Funakoshi equihash cuda miner is now available

[funakoshi]

@Funakoshi: how does it compare to DSTM ? Because DSTM is faster than EWBF. Please advise. Thank you.

Don't ask me. I am not objective. Try and see.
I think that it depends on your comfiguration.

[funakoshi]

Version 1.0 of Funakoshi equihash cuda miner has been released.
You are welcome to give it a try.
Performance has been improved.

   https://github.com/funakoshi2718/funakoshi-miner

[SpecterHome]

Hi!
Try to use it, but i got
C:\funakoshi-miner-master>funakoshiMiner -cd 0 -l eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -u
MyWorkerName -temp-max 65 -temp-min 55

[2018-Mar-05 18:05:00] [MINER] Using pool: eu1-zcash.flypool.org
[2018-Mar-05 18:05:00] [MINER] Starting miner
[2018-Mar-05 18:05:00] [GPU-0] FUNAKOSHI-solver starts mining (device-info: GeF
rce GTX 1060 3GB, version: 6.1, device: 0)
[2018-Mar-05 18:05:00] [MINER] Connecting to stratum server eu1-zcash.flypool.o
g:3333
[2018-Mar-05 18:05:01] [MINER] wrong version number
[2018-Mar-05 18:05:01] [MINER] Reconnecting in 3 seconds...
[2018-Mar-05 18:05:01] [GPU-0] Temperature: 34, temp-max: 65, temp-min: 55
Power Draw: 27059 milliwatts
[2018-Mar-05 18:05:27] [GPU-0 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Mar-05 18:05:27] [TOTAL (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s, 0 Accepted, 0 Rejected
[2018-Mar-05 18:05:40] [GPU-0 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Mar-05 18:05:40] [TOTAL (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s, 0 Accepted, 0 Rejected
[2018-Mar-05 18:05:53] [GPU-0 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Mar-05 18:05:53] [TOTAL (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s, 0 Accepted, 0 Rejected
[2018-Mar-05 18:06:05] [GPU-0 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Mar-05 18:06:05] [TOTAL (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s, 0 Accepted, 0 Rejected
[2018-Mar-05 18:06:17] [GPU-0 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Mar-05 18:06:17] [TOTAL (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s, 0 Accepted, 0 Rejected
[2018-Mar-05 18:06:29] [GPU-0 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Mar-05 18:06:30] [TOTAL (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s, 0 Accepted, 0 Rejected
[2018-Mar-05 18:06:40] [GPU-0 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Mar-05 18:06:40] [TOTAL (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s, 0 Accepted, 0 Rejected
[2018-Mar-05 18:06:50] [GPU-0 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Mar-05 18:06:50] [TOTAL (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s, 0 Accepted, 0 Rejected
[2018-Mar-05 18:07:00] [GPU-0 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Mar-05 18:07:00] [TOTAL (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s, 0 Accepted, 0 Rejected
[2018-Mar-05 18:07:10] [GPU-0 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Mar-05 18:07:10] [TOTAL (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s, 0 Accepted, 0 Rejected
[2018-Mar-05 18:07:20] [GPU-0 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Mar-05 18:07:20] [TOTAL (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s, 0 Accepted, 0 Rejected
[2018-Mar-05 18:07:30] [GPU-0 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Mar-05 18:07:30] [TOTAL (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s, 0 Accepted, 0 Rejected

What is this? And how can i spend the rest of my life about it? (sorry I could not resist, yeah)
Ooops! Wrong port. 3443 and miner works, will test it/
Update. 240sol yuors VS 290 dstm's. Miss.

[stzcze]

EWBF 4100   DSTM 4235  Funakoshi 4050   5x 1080ti + 1080.   for a 0.7-1% fee it would be ok.

[Rabinovitch]

On my 5x1070:




I will dig for a little with this miner, but please funakosihi improve it.

[alex-26.2k18]

guys and you did not make a mistake ?? here like altcoyins are discussed. send the moderator

[gsambolin]

EWBF 4100   DSTM 4235  Funakoshi 4050   5x 1080ti + 1080.   for a 0.7-1% fee it would be ok.

What is the DSTM miner and where can I find it?  

7/2 - Update: found it here on bitcoin forum but it is not 144_5 ready.

