⚡MARQUISE $MUSEUM: ABT/NFT Bluechip (2017 certified) Waves/Uniswap/XCP

[suchmoon]

OK its not exactly a scam but rather a highly illiquid project that isn't going anywhere. Well, that's not worth declaring anybody to be a scammer over.

How about asking for a $30m loan?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5325549

Scam? Idiocy? Idiotic scam?

[MarquiseMuseum]

OK its not exactly a scam but rather a highly illiquid project that isn't going anywhere. Well, that's not worth declaring anybody to be a scammer over.

How about asking for a $30m loan?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5325549

Scam? Idiocy? Idiotic scam?

$90m.

[crypto_trader#43xzEXrP]

https://twitter.com/MarquiseMuseum/status/1373614347872841733

It is soon possible to swap Waves M2 tokens for Opensea NFTs

Waves/M2 market size is fixed to $200 000 which is many times more USDT per token
compared to where it is trading today [https://www.coinlore.com/coin/marquise-museum/historical-data],
so this is a nice deal for top 10 wallets and it can be recycled when I receive swapped M2.
So it's not a 1 time deal, it's a waves exclusive.
Swap is reversible but you must send NFTs back to my Opensea account to receive Waves M2 back.

This is the preliminary Museum account where collection will be hosted:

https://opensea.io/accounts/MarquiseMuseumNFT

Hello, MarquiseMuseum.
I see you created on ethereum blockchain a new token (with 66,000 total supply).

This token, have the name a MARQUISEMUSEUM, and you naming this as NFT.
As I understand, you mean an NFT-technology, right?
If yes, can you add this link somewhere?
Because when I begin to read this topic, I can not understand what means NFT-abbreviature, while I not googled this, myself.

As I understand, you can provide a some swap
between Original MarquiseMuseum (660,000,000 total)
and new asset Ethereum MarquiseMuseum-NFT (66,000 total).
And as I understand, this swap is reversive, right?

And as I understand, right now, Waves MarquiseMuseum
have a fixed market cap - $200k,
just because each 1M Waves MarquiseMuseum
can be exchanged on 1 giclée, which are stable cost $300 on the market. Right?

This is OK, just because in the case if I had 7000 WAVES,
and if I did not sold this in WUSD,
I could buy all the rest of Waves MarquiseMuseum
at price 0.00002602 WAVES / Waves MarquiseMuseum,
and at current waves-price $11.71/WAVES,
each Waves MarquiseMuseum should cost not lesser than $0.0003046942,
with market cap $201098.172 for all 660M,
and with value of my stack of 391M ($119135.4322, or 10173.82 WAVES at price $11.71).
And yes, I had more than 10k WAVES, I had 11600 WAVES, there, on wavesplatform,
because I deposited 2 real BTC, there.
After all, I could buy 2 crypto-books at price 150M Waves MarquiseMuseum.
All this means, market cap of 200k for all M2 is correct, right now.
And such as this market cap is provides by exchanges through giclées, so therefore the price on your giclées is correct too.
So respect, for you.

But as you remember, I did not sold my Waves MarquiseMuseum, even at price 0.00055000 WAVES/Waves MarquiseMuseum
just because I planned to sell this all, as a global crypto-asset,
at minimum price 1 cent, after listing this asset on https://coinmarketcap.com
and after add this asset on a many-many another exchanges.
In this case, we could raise $6,600,000 or even higher,
and in this case, your business, and you are, as an Owner of this,
could to get a great profit from this all, as a percent from our sales.

Maybe I can do this in future, or maybe no, idk.
I need to carefully evaluate my crypto assets, maybe I could take advertising using this.
I have a lot of different crypto, and some volumes I already proposed to sell.

I see NFT-token have a market cap ($100,000,000), and creation of this token is good idea to expand your business, art, and goods.
Do you planning to create a new tokens on another ethereum-like blockchains?
For example, you can go here: https://miningpoolstats.stream and type "ethash" in algo-filter there.
Then, you can see some ethereum-like coins there too, and maybe, on their blockchains, you can create a new, your own assets, with your name.

[crypto_trader#43xzEXrP]

I remember the reason for moving from Ethereum to waves, because Eth is complex platform to work on, and expensive.

Hm... As variant... Xerom! There is no more than 4 millions blocks, and I see some smart contracts, in their block-explorer, here.
But I do not know how to create ERC-20 tokens on xerom-blockchain, maybe you can.

