Merit - right to consensus

[HALLASTERA]

Comrades, can you give me link where is was general vote about adding Merit function? If it didn't happen why you added it?
- Consensus? - says folk
- Never heard of him - says admin

Sorry for post without reason!

[1714941169]

1714941169

[1714941169]

1714941169

[1714941169]

1714941169

[Jet Cash]

On the contrary, the merit system is a way to introduce consensus about post quality, and the future direction of the forum.

[Foxpup]

Comrades, can you give me link where is was general vote about adding Merit function? If it didn't happen why you added it?

This isn't a commune. This forum is private property and the owners can add whatever they want to it.

[Lauda]

Another one-line shitposter complaining about the new system. How about doing something original for a change?

[HALLASTERA]

Another one-line shitposter complaining about the new system. How about doing something original for a change?

As you can see that tendence of answers only with legendary status or sr.member "22k posts only with constructive things" . I registered 6 months ago and currently have 143 posts . You are 4.5 years ago and currently 22 000 posts. Just use logic...

[Lauda]

As you can see that tendence of answers only with legendary status or sr.member "22k posts only with constructive things" . I registered 6 months ago and currently have 143 posts . You are 4.5 years ago and currently 22 000 posts. Just use logic...

The time of registration does not have anything to do with the quality of someone's posts. I can find you users who have registered later than you, or similarly as you and their post quality can't be compared to your shitposting.

[HALLASTERA]

On the contrary, the merit system is a way to introduce consensus about post quality, and the future direction of the forum.

Alright system is good. But why merit was calculated with that activitiy. Why not all of us with zero points: legendary, sr.members and others? Guy with 22k posts must have same points like new members and ofcourse with status Legendary.

[Jet Cash]

Alright system is good. But why merit was calculated with that activitiy. Why not all of us with zero points: legendary, sr.members and others? Guy with 22k posts must have same points like new members and ofcourse with status Legendary.

Because that would drop everybody to junior status.

I agree that a category for legendaries who have been awarded merits would would be a useful extra rank. Hence my invention of the LAMP rank.

[athanz88]

On the contrary, the merit system is a way to introduce consensus about post quality, and the future direction of the forum.

Alright system is good. But why merit was calculated with that activitiy. Why not all of us with zero points: legendary, sr.members and others? Guy with 22k posts must have same points like new members and ofcourse with status Legendary.

For your information, this forum is owned by a person because he made the idea and made it real with some hosting job, coding job, etc. That person also pays for the fees of moderators and other things to make this forums goes well. You, me, and others are all only people who gathers here to talk about cryptocurrency, and some to try to get money from it. You don't even pay a single bit USD to the owner yet you claim this is an open forum and before something implemented in this forum they need to consider what the users want. Hello, wake up please !
As for your question no 2, why all people not given the same merit, zero. I believe it is also for the sake of new member too. Imagine if all people starts with 0, I bet all high rank member who is friend to each other will give merit to each other because with their experience, most likely only them will make a good and high quality posts and then all the lower rank will be ignored, resulting to much more time to rank up.

[HALLASTERA]

On the contrary, the merit system is a way to introduce consensus about post quality, and the future direction of the forum.

Alright system is good. But why merit was calculated with that activitiy. Why not all of us with zero points: legendary, sr.members and others? Guy with 22k posts must have same points like new members and ofcourse with status Legendary.

For your information, this forum is owned by a person because he made the idea and made it real with some hosting job, coding job, etc. That person also pays for the fees of moderators and other things to make this forums goes well. You, me, and others are all only people who gathers here to talk about cryptocurrency, and some to try to get money from it. You don't even pay a single bit USD to the owner yet you claim this is an open forum and before something implemented in this forum they need to consider what the users want. Hello, wake up please !
As for your question no 2, why all people not given the same merit, zero. I believe it is also for the sake of new member too. Imagine if all people starts with 0, I bet all high rank member who is friend to each other will give merit to each other because with their experience, most likely only them will make a good and high quality posts and then all the lower rank will be ignored, resulting to much more time to rank up.

Merit system is totally worst because you must look to  "Bitcoin discussion thread, altcoin discussion thread and etc" and check every topic where there are no people who earn merits! It's be positive only for technical discussion.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Another one-line shitposter complaining about the new system. How about doing something original for a change?

As you can see that tendence of answers only with legendary status or sr.member "22k posts only with constructive things" . I registered 6 months ago and currently have 143 posts . You are 4.5 years ago and currently 22 000 posts. Just use logic...

You only understand shitposter logic, so unless it's an argument that validates your excuses and laziness, you wouldn't understand it.  Certainly nothing Lauda says is going to make sense to you.  How you ended up with even a single merit point thus far is beyond me.   Tell me true, you purchased that merit, didn't you?

[ahkiatt]

I actually foresee a lot more selling of old accounts and possibly people buying merit.

[HALLASTERA]

Another one-line shitposter complaining about the new system. How about doing something original for a change?

As you can see that tendence of answers only with legendary status or sr.member "22k posts only with constructive things" . I registered 6 months ago and currently have 143 posts . You are 4.5 years ago and currently 22 000 posts. Just use logic...

