ijphlrnxewho
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 02, 2013, 12:08:10 AM |
|
This was cool
Fees 0.001 BTC
I really like the part where fee is 0.001 BTC on a $1 M transaction.
|
|
|
|
BitAddict
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 02, 2013, 01:15:56 AM |
|
This was cool
Fees 0.001 BTC
I really like the part where fee is 0.001 BTC on a $1 M transaction. I prefer the part where he can send all that money without any question
|
|
|
|
mechs
|
|
September 02, 2013, 01:21:33 AM |
|
This was cool
Fees 0.001 BTC
I really like the part where fee is 0.001 BTC on a $1 M transaction. I prefer the part where he can send all that money without any question The questions come when the receiver attempts to convert it to Fiat.
|
|
|
|
faiza1990
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
★☆★777Coin★☆★
|
|
September 02, 2013, 04:31:05 AM |
|
best thing is not verification and no documents needed for this all
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin Co-op
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1268
Merit: 1006
|
|
September 02, 2013, 09:18:15 AM |
|
This was cool
Fees 0.001 BTC
I really like the part where fee is 0.001 BTC on a $1 M transaction. I prefer the part where he can send all that money without any question The questions come when the receiver attempts to convert it to Fiat. Why would he do that
|
We work hard to promote Bitcoin adoption and the decentralization of society. You can support our efforts by donating BTC to 35wDNxFhDB6Ss8fgijUUpn2Yx6sggDgGqS
|
|
|
FeedbackLoop
|
|
September 02, 2013, 10:09:52 AM |
|
This was cool
Fees 0.001 BTC
I really like the part where fee is 0.001 BTC on a $1 M transaction. I prefer the part where he can send all that money without any question The questions come when the receiver attempts to convert it to Fiat. Why would he do that Beat me to it. But maybe he wants to convert to Fiat out of generosity to banks! Tax payers all over the World has been up in broad generosity towards banks, so why should he be rude and not pay banking fees or not let a bank and a government decide where he can transfer his money? Btw the transfer was "only" 7000 Bitcoins.
|
|
|
|
Abdussamad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3682
Merit: 1580
|
|
September 02, 2013, 11:46:02 AM |
|
Actually for a transfer this size he needn't have given any fee at all! It would have been mined in the next block with 0 fee.
|
|
|
|
BitAddict
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 02, 2013, 12:16:32 PM |
|
Actually for a transfer this size he needn't have given any fee at all! It would have been mined in the next block with 0 fee.
That's true, but I think he can afford to give, at least, a small tip to the miners
|
|
|
|
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014
In Satoshi I Trust
|
|
September 02, 2013, 12:43:30 PM |
|
This was cool
Fees 0.001 BTC
I really like the part where fee is 0.001 BTC on a $1 M transaction. I prefer the part where he can send all that money without any question The questions come when the receiver attempts to convert it to Fiat. maybe there will be a solution for it in the future. to go to local-bitcoins.com would not a good way for that volumen i guess
|
|
|
|
elor70
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
September 02, 2013, 06:25:28 PM |
|
wow im jely...
|
|
|
|
Carlton Banks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
|
|
September 02, 2013, 08:15:38 PM |
|
The longer that time goes on, the more I love how I'm getting used to sensible numbers of BTC equating to "loads of money". And what outright BTC figures really mean. 0.5 BTC is almost a fortune now. Even people holding half a coin are wealthy, the notion of reliable values of fiat equivalency are steadily loosing solidity.
|
Vires in numeris
|
|
|
marcotheminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
|
September 20, 2013, 04:26:35 AM |
|
Woah! Thats pretty damn big! And only a fee of 0.001 BTC aswell! I wish he mispelt the address to mine! haha
|
|
|
|
reznor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
September 20, 2013, 01:53:40 PM |
|
Damn! Look like Satoshi's btc on the big run. pm me just in case you want to donate 1btc on your early bird earnings haha!
|
|
|
|
nobbynobbynoob
|
|
September 20, 2013, 02:25:29 PM |
|
There's a high statistical chance it's an exchange handling this amount. Not a certainty, of course, but highly likely.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinEXpress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1210
Merit: 1024
|
|
September 21, 2013, 05:44:37 PM |
|
How did they pay so little tx fee, also I wonder how they keep so many BTC. I would be a nervous wreck with that many.
There are very, very few individuals with that much BTC. Not true at all. ~BCX~
|
|
|
|
CurbsideProphet
|
|
September 21, 2013, 06:03:56 PM |
|
History never repeats itself but it rhymes. As far as I know a virtual currency like bitcoin has never been used. But you "could" be right of course. But no one knows for sure.
And we'd still be living in caves and hunting with stone spears if everyone had a similar outlook.
|
1ProphetnvP8ju2SxxRvVvyzCtTXDgLPJV
|
|
|
nobbynobbynoob
|
|
September 21, 2013, 08:07:27 PM |
|
There are very, very few individuals with that much BTC. Not true at all. ~BCX~ It is true in the grander context, it's just that most of those people are found on Bitcointalk. There aren't all that many funded addresses containing more than BTC1000 to begin with, and a good portion of those are probably controlled by exchanges and large gambling sites.
|
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
September 22, 2013, 02:44:43 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
marcotheminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
|
September 22, 2013, 03:03:41 AM |
|
Or we could have just found the transaction of the biggest BTC heist in history. Maybe! We probably will never know! ahah
|
|
|
|
Inedible
|
|
September 22, 2013, 03:18:34 AM |
|
This was cool
Fees 0.001 BTC
I really like the part where fee is 0.001 BTC on a $1 M transaction. I prefer the part where he can send all that money without any question That's both a good and a bad thing.
|
If this post was useful, interesting or entertaining, then you've misunderstood.
|
|
|
|