Plausibility of Syria strike / Sparking WWIII ?

[goxed]

Now that US concludes that Assad regime used chemical weapons, what do you think would be course of action by US.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-08-28/obama-concludes-assad-carried-out-chemical-attack

[blablahblah]

Now that US concludes that Assad regime used chemical weapons, what do you think would be course of action by US.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-08-28/obama-concludes-assad-carried-out-chemical-attack

The Russians save the day by adding more Risperidone to the US' water supply?

[TECSHARE]

I say it is likely. The strategy seems to be an attempt to bait Iran into joining the conflict in order to justify full scale invasion of Iran.

[Rampion]

Now that US concludes that Assad regime used chemical weapons, what do you think would be course of action by US.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-08-28/obama-concludes-assad-carried-out-chemical-attack

The US will just bomb Syria and send some random drone attacks to make sure nobody else dies. You know, its all about innocent people and their lives, its a humanitarian mission - as usual!

Glad Obama is such a smart, game-changing president with a very big heart (yes, we can!), and not that cold-blooded Bush psycho who was just into oil and $$$.

On a serious note: I think they might throw some bombs and wait and see, they might just be checking out Russia's and Iran's reaction. IMO there is no way they would ever go for a terrestrial occupation as per Iraq or Afghanistan, Hezbollah is too strong in Syria and they have plenty of money and weapons. US population ("the tax payers") are fed up of war, most do not buy that was indeed Al Assad who used chemical weapons as the ONU said there was no proof whatsoever, so the US cannot definitely afford another Iraq/Afghanistan... Or Vietnam. In my opinion they are just "testing the waters".

[BunworthBanshee]

I find it amazing how easy it is for the world to believe that Assad done this. Just put up a few images and that's it fact. Have any of you got family in Syria? NO because its bullshit this was not Assad it was the so called rebels.

Ask yourself this, if you where Assad and you knew only to well, that the war mongering US and its puppy dog allies where only itching to invade, why? what possible reason would you use the one thing that would give them reason to attack? Honestly would you do it if you where him? Think about it?

This is just pure propaganda bulshit, most of the so called rebels in Syria are Muslim extremists looking to build a state that will harbor anti western terrorists, the same people will gladly get in a plane tomorrow and kill any US or westerner.

WAKE UP and stop just believing the box in the corner of your rooms. Its all about Iran, remove Iran's No.1 ally and she is weaker. Ready for concurring.

Oh and mark my word's next year after they Finnish with Syria. No doubt Iran will start using Weapons Of Mass destruction. Now where have I heard that before?

Look at who your helping bring freedom and democracy to, WAKE UP, this is nothing but an attempt to save the petro dollar.
http://youtu.be/TaLsIBHEvXI

and before anybody says anything i have first hand experience from my family in Turkey, who contrary to western media, most people in Turkey do not support the Rebels, nor Assad, just the people of Syria.

[fritzthecat]

I say it is likely. The strategy seems to be an attempt to bait Iran into joining the conflict in order to justify full scale invasion of Iran.

Full scale invasion of Iran? Yeah, and next full scale invasion of China and American walks on the sun.

[flagel8]

I say it is likely. The strategy seems to be an attempt to bait Iran into joining the conflict in order to justify full scale invasion of Iran.

Don't think the president wants to be impeached. Doubtful that we'll see American boots on the ground. Wouldn't surprise me to see some Drones going in though. What a mess this is turning out to be.

[Rampion]

@BunworthBanshee: only uninformed retards believe the chemical weapons attack was launched by Assad. You know, even the ONU said there was no proof that he did it...

I say it is likely. The strategy seems to be an attempt to bait Iran into joining the conflict in order to justify full scale invasion of Iran.

Don't think the president wants to be impeached. Doubtful that we'll see American boots on the ground. Wouldn't surprise me to see some Drones going in though. What a mess this is turning out to be.

Iran might be the final goal, but its just too early. I'd bet that before trying to go against Iran the USA needs first to control also Syria, Lebanon, Somalia and Sudan.

[Gabi]

By page 2 assad will become the saviour of mankind 

[PrintMule]

@BunworthBanshee: only uninformed retards believe the chemical weapons attack was launched by Assad. You know, even the ONU said there was no proof that he did it...

For him to use those weapons would be so fucking illogical, yet some will believe that. Or pretend to believe that, does not matter really.


I see it like that: mercenaries rebels are losing too much money their ground so their masters resort to staging a chemical attack, maybe even pay some loyalist soldiers to do that. And the shitstorm begins.

[xkeyscore89]

Now that US concludes that Assad regime used chemical weapons, what do you think would be course of action by US.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-08-28/obama-concludes-assad-carried-out-chemical-attack

Cruise missile strike(s).

[b!z]

Iraq war version 2.0 will happen

[Nigeria Prince]

Obama should attack Syria and kill most of them.

Here in Nigeria, nobody likes Syrian people.
Obama has Nigeria's support.

[zeta1]

Obama should attack Syria and kill most of them.

Here in Nigeria, nobody likes Syrian people.
Obama has Nigeria's support.

Troll..

[KonstantinosM]

Now that US concludes that Assad regime used chemical weapons, what do you think would be course of action by US.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-08-28/obama-concludes-assad-carried-out-chemical-attack

The Russians save the day by adding more Risperidone to the US' water supply?

I was given risperidone for Bipolar depression. There is something seriously wrong about psychiatrists in the US.


I bet the US will fuck Syria up like it has done with so many countries before. Do they have oil? Who knows? Is the US government corrupt? Hell yes.


If there is the slightest corporate interest to destabilize the current system in Syria you can be almost certain that the US government and military will be steered in this course of action.
It's only a matter of time until corporate interests become clear.


What if it was a corporation that did the chemical strikes?    US intelligence says they are not certain the regime used the weapons and I really doubt that the rebels did it.

As much as I hate conspiracy theories based on no evidence this needs to be investigated further. The US government needs to be much more open to review about the events that happened in Syria. We also need more well organized journalists that we can trust on the ground.

[Nigeria Prince]

CIA probably did the Chemical attack to give der Führer Obama reason to start war with Syria.

[b!z]

CIA probably did the Chemical attack to give der Führer Obama reason to start war with Syria.

I think the CIA is working for the president (at least in the US)

[chmod755]

With just a few battleships and people inside U.S. intelligence leaking their positions it might not be wise to strike.

The question is: Can America afford attacking Syria with more than that?

[RapidCoinz]

Plausible? It's almost definite a military strike of some sort will take place.... the fact that Obama has come out and mentioned that he ought to go back and ask congress to get their opinion means nothing.  They will strike without going to congress.  A big F@CK U to the very essence of democracy in itself. 

What happened to governments being elected on democratic values?  The opinions of the american people dont even come into the picture.  How sad. 
The politicans whom the american people 'trust' are sadly untrustworthy. 

Iraq, we were fed the same b.s
Libya, much of the same.
Syria... here we go again... same olde b.s being fabricated and green lights being given regardless of what the majority of people think. 

Democrafuckingwhat?

[PrintMule]

With just a few battleships and people inside U.S. intelligence leaking their positions it might not be wise to strike.

The question is: Can America afford attacking Syria with more than that?

Drones are relatively inexpensive.
They already blew a lot of money feeding rebels and their spies.
You don't just walk away.