Martingale for win, my own experience

[Saidmod]

You martingale for a short period of time and few bets try more and Lets see if you'll get the same result as positive profit. But if you do that you must have a big amount of balance to cover your continous losses during martingale.

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

[JL421]

The only martingale I know it works is not in luck games. I have tried with small amount in sport betting, always have picked a random team in soccer with odd 2 to 2.20 and place a bet on them, out of 20 times trying even if you are a complete amateur with no experience you will win at least one time and in the end you will double your initial bet.

Of course you need to have a big bankroll, but you can try even with a low bankroll that can be multiplied 20 times, or 20 tries.
I know this is not the most perfect strategy and it takes a lot of patience to apply in sport betting compared to luck games but it is proven here.

Anyway my advice is to not experiment with luck games, there is the house edge which at a certain point will come on top for some time and make you lose all of your money.

Your advice is correct using this martingale method in luck games is risky because of house edge but we can use it in sports betting. as you said out of 20 bets we can win at least one so our investment will back with profit. this is for no experience players but if you have knowledge of sports then you no need to wait for 20 bets within 5 bets you will win one bet. the idea is good lets try this.

Higher odds doesn't mean higher profit it means lesser the chance of that being true I would suggest not to try this strategy it doesn't work I have tried it on tennis and barely got my initial deposit back , don't forget you do this to make profit and not to just get your initial amount if you think in this way you wouldn't try it as it wouldn't be worth

[Hhampuz]

In essence, the Martingale system requires you to double the previous stock for any losing bets you make. For example, let's assume your first bet on the blackjack table is $ 5 and you lose your hand. At this point your next bet will need to be $ 10.

This sequence basically continues until you win the hand, so if your second bet is lost you will need to stock $ 20 in third hand and so on and so on. Basically, it's the power of your strategy to keep doubling your bet every time you lose with that prospect when you finally win the hand.

Once you do win a math hand from a system dictate that you will show the advantages of one unit. In basic terms, a unit is defined as your initial stock size. So, in this example, after losing three hands in a row, players will need to stock $ 40 in their fourth hand, taking their overall exposure to $ 75. After winning this hand the player receives $ 80 that will leave them with a $ profit 5

You do not play the martingale system in BlackJack, haha.. Are you high? .

The whole idea behind martingale is to use it in games that are (basically) 50/50, and that is why it works. Roulette is a great example, 50/50 on Dice is another.

[el kaka22]

About examples of application of the Martingale theory in practice, you can read here: http://sportstatist.com/the-pitfalls-of-martingale-money-management-strategy/

I really do not see any point reading as most of the time, no matter the strategy of martingale you want to lose, if the house edge decides to pick on you or luck is just not on your side, all the strategies will fail and you will be wondering who you offended. What is important is to see gambling as fun as that is reality and anyone who cannot do that should not just try gambling. Having the mindset will be able to help you control the impulses and accept any outcome.

[ethereumhunter]

You martingale for a short period of time and few bets try more and Lets see if you'll get the same result as positive profit. But if you do that you must have a big amount of balance to cover your continous losses during martingale.

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

although I don't know too much about martingale strategy, I can say that the strategy will not work if you don't have a luck. but if there is one person can win the games for short or long time, then I can say that person have his luck so he can win the money too. soon you will lost your money with any of strategy and I hope that you realize before you lost all of your money.

[serjent05]

You martingale for a short period of time and few bets try more and Lets see if you'll get the same result as positive profit. But if you do that you must have a big amount of balance to cover your continous losses during martingale.

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

although I don't know too much about martingale strategy, I can say that the strategy will not work if you don't have a luck. but if there is one person can win the games for short or long time, then I can say that person have his luck so he can win the money too. soon you will lost your money with any of strategy and I hope that you realize before you lost all of your money.

True, and martingale had been proven to be a good method for a short span betting but it will eat up all your fund in a long run session.  We can do it again and again but in just limited set of time.  I have done this strategy and observed that the longer we play using this method, the longer losing streak we will experience thus, emptying our bankroll.

[gabmen]

You martingale for a short period of time and few bets try more and Lets see if you'll get the same result as positive profit. But if you do that you must have a big amount of balance to cover your continous losses during martingale.

