They could affect the value. I doubt any of the long term members will pay any attention to them, but they might sway new investors. I appreciate Kryptous being transparent with their metrics but wow... Here are my two satoshis:
There is no company or leadership behind the coin. But yet there is a quasi team leading it but no consensus in it’s direction.
Isn't it a good sign that it's thriving under this condition? If nothing else, this points to Bitcoin's resiliency despite all the FUD and hate that come its way.
Volatility is it’s name and it’s as likely to decrease in value in the near term (90 days) as it is likely to rise. It has a quickly falling market value percentage which is now in the low 30% range compared to 65% not long ago.
It's no less volatile than other cryptos, and why does the market share matter? That can be attributed to other projects gaining success and that doesn't take away anything from Bitcoin.
Slow speed for transaction and high cost.
This is misleading. It's true that transactions could be expensive or slow, but rarely both, especially now that the network has been fielding less transactions. High fee transactions are fast, low fee transactions are slow.
Huge negative factor of it’s creator Satoshi being absent from project.
I love Satoshi, but it would be hard to call a project with a clear head "decentralized." This point obviously has cons, but it also has pros.
Rumors persist it was possibly created by NSA and or CIA to track drug money, arms dealers and terrorists.
Rumor lol.