Thanks in advance

[artful]

not working

why Port changed to ssl-port 8817 and not connected ?

Code:

/funakoshiMiner -l btg.suprnova.cc:8866 -u username.v002 -p x

[2018-Jul-04 11:57:30] [MINER] Port changed to ssl-port 8817
[2018-Jul-04 11:57:30] [MINER] Using pool: btg.suprnova.cc
[2018-Jul-04 11:57:30] [MINER] Starting miner
[2018-Jul-04 11:57:30] [MINER] Connecting to stratum server btg.suprnova.cc:8817
[2018-Jul-04 11:57:30] [GPU-0] FUNAKOSHI-solver starts mining (device-info: GeForce GTX 1080, version: 6.1, device: 0)
[2018-Jul-04 11:57:30] [GPU-1] FUNAKOSHI-solver starts mining (device-info: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, version: 6.1, device: 1)
[2018-Jul-04 11:57:30] [GPU-3] FUNAKOSHI-solver starts mining (device-info: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, version: 6.1, device: 3)
[2018-Jul-04 11:57:30] [GPU-2] FUNAKOSHI-solver starts mining (device-info: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, version: 6.1, device: 2)
[2018-Jul-04 11:57:30] [MINER] Could not connect to stratum server btg.suprnova.cc:8817, Connection refused
[2018-Jul-04 11:57:30] [MINER] Reconnecting in 3 seconds...
[2018-Jul-04 11:57:32] [GPU-1] Temperature: 33, temp-max: 0, temp-min: 0
Power Draw: 31013 milliwatts
[2018-Jul-04 11:57:32] [GPU-0] Temperature: 31, temp-max: 0, temp-min: 0
Power Draw: 25643 milliwatts
[2018-Jul-04 11:57:32] [GPU-3] Temperature: 34, temp-max: 0, temp-min: 0
Power Draw: 30890 milliwatts
[2018-Jul-04 11:57:32] [GPU-2] Temperature: 30, temp-max: 0, temp-min: 0
Power Draw: 37875 milliwatts
[2018-Jul-04 11:57:33] [MINER] read_until: uninitialized

Code:

[2018-Jul-04 11:58:04] [MINER] Reconnecting in 3 seconds...
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:07] [MINER] Connecting to stratum server btg.suprnova.cc:8817
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:07] [MINER] Could not connect to stratum server btg.suprnova.cc:8817, Connection refused
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:07] [MINER] Reconnecting in 3 seconds...
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:10] [MINER] read_until: uninitialized
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:10] [MINER] Reconnecting in 3 seconds...
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:11] [GPU-0 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:11] [GPU-1 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:11] [GPU-2 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:11] [GPU-3 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:11] [TOTAL (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s, 0 Accepted, 0 Rejected
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:13] [MINER] Connecting to stratum server btg.suprnova.cc:8817
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:13] [MINER] Could not connect to stratum server btg.suprnova.cc:8817, Connection refused
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:13] [MINER] Reconnecting in 3 seconds...
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:16] [MINER] read_until: uninitialized
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:16] [MINER] Reconnecting in 3 seconds...
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:19] [MINER] Connecting to stratum server btg.suprnova.cc:8817
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:19] [MINER] Could not connect to stratum server btg.suprnova.cc:8817, Connection refused
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:19] [MINER] Reconnecting in 3 seconds...
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:21] [GPU-0 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:21] [GPU-1 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:21] [GPU-2 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:21] [GPU-3 (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:21] [TOTAL (15 sec)] 0 I/s, 0 Sols/s, 0 Accepted, 0 Rejected
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:22] [MINER] read_until: uninitialized
[2018-Jul-04 11:58:22] [MINER] Reconnecting in 3 seconds...

[Thanhtamtg]

not working

why Port changed to ssl-port 8817 and not connected ?

Me too

[funakoshi]

not working

why Port changed to ssl-port 8817 and not connected ?

Me too

Try adding -144 to command-line BitcoinGold has forked and now uses <144,5> Equihash Parameters.
The -144 causes using the new Proof-Of-Work algorithm.

[sevendwarfs]

I'm using HiveOS (linux) and I'm getting this error when running it.  How do I associate the right CUDA library to it?

