DooMAD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 3104
Leave no FUD unchallenged
|
|
February 23, 2018, 04:11:18 PM |
|
I don't see it being a viable solution. By the time you've added all the labels for the blocks you've just compressed, with all the space that's going to take up, it's not going to be any smaller. Plus, it's less resource intensive to point to a single block and read it than it is to decompress and scan through a large one. Also, since hashes are effectively strings of random characters, they're not the easiest thing to apply compression to anyway. If anything, it's likely less efficient than what we're currently doing. If it was really as simple as this patent makes out, someone would have implemented it already.
|