And I have already proposed here, earlier, a some XERO, and of course, I have this.
But there is unstable mainnet, there is only two mining pools: https://miningpoolstats.stream/xerom
and just few nodes: http://stats.exlo.tech
so, maybe, will be better to use an another ethereum-like coin, from that list, that I posted earlier.

Anyway, I have full dump of XERO-blockchain, and all balances, and smart-contracts,
and I can support this network, by do solo-mining with my hash-power, in future.
And anyone can do this too, for a long-term, because it's open-source, and this have a zero-premine.

[nutildah]

That's quite a lengthy response. I can narrow down mine to a couple things, in a non-judgmental way:

It was a about a dozen Russian investors on Waves and none of them opted to swap into Giclées.

Herein lies your biggest problem, IMHO. The entire value of your project hinges on your ability to deliver this crucial end of the bargain. So far, whether it was just through lack of opportunity or whatever, you have been unable to demonstrate that you are capable of doing this. If you can't manufacture and deliver hundreds of these things, the price of your token will suffer, and I think this contributes to the lack of confidence investors/exchanges/auction houses have in your project.

Is it possible that there is zero value? No there is literally value because of sales records since 2018 on waves up until today and ongoing.

"Sales records"? Are you talking about something other than trading on the Waves DEX?

[MarquiseMuseum]

Artworks are secondary to crypto integration with 2017 timestamp. This art was a place holder to demonstrate business method. I originally wanted to do what Nifty and SignArt are doing but understood that it would be too much work. Marquise $Museum was designed as a crypto equivalent to record studio, not a band. As is evident in the name itself as museums exhibit multiple artists.

Instead of representing artists with their own portfolios, I hire them to enhance M1 placeholder portfolio and promote them through this asset. They also get royalty on sales. Promotion will commence in pace with commercial rollout.

It is being tested for public consideration after 2 technically proficient artists from US and Brazil improved collages in combination with other design upgrades that can make it viable for retail despite not fitting into any retail theme.

If there is evidence that an established high visibility gallery or auction house is unable to move this item then obviously we have a problem somewhere. But it is not possible at this point in time to make this conclusion.

It has to fit a retail theme to sell retail.

In a traditional marketplace art must have traction without secondary USP, agreed.

There is zero reasons to spam leads when project is in the money at the same time as NFT market infrastructure is emerging as we speak.

Focus is on inbound leads.

Why avoid NFT angle when is the most obvious source of value not the art as a standalone.

The best I can offer retail investors is x5 here:

https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES

Swap cap is $200k
0.1% of NFT supply
40 panels on 660m M2 supply

If you own 16.5m M2 or 33m, 49.5m etc. you will be eligible to convert into NFT when they launch soon, if I can find a solidity dev to wrap the ERC20:

https://opensea.io/accounts/MarquiseMuseumNFT

It is possible that there will be a test auction starting at $1 together with Opensea platform promotion to measure asset value. Otherwise price is fixed at $5000 per NFT.

https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01aceab842049e1f3f

[CaVO32]

That's quite a lengthy response. I can narrow down mine to a couple things, in a non-judgmental way:

It was a about a dozen Russian investors on Waves and none of them opted to swap into Giclées.

Herein lies your biggest problem, IMHO. The entire value of your project hinges on your ability to deliver this crucial end of the bargain. So far, whether it was just through lack of opportunity or whatever, you have been unable to demonstrate that you are capable of doing this. If you can't manufacture and deliver hundreds of these things, the price of your token will suffer, and I think this contributes to the lack of confidence investors/exchanges/auction houses have in your project.

Is it possible that there is zero value? No there is literally value because of sales records since 2018 on waves up until today and ongoing.

"Sales records"? Are you talking about something other than trading on the Waves DEX?

I have seen this project for quite a while now. And based from what I am seeing, I don't think the dev will change the dull journey of marquise, even if he is now going to the NFT venture. But of course, I don't have any idea if he is getting from this project after all these years. Waves dex has very little activity going on even if they migrated to waves.exchange. So I don't know if he really believes himself that there is actually active trading going on in waves platform. So I won't be surprised if one day, he will just give up on this project.

[nutildah]

Any updates news?

Being targeted by the military isn't good enough for you? 

Which military, if you don't mind my asking?

[nutildah]

Well I mean, at least you're not doing the whole "fake bids" thing.

Can I make a suggestion? You should make just 1 NFT edition of each print. You've made 999 and are selling them for $5k a pop... Kind of takes away from the specialness of something when there are 998 copies of it out there for sale.

It would also be a good idea to make some sort of descriptive back story for the piece: how did it come about? who made it? what's the artist all about? what does this piece mean?

