SUBSTRATUM: how communication works in the "open discussion" group

[afriace]

Hello guys,

I´m a true believer of Substratum, because I really like the idea. I invested in SUB like 3 months ago. The developer said, that there will be a beta before 2018. I know it´s normal, that things got delayed, but I don´t understand, why the developer are more interested in the marketing than in the product. There will be even a TV spot in the united states. All this without a working product or even a beta released. I´m in the SUB telegram group and today I started to ask the community/developer, why they are more focussing on the marketing than the product. Nobody could give me a real answer and I got banned. So the admins of the SUB telegram "open discussion" group made me mouthdead just because of having no arguments. That´s not how a open discussion works. So let´s compare SUB to some more serious coin like Oyster (PRL):

Oyster delivered the testnet before schedule, not like SUB.
Oyster said, they will not make marketing before working product, not like SUB.
The Oyster community is very technical. They answered my question very well, not like SUB with all the kids asking "when lambo"

[TdK911]

Too bad they Reacted that way and couldn't take your question serious. I guess that is another minus point for the team's communication in this case. Seems like some of the Admins have more fun answering questions of people who start the sentence with when beta or when moon then answering real technical and strategy questions...

[chybinspirace]

I'm in SUB for couple months too. It seems to me as market went down,  then whole hype about SUB just went down too. I was among "first" people on SUB telegram and It was good community, but I left because as you mentioned, it is like only kids "when Lambo" "when Moon." Quite sad, it is good project. But I'm still hodling