Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 09:31:39 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin network hashrate is 35 times higher than top 500 supercomputers  (Read 3962 times)
ask (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1004



View Profile
September 04, 2013, 07:24:46 AM
Last edit: September 04, 2013, 08:49:06 AM by ask
 #1

Bitcoin network hashrate
7926.83 PetaFLOPS
(http://bitcoincharts.com/bitcoin/)

Top 500 supercomputers
223.54 PetaFLOPS
(http://www.top500.org/statistics/perfdevel/)

1715419899
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715419899

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715419899
Reply with quote  #2

1715419899
Report to moderator
1715419899
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715419899

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715419899
Reply with quote  #2

1715419899
Report to moderator
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715419899
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715419899

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715419899
Reply with quote  #2

1715419899
Report to moderator
vulgartrendkill
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
September 04, 2013, 07:26:38 AM
 #2

Bitcoin network hashrate
7926.83 PetaFLOPS
(http://bitcoincharts.com/bitcoin/)


Top 500 supercomputers
33.86 PetaFLOPS
(http://www.top500.org/statistics/perfdevel/)



according to that site its 671.025 Thash/s? or am I looking in the wrong place?
Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3074



View Profile
September 04, 2013, 07:09:44 PM
 #3

Always beware that these figures are FLOP equivalent, and not actual FLOP measurement. SHA-2 uses integer mathematics, there are no floating point operations, and hence, no FLOPS measurable directly.

Vires in numeris
mgio
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 04, 2013, 08:07:15 PM
 #4

Completely meaningless statistic.

Bitcoin ASIC miners can't even compute a floating point operation so they are not at all comparable to a supercomputer that can be used for many things.

Comparing specialized bitcoin hardware to supercomputers simply can't be done. The bitcoin network is faster at performing SHA256 hashes, but thats it.
xxjs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 04, 2013, 08:44:20 PM
 #5

Completely meaningless statistic.

Bitcoin ASIC miners can't even compute a floating point operation so they are not at all comparable to a supercomputer that can be used for many things.

Comparing specialized bitcoin hardware to supercomputers simply can't be done. The bitcoin network is faster at performing SHA256 hashes, but thats it.

Assuming the supercomputers also are quite capable of integer arithmetic, it would be interesting to have an estimate of the mining hashpower such machines have.
notme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002


View Profile
September 04, 2013, 08:49:05 PM
 #6

Completely meaningless statistic.

Bitcoin ASIC miners can't even compute a floating point operation so they are not at all comparable to a supercomputer that can be used for many things.

Comparing specialized bitcoin hardware to supercomputers simply can't be done. The bitcoin network is faster at performing SHA256 hashes, but thats it.

Assuming the supercomputers also are quite capable of integer arithmetic, it would be interesting to have an estimate of the mining hashpower such machines have.

Usually they aren't very good at integer math.  Most calculations use floating point.  Unfortunately, most of the important constants in science are not integers (pi, e, phi, etc) and rarely are the things you want to measure integer length.

https://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
While no idea is perfect, some ideas are useful.
imrer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 04, 2013, 11:29:35 PM
 #7

Apples vs pears

Start your own casino site: » CoinDice | CoinWheel «
rix5
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 05, 2013, 10:54:24 AM
 #8

does this not at least say it's not possible anymore to get the 51% for the malicious banks and governments? Or am i missing sth here?
PrintMule
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 500


FREE $50 BONUS - STAKE - [click signature]


View Profile
September 05, 2013, 10:56:38 AM
 #9

Also why top 500 and not every single supercomputer combined?


██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████▀▀▀        ▀▀█████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████▀    ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ███████████████████████████████████████████████
█████    ▄█████████▌   ▐█████▀  ▐███████████████▌  ▀██████████████████
████▌   ▐██████████    █████    ████████████████    ██████████████████
████▌   ▐█████████▄▄▄▄█████▌   ▐███████████████▌   ▐███▀▀█████████████
█████    ▀███████████████▀▀        ▄███████████    ██▀   ▐████████████
██████▄     ▀▀███████▀▀         ▄▄███▀▀▀▀█████▌   ▐▀   ▄███▀▀   ▀█████
█████████▄▄     ▀▀███▄  ▄▄    ████▀    ▄   ███       ▄███▀   ▄█  ▐████
█████████████▄▄     ▀████▌   ▐███▀   ███   ██▌      ████    ██▀  █████
██████▀▀   ▀█████▄    ███    ████   ███▌  ▐██    ▌  ▐██▌      ▄▄██████
█████    ▄████████    ▐██    ██▀▀   ██▀   ▐▀    ▐█   ██▌   ▀██▀▀  ████
████▌   ▐████████▀    ███▄     ▄▄▄     ▄    ▄   ▐██   ██▄      ▄▄█████
████▌   ███████▀    ▄███████████████████████████████▄  ▀▀██████▀▀ ████
█████    ▀▀▀▀     ▄█████████▀    ▀█▀    ▀█       ▀████▄▄         ▄████
██████▄▄    ▄▄▄▄████████████  █████  ██  █  █  █  ████████████████████
█████████████████████████  █▄    ▄█▄    ▄█  █  █  ████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀▐▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀█▄
▄█▀    ▄▀█████▀     ▀█▄
▄█▄    █        ▀▄   ███▄
▄████▀▀▀▀▄       ▄▀▀▀▀▀███▄
████      ▀▄▄▄▄▄▀       ███
███     ▄▄███████▄▄     ▄▀█
█  ▀▄ ▄▀ ▀███████▀ ▀▄ ▄▀  █
▀█   █     ▀███▀     ▀▄  █▀
▀█▄▄█▄      █        █▄█▀
▀█████▄ ▄▀▀ ▀▀▄▄ ▄▄███▀
▀█████        ████▀
▀▀█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀▀
● OVER 1000 GAMES
● DAILY RACES AND BONUSES
● 24/7 LIVE SUPPORT
Pokerfan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 05, 2013, 11:01:01 AM
 #10

This is of course a bad comparison because bitcoin hashing hardware is specialized and supercomputers are not.

If governments wanted to attack bitcoin, they would develop custom ASICs.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!