No more signature campaign for Jr.members

[akram143]

I know,this thread should not be here but many junior member rank guys don't know meta section so just posting here to let them know.
Here after no signature link for junior membered rank people source : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178608.msg28792130#msg28792130
So I don't think signature campaign will hire Jr.member rank guys.

Merits are welcomed

[1714132336]

1714132336

[1714132336]

1714132336

[Parodium]

I think is probably beneficial for the forum. People will take more time to write more productive posts, then when it is deserved, they'll rank up to the next level.

I have seen Legendary members with absolutely disgraceful post quality, who still appear to know almost nothing about Bitcoin. I think that we'll start seeing fewer members like this in the long run.

[legendster]

I know,this thread should not be here but many junior member rank guys don't know meta section so just posting here to let them know.
Here after no signature link for junior membered rank people source : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178608.msg28792130#msg28792130
So I don't think signature campaign will hire Jr.member rank guys.

Merits are welcomed

If you think you can beg for Merit points with shit posts like these then keep dreaming buddy.

[BTCtrader9]

When Jr.Members are unable to put a signature, they would directly head to the Meta section to see what the change is.
I don't know how this thread makes any sense in the Marketplace section?

Also, Campaign managers are the first ones to read throughout and stay updated so I'm sure they won't be including Jr.Members in their signature campaigns anymore.

[PaypalForBTC]

Am I the  only one who doesn’t come to the forums to stress about every littl dollar?

Don’t you guys have jobs? Buy $50 of bitcoin

[yamte23]

I think it's for the best. Many users who participated in this forum has the intention to earn from signature campaigns.

I've read that merits are given to those people who deserves it. Based on your post I don't think you are.

[Mevz]

Are you trying to say that the Merit points would be included on the rules of the signature campaign? I think it is more hard when they put a qouta or required merit points based on your rank. Ex. our merit points is 100 because we are full members but the required merit based on our rank is 110 merit points so we should reach that merit points in order to be eligible on that campaign.

[speedy1987]

I know,this thread should not be here but many junior member rank guys don't know meta section so just posting here to let them know.
Here after no signature link for junior membered rank people source : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178608.msg28792130#msg28792130
So I don't think signature campaign will hire Jr.member rank guys.

Merits are welcomed

That is true but what to do. Merit system made all efforts with the posts alone. One side it may to avoid spaers in the forum but other side. DT members newly added using their power in wrong hand will do manipulate the merit system for them and their friends. I expect demerit should be added and if there is power misuse. We should be able to pull down from the DT list with that.
If it works like everyone can work independently without forcing of anyone.

When we had the 1million less users in the forum 2014. There was no power misuse by trusted member but recent days spammer and shit DT members shaking the reputation of this forum.

[ATSgrowth]

Maybe not?
As I remember there were some signature campaign which accept Newbie (although not much).
So there are still some chance to have signature campaign will accept Jr.

[Taki]

Well, the forum is modernising itself with time. As I remember the first change was an opportunity to set an avatar for low ranks for some little payment, then Copper member ranks, then

Jr Members can no longer have signature links.

, so it is like jr. member is the same like a newbie, and now this "merit". On Meta board there always a lot of suggestions about inproving of the forum's work and as I see some of them were accepted.

[bigmaster23]

No matter how much we spout the signature campaign for Jr. Member to just humbled help them it will not give, thus on the year 2014 there are less member of the forum so it is a big opportunity for a Newbie and Jr. Member that time and Einstein would not help you with that,

Are you trying to say that the Merit points would be included on the rules of the signature campaign? I think it is more hard when they put a qouta or required merit points based on your rank. Ex. our merit points is 100 because we are full members but the required merit based on our rank is 110 merit points so we should reach that merit points in order to be eligible on that campaign.

To be candid with you, I do foresee a situation like this with signature campaigns especially those run by some highhanded DT members. It may read something like you stated above or "If you don't get 5/10/15 merits while enrolled in this campaign you will lose your pay" kind of term. Let's keep watching as events unfold here.

the idea for for losing the pay at signature campaign would be pain in the ass, can we just save by a single Merit I hope there will be an idea for that, lets just observe.

[Traderpolo212]

Am I the  only one who doesn’t come to the forums to stress about every littl dollar?

Don’t you guys have jobs? Buy $50 of bitcoin

or scam someone else like you did with me? At least those people that stree about little dollar don't scam like shit like you

[cipher-x_09]

I think there are still some campaign managers who are offering services for junior members as you could see on the other open campaigns regardless even they didn't have a merit they still have a chance like you, me, and everybody else that we can make a constructive post that is worth giving merit or to join any campaigns like everybody else to proved our worth here in this forum.

[examplens]

No matter how much we spout the signature campaign for Jr. Member to just humbled help them it will not give, thus on the year 2014 there are less member of the forum so it is a big opportunity for a Newbie and Jr. Member that time and Einstein would not help you with that,

Are you trying to say that the Merit points would be included on the rules of the signature campaign? I think it is more hard when they put a qouta or required merit points based on your rank. Ex. our merit points is 100 because we are full members but the required merit based on our rank is 110 merit points so we should reach that merit points in order to be eligible on that campaign.

To be candid with you, I do foresee a situation like this with signature campaigns especially those run by some highhanded DT members. It may read something like you stated above or "If you don't get 5/10/15 merits while enrolled in this campaign you will lose your pay" kind of term. Let's keep watching as events unfold here.

the idea for for losing the pay at signature campaign would be pain in the ass, can we just save by a single Merit I hope there will be an idea for that, lets just observe.

You will not lose your payments without merit, but with merit, you can get a better reward from the campaign. Here is a sample: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2827626.0
Also, there has been slots for Jr.Member. Still possible to join in the signature campaign as a Junior.

[omitusaf]

I think is probably beneficial for the forum. People will take more time to write more productive posts, then when it is deserved, they'll rank up to the next level.

I have seen Legendary members with absolutely disgraceful post quality, who still appear to know almost nothing about Bitcoin. I think that we'll start seeing fewer members like this in the long run.

I suppose bounty hunters will also raise up the prizes especially now that its a little bit more difficult to meet the criteria. It would be so bad to get a few bucks after so much work done that is not commensurate with the amount of effort put in.