Hang on, my rep was lowered unfairly

[jimmy55]

I cannot post in the thread giving me negative trust.  It is totally unfair and how do I "challenge" the person giving me negative trust?  Yes I advertised a service and then I provided it to some people.  You had no prof AT ALL as to how I accelerated the transactions.  I had multiple happy people with what I helped them with.  I did not post anywhere else or use other "FREE" services to accelerate.  This is completely unfair.  I did not SPAM the free service either like so many people were doing.

[Joel_Jantsen]

I cannot post in the thread giving me negative trust.  It is totally unfair and how do I "challenge" the person giving me negative trust?  Yes I advertised a service and then I provided it to some people.  You had no prof AT ALL as to how I accelerated the transactions.  I had multiple happy people with what I helped them with.  I did not post anywhere else or use other "FREE" services to accelerate.  This is completely unfair.  I did not SPAM the free service either like so many people were doing.

Speaking of the title,

my rep was lowered unfairly

(You didn't have any!)

It's simple,if you think you were not spamming them using other free services,you can either post here or PM the person that gave you negative trust about the method  you were using to accelerate the transactions.If they're convinced,your feedback should be restored.Don't fuss about it.

[timerland]

I cannot post in the thread giving me negative trust.  It is totally unfair and how do I "challenge" the person giving me negative trust?  Yes I advertised a service and then I provided it to some people.  You had no prof AT ALL as to how I accelerated the transactions.  I had multiple happy people with what I helped them with.  I did not post anywhere else or use other "FREE" services to accelerate.  This is completely unfair.  I did not SPAM the free service either like so many people were doing.

Then prove that you aren't using a free transaction accelerator? How are you otherwise able to accelerate these transactions? Do you own an army of miners or is the owner of one of the most prominent mining pools? If not, then you must be using a free accelerator.

Nobody would give you negative trust if you weren't provoding this service. Period.

Look at how many people are already offering a free(tips) transaction acceleration service already. Do you really think that it helps to have another one to flood the entire services section with free acceleration threads?

If you want this neg trust removed, talk to lauda.

[jimmy55]

I cannot post in the thread giving me negative trust.  It is totally unfair and how do I "challenge" the person giving me negative trust?  Yes I advertised a service and then I provided it to some people.  You had no prof AT ALL as to how I accelerated the transactions.  I had multiple happy people with what I helped them with.  I did not post anywhere else or use other "FREE" services to accelerate.  This is completely unfair.  I did not SPAM the free service either like so many people were doing.

Then prove that you aren't using a free transaction accelerator? How are you otherwise able to accelerate these transactions? Do you own an army of miners or is the owner of one of the most prominent mining pools? If not, then you must be using a free accelerator.

Nobody would give you negative trust if you weren't provoding this service. Period.

Look at how many people are already offering a free(tips) transaction acceleration service already. Do you really think that it helps to have another one to flood the entire services section with free acceleration threads?

If you want this neg trust removed, talk to lauda.

The burden should not be on me to prove anything.  He says I was using free acceleration services but he has no proof so it's him that is doing something fraudulent.

[Aventhe]

I cannot post in the thread giving me negative trust.  It is totally unfair and how do I "challenge" the person giving me negative trust?  Yes I advertised a service and then I provided it to some people.  You had no prof AT ALL as to how I accelerated the transactions.  I had multiple happy people with what I helped them with.  I did not post anywhere else or use other "FREE" services to accelerate.  This is completely unfair.  I did not SPAM the free service either like so many people were doing.

Then prove that you aren't using a free transaction accelerator? How are you otherwise able to accelerate these transactions? Do you own an army of miners or is the owner of one of the most prominent mining pools? If not, then you must be using a free accelerator.

Nobody would give you negative trust if you weren't provoding this service. Period.

Look at how many people are already offering a free(tips) transaction acceleration service already. Do you really think that it helps to have another one to flood the entire services section with free acceleration threads?

If you want this neg trust removed, talk to lauda.

The burden should not be on me to prove anything.  He says I was using free acceleration services but he has no proof so it's him that is doing something fraudulent.

All you have to do is prove that you were NOT using a free acceleration service. If you were not, then the trust will be removed. I'm not saying you did or did not do anything, it's just there have been plenty of people scamming the community recently, so everything has to be taken with a grain of salt. It's hard to differentiate the legit ones from the scammers.

I have complete confidence in Lauda that he/she will remove your trust if you just explained how you accelerate transactions...

[SFR10]

It is totally unfair and how do I "challenge" the person giving me negative trust?

By providing the needed proof.

You had no prof AT ALL as to how I accelerated the transactions.

Then show us...

I had multiple happy people with what I helped them with.

That's what you think. Will cite some of them further down (that you didn't help, although you pretended).

I did not post anywhere else or use other "FREE" services to accelerate.

Evidence?

This is completely unfair.

What you did, is unfair. This is justice. Majority just use free services and hope for tips from new users that have no idea (sounds unfair to me).

I did not SPAM the free service either like so many people were doing.

The burden should not be on me to prove anything.  He says I was using free acceleration services but he has no proof so it's him that is doing something fraudulent.

You're wrong. Keep dodging the questions and everything remains the same.
Based on your replies (on your thread): https://archive.fo/o3rtc#selection-2313.0-2609.21

1. You posted the following:

I assume you saw these are all set.  Happy to help.

You're all set too.  

In other words, directly saying that you're the reason why those three transactions got their 1st confirmation (which it isn't the case).

These two transactions got their 1st confirmation in less than a minute (both had good fees, so there's no way you had anything to do with these):
https://blockchain.info/tx/592cdb86190aec274435400470603c643fdb8c20ada6d7fd368e7925bd366fa6
https://blockchain.info/tx/cf0c83490c4a7a9e478eaa96a60997ab64883b77c2480927f33efd27d16157a4

The following was mined by SlushPool (in which doesn't have a free or paid accelerator):
https://blockchain.info/tx/bd4f3e2ce24ab85667ce9b55c52fafd47fcd6e28879f7aebff64fbf71c2dc3c7

2. You asked for a tip (for another similar case): https://archive.fo/4LuBj#selection-4193.0-4193.60
    The case: https://archive.fo/4LuBj#selection-4175.0-4181.230

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I would like to see Jimmy55 here show that he wasn't using a free accelerator, because I gave him something like $5 in DOGE for accelerating my transaction.  Either way, I'm too much of a crypto retard to get that sort of thing done on my own and I was grateful just to get those transactions confirmed.  If I was duped, I'm not going to cry about it but I'd like to see Jimmy55 admit to being deceitful.

[jimmy55]

It appears that you are all too dumb to realize what a burden of proof is.

[HCP]

Fairly sure most people understand the concept of "burden of proof"... it would just appear that there are differing opinions on who is supposed to bear that burden.

What you seem to be failing to grasp is that this isn't your average court of law... so all that cool stuff you've seen on TV about how the accused basically refuses to admit to anything and it's up to the prosecution to provide all the evidence... well, unfortunately for you, that doesn't apply here. The "burden of proof" is on you.

So, at this point you have 2 choices:

1. Provide the proof that has been requested
or
2. Live with the neg trust

[Lauda]

Fairly sure most people understand the concept of "burden of proof"... it would just appear that there are differing opinions on who is supposed to bear that burden.

It's easier for them to complain and not provide any proof whatsoever.
I'm not sure whether the above is worse or spamming the one who left you a rating with "Pls sir remove rating".