🔥🔥🔥Blazepool on FIRE🔥180+ coins🔥well established🔥multi-algo switching pool

[JukNi]

@Blazepool

Can you check what is wrong/messed in my side or your pool, Im guessing that problem is in my rig (xtra small rig 2 x 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme 11 GB). NemosMiner-v2.4.2-2.4.1.b has now worked 24/7 for 7 days and total earn is only 0.00150968BTC. No errors in log files or anything like that. I do get reject shares alot no matter what algo, rejects are ~1.0% up tp 12%. I have tried to use "-m 2" and other fix what I have found in internet, but no luck, no matter if I connect straight from Finland or do I connect VPN to West Coast.
Cards are not OC´d, default 24/7. When I use Zpool with same settings and cards I get much faster earnings.

All solutions are welcome.

My Wallet is: 1Fo61jU7ewGfqvSPnXLKW8cbqa5nidq3rS

[Blazepool]

@JukNi. Thank you very much for trying out Blazepool.  The return that you got on your account is definitely NOT typical of a 2x1080Ti rig.  For example, with a single 1080Ti at stock at 65% TDP, one should get around 0.0005 to 0.0006 in the past 24hrs with some typical selection of algos. Maybe you can post your bat file for troubleshooting here or seek faster response from our Discord.

[JukNi]

@JukNi. Thank you very much for trying out Blazepool.  The return that you got on your account is definitely NOT typical of a 2x1080Ti rig.  For example, with a single 1080Ti at stock at 65% TDP, one should get around 0.0005 to 0.0006 in the past 24hrs with some typical selection of algos. Maybe you can post your bat file for troubleshooting here or seek faster response from our Discord.

Im using that ´startblazepool - Multi-GPU Example.bat´ file to start, only deleted yescrypt, lbry and scrypt algos out of there and change my BTC address. Im running 100% TDP because im not the one who pays electricity  

Im totally new in this "business" so every guidance are welcome.

[Blazepool]

@JukNi. Curious, what are the temps of the GPUs?

[JukNi]

@JukNi. Curious, what are the temps of the GPUs?

It hovers 65-72C. Now im going 150% TDP and look what difference it makes if at all. Those are not in SLI config, both works at own.
Dont know how much it matters but im mining from Finland and it may get big latency or something because of that reject %

Pinging blazepool.com [198.199.107.89] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 198.199.107.89: bytes=32 time=201ms TTL=53
Reply from 198.199.107.89: bytes=32 time=199ms TTL=53
Reply from 198.199.107.89: bytes=32 time=197ms TTL=53
Reply from 198.199.107.89: bytes=32 time=195ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 198.199.107.89:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 195ms, Maximum = 201ms, Average = 198ms

[Blazepool]

@JukNi you have really cold ambient temp for your rig and open frame?  Reason I'm asking is those temps looks low if you're not running really high fans for 1080Ti @100% TDP.  And from the low returns you got, there's a chance of constant thermal throttling.

[Max3k]

For example, with a single 1080Ti at stock at 65% TDP, one should get around 0.0005 to 0.0006 in the past 24hrs with some typical selection of algos.

What kind of algorithms and settings bring that income?

[JukNi]

@JukNi you have really cold ambient temp for your rig and open frame?  Reason I'm asking is those temps looks low if you're not running really high fans for 1080Ti @100% TDP.  And from the low returns you got, there's a chance of constant thermal throttling.

That rig is in "cold room" where temp is ~14-17C (can be lowered to -12C), and fans are auto mode and it keeps 42-46% @ 100% TDP and fans 59-64% @ 150% TDP.
According to nVidia Inspector cards are not thermo throttling, voltages (0.963-0.975) and CPU usage (99%) stay really steady.

[Blazepool]

@Max3k  The test rig was a very simple one:  Old Dell computer with Core2Duo6300, 4G of Generic Ram, 1x EVGA 1080Ti FTW3 at stock clock 65%TDP.  Activated Algos were:  neoscrypt, xevan, blake2s, phi, x17, sib, lyra2v2, nist5, skein.  Of course anytime with data like these, luck plays a factor and 24 hour test is way to short to tell true stories of long running averages.


@JukNi The "cold room" explains the low temp.  What's your average x17 hashrate?  Should be in the 40-50MH/s for the 2x 1080ti, are you seeing these values?

[romajc]

My miner isn't seeing Timetravel on Blazepool.

This is one of most profitable last couple days on other pools.  Plan on adding any new algos or coins?

[JukNi]

@JukNi The "cold room" explains the low temp.  What's your average x17 hashrate?  Should be in the 40-50MH/s for the 2x 1080ti, are you seeing these values?

X17 gives without any tweaking 34,9 MH/s @ 100% TDP. The "problem" algo is HMQ1725
I did test card by card and both with HMQ1725 algo 100 % TDP, base clock and memery.

GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 8938.35 kH/s (ccminer-x64-80 -a hmq1725 -d 0 -o stratum+tcp://hmq1725.mine.blazepool.com:3747 -u 1Fo61jU7ewGfqvSPnXLKW8cbqa5nidq3rS -p c=BTC -i 20)

GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 8912.96kH/s (ccminer-x64-80 -a hmq1725 -d 1 -o stratum+tcp://hmq1725.mine.blazepool.com:3747 -u 1Fo61jU7ewGfqvSPnXLKW8cbqa5nidq3rS -p c=BTC -i 20)

GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 8170.17 kH/s
GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 8122.62 kH/s
accepted: 98/98 (diff 0.001), 16.29 MH/s yes!
(ccminer-x64-80 -a hmq1725 -o stratum+tcp://hmq1725.mine.blazepool.com:3747 -u 1Fo61jU7ewGfqvSPnXLKW8cbqa5nidq3rS -p c=BTC -i 20)

More intensity will give: "GPU #: unspecified launch failure"

And this is fastest ccminer what I have in my collection. I have tested lots of differend version and "brands" (tpruvot, alexis, nanashi etc...)