Just my 2 cents.

[nutildah]

Hello. I have some Marquise Museum tokens on the Waves Exchange. I would like to know information about the project to know if it is still active and therefore know if I did not waste the investment.

With 16 500 000 or $5000 WM2 equivalent you can swap into anyone of these Opensea NFTs except the book license:

https://opensea.io/assets/marquise-museum-s-pimp-fashion

With WM2 equal to $300, an archival giclée can be redeemed from the Museum to your home.

@DeFT1913 you should take him up on this offer. If you have the equivalent of $300 in the project's Waves tokens, then you should redeem them for this offer and chronicle your experience here.

A successfully-completed first transaction can go a long way in establishing the commercial stepping stones for this project.

Just my humble opinion.

[nutildah]

It was already documented on page 1 #14, 3 years ago.

That was a giveaway, not a sale.

So, at last what I've been waiting for has finally arrived. A couple of months ago, I saw MarquiseMuseum on Twitter. Out of curiosity I participated in the Twitter Airdrop (now completed), link: https://twitter.com/MarquiseMuseum/status/969926470704549889.

Also saw a guessing game (link: https://twitter.com/MarquiseMuseum/status/968516097271042048) there Marquise asked cryptotwitter to guess where he's at, clue was it's his favorite city. Gave my answer, and guess what? I got it! Woot! So, here's what I got for giving the correct answer:
...
Thank you MarquiseMuseum for the gift! I am super stoked not only with the artwork, but also with the vision behind Marquise Museum Redeemable Art Token Project!

It demonstrates that you indeed possess a physical product and are capable of shipping items, but seeing as how he didn't actually redeem the waves tokens (they are still sitting in his wallet) I wouldn't call it a "sale." You need one of those.

[MarquiseMuseum]

All ABTs are now converted and this is the end of a 4 year crypto journey.

Returning when there are sales and this project is ungated by the gatekeepers.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3223136.msg58382506#msg58382506

[MikeSorino]

I saw a post about a physical showroom in Germany, is it already in operation and if not, when is it planned? and is there any specifics about its location?

[MarquiseMuseum]

I saw a post about a physical showroom in Germany, is it already in operation and if not, when is it planned? and is there any specifics about its location?

Online is priority

[cryptomaxsun]

MarquiseMuseum, I remember you in the topic of cryptocurrency Desire spoke about its application, the future.
But now this coin is dead.
Don't you believe in her anymore?
What was the reason for your choice?

[MarquiseMuseum]

Mercatox did not agree to reverse take over of DSR when offered. I complained about delisting but dev abandoned ship, explorer stopped and it was also delisted from Stex and Coinexchange which were two liquidity sources. Coinexchange itself went belly up in 2018 during the worst bear market in any industry since the inception of the industrial revolution 150 years ago. Think about that for a second.

If Mercatox agreed to DSR M2 swap then anyone with DSR could now access this NFT supply. There were other issues with that coin besides the botched Mercatox deal because one guy was mining everything and probably had 51% access. But the wallet and tech was solid I never had any problems but now it doesn't work anymore.

The masternodes from 2018 failed because they weren't part of an integrated enough ecosystem. Too many nano caps trying to make it they were all clones of each other without USP.

Lazyboozer thought he could pull a Satoshi and vanish like Houdini. He didn't understand that once a crypto is deployed it must be monitored with community management and market making. In his case it would not have mattered if he stayed around because masternodes as a concept was too weak and the market segment was saturated.

90% of all small business fail after 5 years this is true for NFTs too, everything commercial. It is a high risk venture which is why investment amount should be limited until evidence of consistent traction whch takes time and insider connections at this stage of market maturity.

The NFTs today all use third party NFTx platforms and only very few NFTs on those platforms qualify for any form of lending as the vetting is gated by platform operators.

The opportunity for unestablished artists to launch stand alone cryptos is over because barrier to entry is too high and gated by crypto leaders in China and Russia but also New York and West Coast.

The biggest problem when going at it alone on zero budget is lack of consistent visibility but even when paying for marketing ROI is dubious because you need to pay $1000 or more up front and compete with huge platforms for ad positions and search ranking and they can afford to overpay because their business model is different and backed by VC. So how many times do I pay this $1000 for fleeting marketing before pulling a $300 sale? And How do I verify that the clicks are non diluted by click farms? Impossible to know but more probable than not.

By the way I am considering stopping support for M2 on waves after WA expressedly told me that they will not enable verified ticker. If these large platforms are actively sabotaging micro projects there is no chance for survival and organic trading interest seems low. The NFTx token is not a requirement to operate NFTs it was simply a second layer solution to increase liquidity and use as a branding option.

