For them, if they write anything less than 200 characters it's pretty much guaranteed to be a shitpost.
Padding makes it worse, not better.
Here's one that I can write about Bitcoin vs Gold (putting in the
minimum effort):
you should pick the bitcoin over the gold because the bitcoin is going to the moon and as you can all very well see in the past histories and the charts bitcoin has risen at a really really high level and so thats why i think it will continue to go forward and we will see it be a better investment than gold by a long shot.
324 characters. Does that have
any substance? Would it be any better than this statement? "Bitcoin > Gold. Bitcoin has performed well and I expect it to continue doing so."
Absolutely not. And the fact of the matter is, both of them lack in quality. However, whereas one requires you to strain your eyes and read, the other is quick and easy to understand.
I acquiesce that the key part here lies not with the actual grammar, however, but the content. But! Grammar and proper sentence structure
improves understanding. If you have a bad post, sure. We'll report it. If you have an incomprehensible post, regardless of intended meaning, then it will be considered spam by default.
Understood?