*** ccminer skunk-krnlx for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 8.0 64-bits

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)


   

[Chosscoin]

Hello:

I have updated Sniffdog (your Blazepool version) and now you can only mine 7 algotithms with this software. Xevan and Tribus have disappeared.

Is there a problem with them?

[JukNi]

Hello:

I have updated Sniffdog (your Blazepool version) and now you can only mine 7 algotithms with this software. Xevan and Tribus have disappeared.

Is there a problem with them?

Hello

There is no problem with few algos missing, Im just wondering why my 2x1080ti rig is so terribly slow with hmq1725 algo. 

[Chosscoin]

Hello:

I have updated Sniffdog (your Blazepool version) and now you can only mine 7 algotithms with this software. Xevan and Tribus have disappeared.

Is there a problem with them?

Hello

There is no problem with few algos missing, Im just wondering why my 2x1080ti rig is so terribly slow with hmq1725 algo. 

So if there is no problem, why has Blazepool removed them in the Sniffdog update?

Thank you

[JukNi]

Hello:

I have updated Sniffdog (your Blazepool version) and now you can only mine 7 algotithms with this software. Xevan and Tribus have disappeared.

Is there a problem with them?

Hello

There is no problem with few algos missing, Im just wondering why my 2x1080ti rig is so terribly slow with hmq1725 algo. 

So if there is no problem, why has Blazepool removed them in the Sniffdog update?

Thank you

All you have to do to get algos back is update your .bat file look like this

Code:

powershell -version 5.0 -noexit -executionpolicy bypass -windowstyle maximized -command "&.\NemosMiner-v2.4.2.ps1 -SelGPUDSTM '0 1' -SelGPUCC '0,1' -Currency EUR -Passwordcurrency BTC -interval 300 -Wallet YOUR BTC WALLET HERE -Location US -ActiveMinerGainPct 3 -PoolName blazepool -WorkerName ID=WRKR NAME HERE -Type nvidia -Algorithm xevan,hsr,phi,tribus,c11,skein,groestl,sib,bitcore,x17,Nist5,Lyra2RE2,blake2s,yescrypt,blakecoin,keccak,hmq1725,scrypt,skunk,timetravel,x11,myrgr,lbry -Donate 0

This works for me 100%, vant see why not for you too. Change BTC address etc to match yours (I dont mind if you mine for my btc address  )
If you have AMD then change that -Type nvidia to -Type amd, and currency what you want to use.

[Chosscoin]

Yes, I know, but my question is, why are they removed? Are they unstable? Are they not profitable?

Then I could add them without problems?

Thank you very much

[JukNi]

Yes, I know, but my question is, why are they removed? Are they unstable? Are they not profitable?

Then I could add them without problems?

Thank you very much

I have no idea why those are removed. I have keep using those removed algos and cant see any problems. Mining works well and payment comes after a while.
If you ask me, just keep mining with those pretty profitable algos. I havent see any infos that blazepool is shutting down some algos or anything like that.

Keep it going as long as it last... 

[Chosscoin]

Yes, I know, but my question is, why are they removed? Are they unstable? Are they not profitable?

Then I could add them without problems?

Thank you very much

I have no idea why those are removed. I have keep using those removed algos and cant see any problems. Mining works well and payment comes after a while.
If you ask me, just keep mining with those pretty profitable algos. I havent see any infos that blazepool is shutting down some algos or anything like that.

Keep it going as long as it last... 

Thank you very much for taking the time to answer me.

Regarding what happens to you with the HMQ algorithm, I have tried it and I get many rejected shares, for low difficulty, I have eliminated it.

[JukNi]

Yes, I know, but my question is, why are they removed? Are they unstable? Are they not profitable?

Then I could add them without problems?

Thank you very much

I have no idea why those are removed. I have keep using those removed algos and cant see any problems. Mining works well and payment comes after a while.
If you ask me, just keep mining with those pretty profitable algos. I havent see any infos that blazepool is shutting down some algos or anything like that.

Keep it going as long as it last... 

Thank you very much for taking the time to answer me.

Regarding what happens to you with the HMQ algorithm, I have tried it and I get many rejected shares, for low difficulty, I have eliminated it.

You can get much more less reject shares if you add command -m 2 ( -m, --diff-multiplier Multiply difficulty by this value (default 1.0))
Dont ask if it makes difference in payments or something, that you should ask those who knows this business, Im totally new and google learnd how this happends 

[Bit2017User]

Hello Guys
Can you help me configure the command line for Claymore 11 in order
To mine Ethereum ( MPH ) + Blake2s ( blazepool )
Is there a way to make it work ?

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool europe.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20535 -ewal 999.clay -epsw clay -dpool stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.blazepool.com:5766 -dwal ****mXHJK3WDL15vFbD73VECT84N*** -dpsw x -dcoin blake2s -eworker LAD3ATI560,c=BTC -allpools 1

The problem is that i need to specify a currency for example: ID=Rig01,c=BTC

Thanks