NFT collectors on Ethereum do not value NFTx as a concept at all.

If the market is not supported in the future investors will be able to swap their M2 for NFTs on Opensea. M2 supply will then be burned and replaced with Uniswap when NFT prices go up.

If you want to keep the M2/Waves market then it is time to call WA and complain about the ticker issue.

So it is right around that 90% 5 year mark as far as waves integration but the project is completed and by its nature NFTs dont require any form of maintenance.

Commercially this appears to have joined the rest of the 90% startup failure rate but this was a personal hobby that was field tested for commercial viability and there was never any real expectation that it would sell.

$300 is nothing just buy and hold it if you like the art. It's no sensation but there is an edge compared to new NFTs and it is 1000 time cheaper than Bona fide Vintage NFTs.

If I hadn't owned the entire supply myself and knew about it from the forum, I would buy some. No other ABT so far as 2017 is backed by artworks they are mostly Stables, Gold.

This was originally appraised at $47 000 per NFT by Swedish Chamber of Commerce with accolades for outstanding stylistic delivery compared to its 24 bit counterparts. Because of a technicality that there is no custom coding in the generic ERC-20 contract, price was reduced to $300.

https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

$300 is only to get the ball rolling and attain supply decentralization after which the 5% aftermarket residuals will kick in and ascend in pace with organic price growth. Some of this 5% royalty can be shared with investors and I can calibrate it to 5% or 20% it is a matter of preference. You should buy the Edition #2 at $300 it is a good generational bet but no quick flip. There is very low risk because the project is quite simple at its core and and can be operated by a hamster in a spinning wheel if needed a 5 year old can do this at this point but getting here was the hard part and expensive in time and money.

So the risk you take is do I get my $300 back? This is such an insignificant factor that I can almost insure the Museum can post buy back offers at this rate in perpetuity to your Opensea account if you place it for aftermarket sale.

Prices were reduced from $89 000 to $300 10 days ago and the only reason why someone hasn't already sniped the entire collection is because of very low visibility and no one had time to react to it yet.

Someone will take these NFTs eventually it is a matter of who it is and when.

https://opensea.io/collection/pimpfashion2



Once Edition 2 is sold at $300 E#3 will cost double and demand will also increase because all of the sudden there is now proof of traction and organic volume on Opensea which will enable the collection to rank on the main page which causes feedback loop. This is a narrow window of opportunity for retail to get onboard because they will be priced out immediately. If you have $10k to invest in this moment this is where it goes simple as that, everything else already x20-x100 since this time last year and it's only on a technicality that this isn't already trading $4m as the SCC appraisal concluded in August.

To put it in context Edition 1 is not even obtainable with 17 of the 34 NFTs listed as English auctions ending in March 2035. The remaining 17 average $350 000 total $5.9m.

[cryptomaxsun]

Thank you for the detailed answer.
I am the holder of Desire coins and it is sad to realize that these coins are worthless.
You probably have a lot of coins too?

[MarquiseMuseum]

Royalty for Edition #2 was increased from 5% to 10% and a share will be airdropped to M2 investors:



http://dev.pywaves.org/assets/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB

For Edition #2, 6 000 000 M2 is required for swap in exchange for Opensea NFT Equivalent to $300

→ https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES
→ https://www.marquisemuseum.com/cube
→ https://opensea.io/collection/pimpfashion2

The collection was appraised to $47 000 per NFT but there is no custom coding in the ERC-20 contract so price is reduced:

https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

[MarquiseMuseum]

$M2 is trading at substance value as production cost of $M2 NFT collection was $125-$200 ex $100 Opensea Tx fee for interchain swap

2021-12-24:

a new collection is published:

https://opensea.io/collection/indian-nations-community-fund

"INCF is an unregistered NFT fundraiser for the Gypsy people in Bohemia. All proceeds are audited by Marquise Museum in partnership with accredited accountant & public annual reporting. 20% management fee.
Examples of revenue redistribution from NFT image sales:
Basic Clothing/Medicine/Dental care/Educational material/Childrens Toys
Public transportation, Orphanage field trips/Seasonal gifts/Small events funding
Food, Limited Housing & Utility support, Tele Communications/Internet
The complete list of expenditures is presented in annual report and remains similar in character to given examples"

2022-01-10:

Progress update:

https://docdro.id/16w9roe

[YTTTDIM]

Do you plan to implement only your project or is there an opportunity for different artists to join the platform later?