Sports betting sometimes calls moneyline bets 1x2, where 1 refers to the first team winning (Rotterdam in this case), x refers to a tie, and 2 refers to the second team winning (Dan Helder in this case). So, yes, the fixed match did not go according to plan, as Dan Helder should have won. Perhaps odd_077 was wanting to place a lot of money of Rotterdam to win, and was hoping many people playing large bets on Den Helder would cause the odds for Rotterdam to go up (especially if he's betting on a small sportsbook)
I appreciate the info, since it doesn't look like OP was ever going to return to the thread. It would've been pretty honorable, admirable even if they came back to apologize for misleading us. When they don't even return to the thread it makes it appear as though it was intentional, as you've eluded to. This is why I'm reluctant to ever hop on board any "fixed" bets, trading signals or anything of the like; to many false prophets. I'm not sure how this merit system works yet fully, last time I checked I had no merit to give, but if I gain some in the future I'll send some your way. This will come in handy when trying to decipher the code of OP when they refuse to respond.
Follow-up question (assuming you're still watching the thread) : Is there a single reputable source for the kind of thing OP was pretending to offer?