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

although I don't know too much about martingale strategy, I can say that the strategy will not work if you don't have a luck. but if there is one person can win the games for short or long time, then I can say that person have his luck so he can win the money too. soon you will lost your money with any of strategy and I hope that you realize before you lost all of your money.

True, and martingale had been proven to be a good method for a short span betting but it will eat up all your fund in a long run session.  We can do it again and again but in just limited set of time.  I have done this strategy and observed that the longer we play using this method, the longer losing streak we will experience thus, emptying our bankroll.

Well i've tried it. It sometimes makes you think that the gambling site doesn't want you to win. I mean, seriously, .05 got lost in under 4 rolls. A three roll losing streak did it for me. You would have to have a serious amount of capital for this to work and it isn't a guarantee at all.

[Hhampuz]

You martingale for a short period of time and few bets try more and Lets see if you'll get the same result as positive profit. But if you do that you must have a big amount of balance to cover your continous losses during martingale.

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

although I don't know too much about martingale strategy, I can say that the strategy will not work if you don't have a luck. but if there is one person can win the games for short or long time, then I can say that person have his luck so he can win the money too. soon you will lost your money with any of strategy and I hope that you realize before you lost all of your money.

True, and martingale had been proven to be a good method for a short span betting but it will eat up all your fund in a long run session.  We can do it again and again but in just limited set of time.  I have done this strategy and observed that the longer we play using this method, the longer losing streak we will experience thus, emptying our bankroll.

Well i've tried it. It sometimes makes you think that the gambling site doesn't want you to win. I mean, seriously, .05 got lost in under 4 rolls. A three roll losing streak did it for me. You would have to have a serious amount of capital for this to work and it isn't a guarantee at all.

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong .. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

[serjent05]

You martingale for a short period of time and few bets try more and Lets see if you'll get the same result as positive profit. But if you do that you must have a big amount of balance to cover your continous losses during martingale.

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

I disagree, martingale is good for a limited time session.  if you use it for a long run, you will be surprised that your bankroll is already depleted.  I have experience on this kind of method.  I can say, it is good at the beginning but the longer you play , the longer the losing streak occurs.  Aside from that, a controlled martingale is good but an automatic long run martingale is very risky.

[CryptoProphet]

You martingale for a short period of time and few bets try more and Lets see if you'll get the same result as positive profit. But if you do that you must have a big amount of balance to cover your continous losses during martingale.

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

I disagree, martingale is good for a limited time session.  if you use it for a long run, you will be surprised that your bankroll is already depleted.  I have experience on this kind of method.  I can say, it is good at the beginning but the longer you play , the longer the losing streak occurs.  Aside from that, a controlled martingale is good but an automatic long run martingale is very risky.

Yes, this is really good for limited time session.
Do you use it too?

[CryptoProphet]

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong .. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

10-15 losses or 30-40 losses is impossible because winning chance 50% (1/2) like head/tail.

[Pan Troglodytes]

You martingale for a short period of time and few bets try more and Lets see if you'll get the same result as positive profit. But if you do that you must have a big amount of balance to cover your continous losses during martingale.

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

No mate, martingale strategy will not work and especially not in a long time. I've made a post about it like 5 minutes ago, there is really no point repeating that, please have a read if you'd like to know why:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3073061.msg31928147#msg31928147

[flower1024]

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong .. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

10-15 losses or 30-40 losses is impossible because winning chance 50% (1/2) like head/tail.

It is possible and 10-15 loses are common in gambling. we think the Martingale is an advantage for us and we can make a profit but actually, this is an advantage for casinos. did you ever heard after 20+ loses any gambler beat casino while using this method I think no one. Because 99% casino only wins this long run.

[CryptoProphet]

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong .. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

10-15 losses or 30-40 losses is impossible because winning chance 50% (1/2) like head/tail.

It is possible and 10-15 loses are common in gambling. we think the Martingale is an advantage for us and we can make a profit but actually, this is an advantage for casinos. did you ever heard after 20+ loses any gambler beat casino while using this method I think no one. Because 99% casino only wins this long run.