Code:

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'                                                                                                     
  what():  CUDA error 'CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version' at line 50      

                                                                 
                                                                                                                                                                        

[kachna]

HEllo,
the linux version not working under Ubuntu 16.04 or 18.04, getting message

root@xxxxx:/miner# ./funakoshiMiner

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
  what():  CUDA error 'CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version' at line 50
Aborted (core dumped)

But cuda 9.1 is installed
root@xxxxx:/miner# dpkg -l | grep cuda
ii  libcudart9.1:amd64                    9.1.85-3ubuntu1                   amd64        NVIDIA CUDA Runtime Library
ii  nvidia-cuda-dev                       9.1.85-3ubuntu1                   amd64        NVIDIA CUDA development files
ii  nvidia-cuda-doc                       9.1.85-3ubuntu1                   all          NVIDIA CUDA and OpenCL documentation
ii  nvidia-cuda-gdb                       9.1.85-3ubuntu1                   amd64        NVIDIA CUDA Debugger (GDB)
ii  nvidia-cuda-toolkit                   9.1.85-3ubuntu1                   amd64        NVIDIA CUDA development toolkit

how to fix this ?

Regards
RG

[funakoshi]

HEllo,
the linux version not working under Ubuntu 16.04 or 18.04, getting message

root@xxxxx:/miner# ./funakoshiMiner

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
  what():  CUDA error 'CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version' at line 50
Aborted (core dumped)

But cuda 9.1 is installed
root@xxxxx:/miner# dpkg -l | grep cuda
ii  libcudart9.1:amd64                    9.1.85-3ubuntu1                   amd64        NVIDIA CUDA Runtime Library
ii  nvidia-cuda-dev                       9.1.85-3ubuntu1                   amd64        NVIDIA CUDA development files
ii  nvidia-cuda-doc                       9.1.85-3ubuntu1                   all          NVIDIA CUDA and OpenCL documentation
ii  nvidia-cuda-gdb                       9.1.85-3ubuntu1                   amd64        NVIDIA CUDA Debugger (GDB)
ii  nvidia-cuda-toolkit                   9.1.85-3ubuntu1                   amd64        NVIDIA CUDA development toolkit

how to fix this ?

Regards
RG

The miner has been compiled using cuda 9.2
Plase try to upgrade to latest CUDA driver from Nvidia website.

[mkrmkr]

Running 12x1080 and 11x1080 rigs with your miner and noticed that ~8 GPU's load stays at 99% and the rest are 85%.

Tried to run two instances of a miner, but the full load gets only those which batch file I run first.

Is there any limitation in a code and can you look into it?

PS. was running ewfb miner before with 40-41 rock stable sols/s but the payout from a pool was same or less day to day. So I believe there is still some potential to squeeze out from this miner:)

Thanks!

[funakoshi]

Running 12x1080 and 11x1080 rigs with your miner and noticed that ~8 GPU's load stays at 99% and the rest are 85%.

Tried to run two instances of a miner, but the full load gets only those which batch file I run first.

Is there any limitation in a code and can you look into it?

PS. was running ewfb miner before with 40-41 rock stable sols/s but the payout from a pool was same or less day to day. So I believe there is still some potential to squeeze out from this miner:)

Thanks!

Can you please tell me more about the environment:
    Operating System,
    Command-Line args that you are using to run the miner,
    Version of Funakoshi-Miner?

[mkrmkr]

Running 12x1080 and 11x1080 rigs with your miner and noticed that ~8 GPU's load stays at 99% and the rest are 85%.

Tried to run two instances of a miner, but the full load gets only those which batch file I run first.

Is there any limitation in a code and can you look into it?

PS. was running ewfb miner before with 40-41 rock stable sols/s but the payout from a pool was same or less day to day. So I believe there is still some potential to squeeze out from this miner:)

Thanks!

Can you please tell me more about the environment:
    Operating System,
    Command-Line args that you are using to run the miner,
    Version of Funakoshi-Miner?

W10Pro [10.0.16299.492] on H110 BTC+, G4400, 8GB RAM with 60GB virtual
funakoshiMiner.exe  -144 -l Europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20595 -u xxx.xxxx
Miner v3.2

[funakoshi]

Running 12x1080 and 11x1080 rigs with your miner and noticed that ~8 GPU's load stays at 99% and the rest are 85%.

