Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 01:41:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Fan Speed vs Heat  (Read 3203 times)
Morebitcoinsplease
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10



View Profile
July 19, 2011, 08:18:19 PM
 #21

The fact is, that running your computer 24/7 actually makes it last longer than turning it off and on.

The reason being is that heating and cooling of materials degrades them over time (just like bridges, roads, etc up here in Canada) ... if your rig simply stays at 80 degrees celcius forever it will hardly even know it was turned on.

The high speed of the fan could eventually wear down the ball bearings and stop spinning. Therefore it may be beneficial to run your fan at a lower speed and simply accept the higher temps.

Sorry but the video comment is misleading. While it's quite true that maintaining the chips at some constant temperature is likely to make it last longer than daily on/off cycles (due to expension/contraction cycles as well as inrush stress), the qualifier here is thermal damage at the temperature does not exceed the damage of the on/off cycles. Rule of thumb is every 10C halves the life of a component so at some point, the GPU despite being at a constant temperature, will die really fast. So it's always about finding a good balance point and if necessary, sacrifice some of the cheaper component's life in favour of the more expensive item.

Of course, if they do keep up improvements to the GPU, then all this simply may not matter. You just to keep it alive long enough to be profitable to replace it with a better unit Cheesy

I would love to see proof of said "rule of thumb" actually being true in real life.

IMO, heat is way overblown.  GPU's are safe up to 90c EASILY, and I've only ever heard of a GPU dying from heat over 110c.  Keep it below that, and in all likelyhood your card will be absolutely fine.

I have seen & tested with my GPUs when they even reach near 100C the PC auto shutdowns because it knows it over heating.

The range my cards go is 65C to 82C I don't even like the cards going into the 80's but thats how hard they are working. I think it depends on how long you hope to keep the cards running 24/7 for a year. At 90C or even 80C, the temperatures just don't sit well with me.

But I don't know how many hours these ATI cards were built to last. Guess that's why its important to keep that box and warranty  Cheesy
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
CanaryInTheMine
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1060


between a rock and a block!


View Profile
July 20, 2011, 12:00:47 AM
 #22

I'm wondering whether one should go for higher fan speed or higher heat in trying to get the longest life span out of a miner. I currently have two 5830s running at 67C with fans at 76% and I'm wondering if it's better to run the fan harder or let the cards go a little hotter... Any opinions?

you're not squeezing as much as you can out of this.  OC to the point where the temp is ~75C at least with same fan speed.

Before this card fails, you are likely to stop mining anyways, so get as much out of it as possible.
SgtSpike
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005



View Profile
July 20, 2011, 03:56:55 AM
 #23

The fact is, that running your computer 24/7 actually makes it last longer than turning it off and on.

The reason being is that heating and cooling of materials degrades them over time (just like bridges, roads, etc up here in Canada) ... if your rig simply stays at 80 degrees celcius forever it will hardly even know it was turned on.

The high speed of the fan could eventually wear down the ball bearings and stop spinning. Therefore it may be beneficial to run your fan at a lower speed and simply accept the higher temps.

Sorry but the video comment is misleading. While it's quite true that maintaining the chips at some constant temperature is likely to make it last longer than daily on/off cycles (due to expension/contraction cycles as well as inrush stress), the qualifier here is thermal damage at the temperature does not exceed the damage of the on/off cycles. Rule of thumb is every 10C halves the life of a component so at some point, the GPU despite being at a constant temperature, will die really fast. So it's always about finding a good balance point and if necessary, sacrifice some of the cheaper component's life in favour of the more expensive item.

Of course, if they do keep up improvements to the GPU, then all this simply may not matter. You just to keep it alive long enough to be profitable to replace it with a better unit Cheesy

I would love to see proof of said "rule of thumb" actually being true in real life.

IMO, heat is way overblown.  GPU's are safe up to 90c EASILY, and I've only ever heard of a GPU dying from heat over 110c.  Keep it below that, and in all likelyhood your card will be absolutely fine.

I have seen & tested with my GPUs when they even reach near 100C the PC auto shutdowns because it knows it over heating.

The range my cards go is 65C to 82C I don't even like the cards going into the 80's but thats how hard they are working. I think it depends on how long you hope to keep the cards running 24/7 for a year. At 90C or even 80C, the temperatures just don't sit well with me.

But I don't know how many hours these ATI cards were built to last. Guess that's why its important to keep that box and warranty  Cheesy
And at 90c it will start clocking down the core and memory clocks to preserve the card as well, which is my point entirely.  A GPU manufacturer would start it clocking down sooner if they thought it would result in more RMAs running at 90c.
Xephan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 20, 2011, 04:12:29 AM
 #24

I would love to see proof of said "rule of thumb" actually being true in real life.

I don't have stats for GPU but back when overclocking CPU was the craze, there were quite a few users who had their highly overclocked and hot CPU die after a few months. If you dig up electronics and semicon datasheets, there are manufacturer charts for expected lifespan vs temperature delta.

Quote
IMO, heat is way overblown.  GPU's are safe up to 90c EASILY, and I've only ever heard of a GPU dying from heat over 110c.  Keep it below that, and in all likelyhood your card will be absolutely fine.

Which is why I said it might not matter if you intend to replace the GPU with a faster one as soon as they are available. The manufacturers usually set the shutdown/throttle point at some temperature they expect is the max allowable that doesn't degrade the expected lifespan near their warranty timespan.

However, the risk is that if you push it to that limit, the delay between thermal protections kicking in could still kill your GPU within a few months like those dead CPUs.

So while I think it's silly to spend money on massive cooling equipment to keep temperatures as low as possible, I also don't think it's good to run the GPU right up to the throttling/shutdown point. 10C is a healthy buffer so I try to keep things to 80C max.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!