I never catched 10-15 loses with 50% winning chance.
I playing the game with provably fair system only

[smoothenough]

Lucky you crypto, probably doing it in long run won't work as well as for you in short.

[marlboroza]

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

No it doesn't and it is not effective way to get profit, stop spamming gambling section with nonsense.

True, and martingale had been proven to be a good method for a short span betting but it will eat up all your fund in a long run session.  We can do it again and again but in just limited set of time.  I have done this strategy and observed that the longer we play using this method, the longer losing streak we will experience thus, emptying our bankroll.

Long bad streak can occur in first 50 rolls. It is not proven by anyone that martingale is good method, even in short run.

I never catched 10-15 loses with 50% winning chance.
I playing the game with provably fair system only

Don't worry, you will 

[crwth]

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong .. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

10-15 losses or 30-40 losses is impossible because winning chance 50% (1/2) like head/tail.

It is possible and 10-15 loses are common in gambling. we think the Martingale is an advantage for us and we can make a profit but actually, this is an advantage for casinos. did you ever heard after 20+ loses any gambler beat casino while using this method I think no one. Because 99% casino only wins this long run.

I never catched 10-15 loses with 50% winning chance.
I playing the game with provably fair system only

You should definitely be playing in a provably fair system only and the thing is, there is still a possibility of facing that continuous loss and it could definitely occur when the time is unlucky. There's a high chance of it when you play for a long time.

[Caladonian]

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong .. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

10-15 losses or 30-40 losses is impossible because winning chance 50% (1/2) like head/tail.

It is possible and 10-15 loses are common in gambling. we think the Martingale is an advantage for us and we can make a profit but actually, this is an advantage for casinos. did you ever heard after 20+ loses any gambler beat casino while using this method I think no one. Because 99% casino only wins this long run.

I never catched 10-15 loses with 50% winning chance.
I playing the game with provably fair system only

You should definitely be playing in a provably fair system only and the thing is, there is still a possibility of facing that continuous loss and it could definitely occur when the time is unlucky. There's a high chance of it when you play for a long time.

Personally we can speak according to what we experienced before, 20 loses in the road is always possible when you are playing for much longer time, might be possible that you are not too greedy and if you  achieved what you are aiming you already quit and enjoy, but keep in mind that it's
not always a lucky day for you, time will come that you will then suffer and losing streak will show to the point that you are not expecting it to happen.

[chris200x9]

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong .. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

10-15 losses or 30-40 losses is impossible because winning chance 50% (1/2) like head/tail.

It is possible and 10-15 loses are common in gambling. we think the Martingale is an advantage for us and we can make a profit but actually, this is an advantage for casinos. did you ever heard after 20+ loses any gambler beat casino while using this method I think no one. Because 99% casino only wins this long run.

I never catched 10-15 loses with 50% winning chance.
I playing the game with provably fair system only

I have faced more than 10 continuous losses with a setting of 50.8%. This game runs on a probably fair system so you may get first many wins and fewer losses but if you continue to play for more time then you may get continuous more losses. Still, gambling house is not cheating you but just you're unlucky to get so many continuous losses.

[futuret]

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong .. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

10-15 losses or 30-40 losses is impossible because winning chance 50% (1/2) like head/tail.

It is possible and 10-15 loses are common in gambling. we think the Martingale is an advantage for us and we can make a profit but actually, this is an advantage for casinos. did you ever heard after 20+ loses any gambler beat casino while using this method I think no one. Because 99% casino only wins this long run.

I never catched 10-15 loses with 50% winning chance.
I playing the game with provably fair system only

I have faced more than 10 continuous losses with a setting of 50.8%. This game runs on a probably fair system so you may get first many wins and fewer losses but if you continue to play for more time then you may get continuous more losses. Still, gambling house is not cheating you but just you're unlucky to get so many continuous losses.

The real problem with this strategy is that a big amount of money is required to get profit. The more you play, the more are the chances of winning. But how many shots one can really give? In order to make 10 shots, a person must not only have a good amount of money but some persistency and guts too. Else, it even sounds painful to face 10 losses in a row. However, nothing can be better than recovering the loss and winning extra but again, such a risky and difficult strategy it is.