You only understand shitposter logic, so unless it's an argument that validates your excuses and laziness, you wouldn't understand it.  Certainly nothing Lauda says is going to make sense to you.  How you ended up with even a single merit point thus far is beyond me.   Tell me true, you purchased that merit, didn't you?

I don't buy anything what you tell me about? Most people who is donors of merit give only for legendary or old school members. If you blind just look here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2861000.0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2772608.0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2826330.0 and etc . Where you see that somebody got Merits for answers to newbies?
But in technical discussion https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2850720.msg29246608#msg29246608 every legendary. Merits from legends to another legends - it's OK 

[Jet Cash]

Tech discussion requires a good knowledge of bitcoin to contribute in many of the threads. It is more likely that senior members will have this level of knowledge.

[TheQuin]

Another one-line shitposter complaining about the new system. How about doing something original for a change?

As you can see that tendence of answers only with legendary status or sr.member "22k posts only with constructive things" . I registered 6 months ago and currently have 143 posts . You are 4.5 years ago and currently 22 000 posts. Just use logic...

You only understand shitposter logic, so unless it's an argument that validates your excuses and laziness, you wouldn't understand it.  Certainly nothing Lauda says is going to make sense to you.  How you ended up with even a single merit point thus far is beyond me.   Tell me true, you purchased that merit, didn't you?

I don't think he purchased it. Looks to be a gift from his alt account kinki32. They both have the same ETH address on their profile http://archive.is/JGDfu http://archive.is/amCFx

[Lauda]

Another one-line shitposter complaining about the new system. How about doing something original for a change?

As you can see that tendence of answers only with legendary status or sr.member "22k posts only with constructive things" . I registered 6 months ago and currently have 143 posts . You are 4.5 years ago and currently 22 000 posts. Just use logic...

You only understand shitposter logic, so unless it's an argument that validates your excuses and laziness, you wouldn't understand it.  Certainly nothing Lauda says is going to make sense to you.  How you ended up with even a single merit point thus far is beyond me.   Tell me true, you purchased that merit, didn't you?

I don't think he purchased it. Looks to be a gift from his alt account kinki32. They both have the same ETH address on their profile http://archive.is/JGDfu http://archive.is/amCFx

Nice work. Tagged both.

[HALLASTERA]

Another one-line shitposter complaining about the new system. How about doing something original for a change?

As you can see that tendence of answers only with legendary status or sr.member "22k posts only with constructive things" . I registered 6 months ago and currently have 143 posts . You are 4.5 years ago and currently 22 000 posts. Just use logic...

You only understand shitposter logic, so unless it's an argument that validates your excuses and laziness, you wouldn't understand it.  Certainly nothing Lauda says is going to make sense to you.  How you ended up with even a single merit point thus far is beyond me.   Tell me true, you purchased that merit, didn't you?

I don't think he purchased it. Looks to be a gift from his alt account kinki32. They both have the same ETH address on their profile http://archive.is/JGDfu http://archive.is/amCFx

Nice work. Tagged both.

It's must don't care anyone. I did not violate the rules of the forum. But your review from system of trust is worst. I'm told you about you're shit poster who have 22k without reason posts. If I wanted to hide my second account I'd not use same eth adress. But it's not problem for rules. I see your only negative trust and bad reviews from respects users, reviews about promotion from your scam project.

[Lauda]

It's must don't care anyone. I did not violate the rules of the forum. But your review from system of trust is worst. I'm told you about you're shit poster who have 22k without reason posts. If I wanted to hide my second account I'd not use same eth adress. But it's not problem for rules. I see your only negative trust and bad reviews from respects users, reviews about promotion from your scam project.

There's so much wrong in that post; being intelligent is hard work indeed. All I have left for this post is the following:

[actmyname]

It's must don't care anyone. I did not violate the rules of the forum.

This is the same overused argument. Just because there are no forum rules dictating whether you can/can't do something does not mean that people are disallowed from sending trust feedback for it.

I'm told you about you're shit poster who have 22k without reason posts.

What do ad hominem attacks have to do with anything? Regardless of the truthfulness of the arguments, they aren't really sound if you're trying to justify something.

If I wanted to hide my second account I'd not use same eth adress.

Wrong. Nice try though. It just means you were an idiot.

But it's not problem for rules. I see your only negative trust and bad reviews from respects users, reviews about promotion from your scam project.

Negative trust can be fake.

[HALLASTERA]

It's must don't care anyone. I did not violate the rules of the forum.

This is the same overused argument. Just because there are no forum rules dictating whether you can/can't do something does not mean that people are disallowed from sending trust feedback for it.

I'm told you about you're shit poster who have 22k without reason posts.

What do ad hominem attacks have to do with anything? Regardless of the truthfulness of the arguments, they aren't really sound if you're trying to justify something.

If I wanted to hide my second account I'd not use same eth adress.

Wrong. Nice try though. It just means you were an idiot.

But it's not problem for rules. I see your only negative trust and bad reviews from respects users, reviews about promotion from your scam project.

Negative trust can be fake.

Not sure what I talk to another guy. Maybe you and Lauda it's one persone? Merits and trusts farming hmm...