Tried to run two instances of a miner, but the full load gets only those which batch file I run first.

Is there any limitation in a code and can you look into it?

PS. was running ewfb miner before with 40-41 rock stable sols/s but the payout from a pool was same or less day to day. So I believe there is still some potential to squeeze out from this miner:)

Thanks!

Can you please tell me more about the environment:
    Operating System,
    Command-Line args that you are using to run the miner,
    Version of Funakoshi-Miner?

W10Pro [10.0.16299.492] on H110 BTC+, G4400, 8GB RAM with 60GB virtual
funakoshiMiner.exe  -144 -l Europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20595 -u xxx.xxxx
Miner v3.2

When you run the miner without specifying which cards to use it uses all cards (thats why the first process access all cards).
You can specify in the command-line which cards to use:
     -cd 0 1 2 ... (selects which cuda-devices meaning GPUs to use - starting from 0)

Using this technique you can select different gpu cards for each process.

[mkrmkr]

Running 12x1080 and 11x1080 rigs with your miner and noticed that ~8 GPU's load stays at 99% and the rest are 85%.
Tried to run two instances of a miner, but the full load gets only those which batch file I run first.
Is there any limitation in a code and can you look into it?
PS. was running ewfb miner before with 40-41 rock stable sols/s but the payout from a pool was same or less day to day. So I believe there is still some potential to squeeze out from this miner:)

Thanks!

Can you please tell me more about the environment:
    Operating System,
    Command-Line args that you are using to run the miner,
    Version of Funakoshi-Miner?

W10Pro [10.0.16299.492] on H110 BTC+, G4400, 8GB RAM with 60GB virtual
funakoshiMiner.exe  -144 -l Europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20595 -u xxx.xxxx
Miner v3.2

When you run the miner without specifying which cards to use it uses all cards (thats why the first process access all cards).
You can specify in the command-line which cards to use:
     -cd 0 1 2 ... (selects which cuda-devices meaning GPUs to use - starting from 0)
Using this technique you can select different gpu cards for each process.

Hi, that's exactly how I was running two instances with different GPUs. After a little investigation I found out that GPU 0-5 always under 99% load and 6-11 varies from 85% to 95% and never gets 99% except running single card in whole rig.
Running -cd 6 7 8 - all ~97%
Running -cd 6 7 8 9 - ranging 85%-95%
And it is not affected if 0-5 are running or not. Running more instances does not help.

[funakoshi]

Running 12x1080 and 11x1080 rigs with your miner and noticed that ~8 GPU's load stays at 99% and the rest are 85%.
Tried to run two instances of a miner, but the full load gets only those which batch file I run first.
Is there any limitation in a code and can you look into it?
PS. was running ewfb miner before with 40-41 rock stable sols/s but the payout from a pool was same or less day to day. So I believe there is still some potential to squeeze out from this miner:)

Thanks!

Can you please tell me more about the environment:
    Operating System,
    Command-Line args that you are using to run the miner,
    Version of Funakoshi-Miner?

W10Pro [10.0.16299.492] on H110 BTC+, G4400, 8GB RAM with 60GB virtual
funakoshiMiner.exe  -144 -l Europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20595 -u xxx.xxxx
Miner v3.2

When you run the miner without specifying which cards to use it uses all cards (thats why the first process access all cards).
You can specify in the command-line which cards to use:
     -cd 0 1 2 ... (selects which cuda-devices meaning GPUs to use - starting from 0)
Using this technique you can select different gpu cards for each process.

Hi, that's exactly how I was running two instances with different GPUs. After a little investigation I found out that GPU 0-5 always under 99% load and 6-11 varies from 85% to 95% and never gets 99% except running single card in whole rig.
Running -cd 6 7 8 - all ~97%
Running -cd 6 7 8 9 - ranging 85%-95%
And it is not affected if 0-5 are running or not. Running more instances does not help.

Funakoshi-Miner splits the work evenly between the cards.
I have no idea what may cause this problem, sorry. Maybe
it is a hardware problem.

[boo50]

FYI
one day of test the same rig and same OC settings give me 5.11% advantage of funakoshi VS ZM on avg hashrate reported by pool, mining votecoin (regular equihash)

on equihash 144_5 people reporting significant advantage of EWBF miner.