46% of last year's ICOs have failed already

[Vasya]

This year is by all accounts a developing level of the ride. a significant number of the ICO are jumping up and numerous likewise demonstrated unsuccessful. with it normally expects financial specialists to take more days in choosing ICO so as not to come up short. require a legitimate investigation of the different sides so as to learn whether the ICO was fruitful or not.

[1715108491]

1715108491

[1715108491]

1715108491

[1715108491]

1715108491

[1715108491]

1715108491

[mksundip]

I see that rarely found sincerity in building a new, high quality platform, they are only oriented to the benefits they will get and sacrifice investor confidence and ignore some regulations

[Senya777]

I have a slightly different statistics, many promising companies that conducted their ICO, have gone into the shadows at the moment. They made a smart move hiding. After a while You will be very glad that you have invested. Remember the story of Steve jobs.Nothing comes as fast as you want. Have patience, gentlemen!

[Downloaded]

https://news.bitcoin.com/46-last-years-icos-failed-already/

• 46% of them are effectively dead already – despite raising over $104 million.
• 902 crowdsales... 142 failed at the funding stage and a further 276 have since failed

We have to admit that the year 2018 was really bad for the ICO. Regularly there were many new and dubious projects that did not even have a ready product, development strategy or own website. It was too obvious that they did not plan to develop. But at the same time, new promising projects appeared that could be beneficial for investment and development of blockchain.

[coinstand]

In the past year, the ICO has experienced many failures and decreased the number of investors and Bounty participants in the ICO. I don't know why this happened, most likely because the ICO was attacked by projects that were scam and a lot of fraud in it which caused investors to be afraid to invest their funds in the ICO.

[littleheart]

There are numerous ICOs given decent and better ventures which don't proceed in light of the fact that there was no monetary help. This ICO can`t built up the changes of their innovation thus "puff" noticeable all around. It would be awful since a large portion of the ICOs have imaginative and modern tasks that if acknowledged would make better enhancements to the network. In this way, we should bolster inventive and better undertakings that we think may encourage the network.

[DmitriySar]

I think that this year statistics will be worse. Because if you invest in something, you must investigate about team, market, business model, competitors and so on. So many people invested in 2017 after first 5 minutes look on the projects, that why so many bad startups and scammers got the money. I think that this year statistics will be worse.

[Ucupers]

Many projects last year failed because they did not have a good product on the market. They are not managed by an experienced team and Manager. And if seen successful ICO is a project on hold by a great team. ICO project and have a very good product, so being able to make a lot of investors are interested.

[idioma1]

Very sad statistics. So many projects failed last time but there are still many worthful projects

[wareck]

https://news.bitcoin.com/46-last-years-icos-failed-already/

• 46% of them are effectively dead already – despite raising over $104 million.
• 902 crowdsales... 142 failed at the funding stage and a further 276 have since failed

Interesting statistics, thanks for the information. But it seems to me that 46% is too small. According to my data, this figure should be about 75%. Although, perhaps, just this year I was so unlucky. Unfortunately, this year for me was not the most successful when working with ICO. But I still believe in this segment, here you can find a useful and profitable project.

[Fedollam]

In a highly competitive environment, it is not surprising that most ICOs fail. Also, the small amount of funds invested by investors is affected.

[manwithsuit909]

https://news.bitcoin.com/46-last-years-icos-failed-already/

• 46% of them are effectively dead already – despite raising over $104 million.
• 902 crowdsales... 142 failed at the funding stage and a further 276 have since failed

what do you think about this ico ,GCOX acm coin ?will it be success?

[dudeguy]

it's an ideal opportunity to quit being astounded by this news. in the event that last year or the prior year ico ventures were a curiosity for most clients, now it is thought to be very common tasks. many individuals chose to make their own undertakings and on account of the way that the organizations that make were very feeble, such figures on dead activities and show up. Be sure. In light of your information, 54% of ICO have been fruitful and are as of now making and growing new innovation and the market for digital money, which is as of now great.

[sinkfish]

i thought i could be high. i guess many more are on borderline. with the market bear for 8 months, not even top 50 coin can take the brunt.

[Jannn]

Honestly I thought it would be more than 46%. Most of the projects that launched last year were completely trash, and if they had been launched this year would have attracted close to $0 funding. At least the market is so harsh now that only the absolute strongest projects can survive, and we'll see a new way wave of ultra HQ projects, just like the venture market.

[Olatunjex]

https://news.bitcoin.com/46-last-years-icos-failed-already/

• 46% of them are effectively dead already – despite raising over $104 million.
• 902 crowdsales... 142 failed at the funding stage and a further 276 have since failed

I think most of the fail because of negative mindset the team had from the starts  which is to scam the noob investors they lack the determination to succeed and you will notice that whenever the raise to amount they are satisfy they stop the sale and they are  where to be found after that.

[Natalim]

https://news.bitcoin.com/46-last-years-icos-failed-already/

• 46% of them are effectively dead already – despite raising over $104 million.
• 902 crowdsales... 142 failed at the funding stage and a further 276 have since failed

I think most of the fail because of negative mindset the team had from the starts  which is to scam the noob investors they lack the determination to succeed and you will notice that whenever the raise to amount they are satisfy they stop the sale and they are  where to be found after that.

Most of the ICOs which raise a good amount of money does not fail.
If they consider those scam ICOs that is obvious from the very beginning then the rate of failed project is really big as it's easy
to conduct an ICO due to the fact that it's not regulated.

[fing ter]

Nowadays many ICOs are launched everyday with the result that there are so many projects in the market. Many of them are fraud projects formed just to scams people. May of them have no idea behind their project, just want to raise money. Actually it has become so easy to start an ICO that even you can also launch it. This is the main reason that why many ICOs are failing.

[lingter34]

This stats are valid as it states that 60% of businesses do not survive and more over, cryptocurrency is very volatile. If developers abandon projects, its going to affect the projects and would warrant it to fail. So many things make projects to fail.

[Jaina]

Yes, there are a lot of scammers inside. The failure rate this year is even higher. This has seriously affected the development of cryptocurrency.