|
asdlolciterquit
|
 |
August 11, 2018, 12:01:14 PM |
|
How can they know if the icos have failed? the devs themself told that they stop to develop their projects?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tahdayi
Jr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 1
|
|
August 11, 2018, 08:09:01 PM |
|
Yes, now with the ico is very difficult in this market, if the coin will collect the amount that after entering the exchange the price is rolled to the bottom
|
EASY FEEDBACK, WORKING SINCE 2015 (https://www.easyfeedbacktoken.io/en) |
|
|
silver23
Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 10
|
|
August 11, 2018, 08:11:05 PM |
|
Yeah sure, i agree with that.
I think we need to be a smart to choose some ico to invest.
And rating of ico is not really good, when rating is great but the reality is not good and fail.
Becareful to choose some ico.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrbuzz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
|
|
August 11, 2018, 08:12:02 PM |
|
This is a very terrible statistics and I think that it is fair, for some projects we still do not know the truth, what they do and how they develop projects today? Maybe they just immigrate the work? I think that this is possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
silverston
|
|
August 11, 2018, 08:14:51 PM |
|
On the bear market in general, most of the ISO fails, and this applies to even the coolest projects, unfortunately! Now many carry the dates of crowdsales
|
|
|
|
sergey_vass
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
|
|
August 11, 2018, 08:23:36 PM |
|
This is not a good development in the cryptospace. The statistics is discouraging to investors but I feel is common for most start-ups to fail at the early stage even in the traditional business community.  It is necessary for investors to be well acquainted with all the information about the ICO project there are supporting and measure the risk before getting in. Failure is a possibility as most ICOs are start-ups or even ideas. |
|
|
|
|
Krezi777
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 0
|
|
August 11, 2018, 08:30:53 PM |
|
If you participate in the ICO then you certainly have the thought that at least someday there will be generosity normal. The people who participate in the ICO are very much I see patient.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jtbcoins
|
|
August 11, 2018, 08:37:02 PM |
|
Yeah, it's true. I didn't invest in failed ICOs but I invested with losses. And now the number of failed ICOs increasing day by day...
|
|
|
|
|
|
lichnosam
|
|
August 12, 2018, 08:31:22 AM |
|
seems like a high number to me alot of these coisn raised a bunch of funds they have enough money to hold them over for much longer than a year.
Yes, seems like the worrying trend with these ICOs and the money they are raising is that not enough of the ICOs will turn out successful. ICOs are not delivering at all on their promised timelines or that their ICO stage of the project is purposely taking longer. |
|
|
|
|
|
blockchainmarketus
|
|
August 12, 2018, 08:51:01 AM |
|
I do not know what is the definition of failed used here, if it means price dump then we cannot say that the project has failed, while i think only the low quality projects have faded away who have struggled with everything like presenting a product or service or even listing on a decent exchange. So always do your research and invest only in quality projects during ico.
Yeah, I also don't understand the word fail. Fail means not geting invest, yeah some of ICO failed, failed to implement the projects, yes some of them failed. There are too many scams ICos that make the projects failed. I agree with that. In the case, in my opinion, SOMe Icos and projects made succesful investment crowdsale and succes in appy the roadmap. Populus with invoice market, bancor, bat, RLC and other big projects now live, Bankex is too. I think some of ICOs are succesful. |
|
|
|
|
maitexisi
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 146
Merit: 1
|
|
August 12, 2018, 08:52:27 AM |
|
I agree there are too many useless projects. I often fall into an almost desperate deception.
Investors should now be smart about putting money into an ICO and carefully understanding the basics of the project to reduce risk.
|
MUST.IO
THE FINANCIAL REVOLUTION (https://must.io/) |
|
|
|
trash321
|
|
August 12, 2018, 08:53:39 AM |
|
46% is a very large amount, probably the figure is overestimated, it seems to me that this is so, because if it were not so, it would be possible to assume that every second project is a scum. It's not like that. So I do not think that's true.
|
|
|
|
|
burakdat
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 2
"I invest and Doing Bounty Campaign"
|
|
August 12, 2018, 08:54:39 AM |
|
Maybe it is not only 46% of failing ICO projects? Well if it is really 46% then i guess those ICO who failed should conduct a study on how they can get a project successfully or they should know their weakness and strengths on promoting ICO projects. I do believe that it is also the team who market the project will going to determine its success. The more connections the team has with prospect investors the greater chance that the project will going to succeed. |
JUR Alliance | https://jur.io/ | Join the Legal Revolution!
Justice as a Service Infrastructure |
|
|
Dylanbee
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
August 12, 2018, 09:42:21 AM |
|
Check out those projects and you will realise over 70% of them are just built on fancy whitepapers and no real working product for a real life use. I think investors have gotten wiser and won't even put their funds on a project that doesn't have atleast a minium viable product(MVP).
|
|
|
|
|
crypto4earn
Copper Member
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 0
|
|
August 12, 2018, 06:52:38 PM |
|
its solitary happens on the grounds that in today's situation it's hard to confidence any wander in light of the fact that most the endeavors make an ICO only for gathering of assets. the greater part of the Governments are there to shield their natives from these Scammers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
onyebuchi81
|
|
August 12, 2018, 07:33:34 PM |
|
Why do people equate drop in prices to failed project. It's true some have lost more than 200% of their ICO value but it doesn't mean it's a failed project. I can remember when eth was trading at 1300 dollars but is hovering somewhere around 300 dollars but we don't call it a failed project. The only time we can call a project a failed project is when that project has been abandoned but as far as there is work going behind the scene no matter how small I think it still has the potential to survive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opnsrc
|
|
August 16, 2018, 10:13:56 AM |
|
46% is a very large amount, probably the figure is overestimated, it seems to me that this is so, because if it were not so, it would be possible to assume that every second project is a scum. It's not like that. So I do not think that's true.
I am not surprised at all - 46% is even not so much in comparison with 2017 when the majority of ICOs turned out to be the scam. Now, these projects are under control, and fewer fakes appear. I hope, further, the number of good ICOs will grow. |
|
|
|
|
|
Natalim
|
|
August 16, 2018, 01:22:42 PM |
|
46% is a very large amount, probably the figure is overestimated, it seems to me that this is so, because if it were not so, it would be possible to assume that every second project is a scum. It's not like that. So I do not think that's true.
I am not surprised at all - 46% is even not so much in comparison with 2017 when the majority of ICOs turned out to be the scam. Now, these projects are under control, and fewer fakes appear. I hope, further, the number of good ICOs will grow. We can expect that it will grow because more institutional money are entering in the market. Though it cannot be seen in the price but I believe they are just out there waiting for some good news and then bitcoin will moon. |
|
|
|
|
Teraboy
|
|
August 16, 2018, 01:30:00 PM |
|
Maybe it is not only 46% of failing ICO projects? Well if it is really 46% then i guess those ICO who failed should conduct a study on how they can get a project successfully or they should know their weakness and strengths on promoting ICO projects. I do believe that it is also the team who market the project will going to determine its success. The more connections the team has with prospect investors the greater chance that the project will going to succeed. It's more than 46% if we have seen about the fact that there was a lot of died project right now. The very strict competition gives a very difficult situation to the ico without a proper development to survive. I guess it's not having high accuracy and then we should see from the another view. |
|
|
|
|
|
[ProTrader]
|
|
August 16, 2018, 07:17:46 PM |
|
I am not surprise with the statistics because I know that ma you scam ICO will appear later. Since ICO gave no regulation, ICO is now the favorite strategy of scammers to collect money from investors. |
|
|
|
|
|
