptive technology. Indeed Bitcoin is a revolutionary technical achievement that heralds amazing potential benefits to human welfare.
