Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 05:16:41 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Path to better Efficiency  (Read 151 times)
NODEhaven (OP)
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 12


View Profile
January 23, 2018, 02:48:29 PM
Last edit: January 24, 2018, 12:53:58 AM by NODEhaven
 #1

The foundries are currently ramping up their 1st Generation 7nm Production and it looks from an article just put out by Scotten Jones that most of the volume targeting the 7nm process node is waiting for EUV in 2019.  Check slide 13.  

Will manfacturers be able to continue to get better efficiency from Bitcoin miners by moving to these more advanced nodes?  My first inclination is to say yes.  Moving to 7nm is going to help achieve better efficiency.

The glitch to this thesis that I am trying to wrap my head around is The E-bit E10 18T.  They say they are using 10nm Samsung chips but are only able to get 10% better efficiency than the 16nm TSMC Antminer S9. On TSMC website they say that moving from 16nm to 10nm gives ~35% better efficiency. http://www.tsmc.com/english/dedicatedFoundry/technology/10nm.htm

Why didn't E-bit achieve better efficiency than that what they are announcing?  Do you think they compromised efficiency to increase speed to shave some money on silicon? Or is the Samsung 10nm that overrated?

Their cost is also another issue.  With E-Bit E10 18T miners for March release sold out at price near $5000.

https://www.semiwiki.com/forum/files/Scott%20Jones%20ISS%202018%20Presentation.pdf

1714108601
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714108601

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714108601
Reply with quote  #2

1714108601
Report to moderator
1714108601
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714108601

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714108601
Reply with quote  #2

1714108601
Report to moderator
1714108601
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714108601

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714108601
Reply with quote  #2

1714108601
Report to moderator
If you want to be a moderator, report many posts with accuracy. You will be noticed.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714108601
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714108601

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714108601
Reply with quote  #2

1714108601
Report to moderator
1714108601
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714108601

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714108601
Reply with quote  #2

1714108601
Report to moderator
1714108601
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714108601

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714108601
Reply with quote  #2

1714108601
Report to moderator
fanatic26
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 560


View Profile
January 23, 2018, 05:47:50 PM
 #2

Especially if Bitcoin price drops further and difficulty remains the same.


This will never happen so that theory can be put to bed.

Stop buying industrial miners, running them at home, and then complaining about the noise.
NODEhaven (OP)
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 12


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 12:29:05 AM
 #3

Title of the thread wasn't good so I changed it to "Path to better efficiency"

As far as the theory should I have said, "If Bitcoin price keeps falling and difficulty keeps rising?"


Sandal_Hat
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 118


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 04:07:28 AM
 #4

The foundries are currently ramping up their 1st Generation 7nm Production and it looks from an article just put out by Scotten Jones that most of the volume targeting the 7nm process node is waiting for EUV in 2019.  Check slide 13.  

Will manfacturers be able to continue to get better efficiency from Bitcoin miners by moving to these more advanced nodes?  My first inclination is to say yes.  Moving to 7nm is going to help achieve better efficiency.

The glitch to this thesis that I am trying to wrap my head around is The E-bit E10 18T.  They say they are using 10nm Samsung chips but are only able to get 10% better efficiency than the 16nm TSMC Antminer S9. On TSMC website they say that moving from 16nm to 10nm gives ~35% better efficiency. http://www.tsmc.com/english/dedicatedFoundry/technology/10nm.htm

Why didn't E-bit achieve better efficiency than that what they are announcing?  Do you think they compromised efficiency to increase speed to shave some money on silicon? Or is the Samsung 10nm that overrated?

Their cost is also another issue.  With E-Bit E10 18T miners for March release sold out at price near $5000.

https://www.semiwiki.com/forum/files/Scott%20Jones%20ISS%202018%20Presentation.pdf



I guess their chips juz not as good as bitmain?

Selling 100 dollar coupons (8units expire 11th June, 14 units expire 1st july) and 125 dollar coupon (2 unit exp 30th June). Selling at 20% of value
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!