Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 10:48:27 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: What does Quantum Computing mean for Bitcoin?  (Read 23173 times)
binspac
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 27, 2012, 04:23:46 AM
 #101

Quote
The National Security Center is building a highly fortified $2 Billion highly top secret complex simply named the “Utah Data Center” which will soon be home to the Hydrogen bomb of cybersecurity – A 512 Qubit Quantum Computer — which will revitalize the “total information awareness” program originally envisioned by George Bush in 2003.


Why would they be doing this if D-Wave's quantum computers are no more powerful than a cellphone?

Saying they aren't real quantum computers is just disinformation.

Remember when binary computers took up entire rooms? We're at (or past) that state right now with quantum computers.
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714171707
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714171707

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714171707
Reply with quote  #2

1714171707
Report to moderator
MatthewLM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1004


View Profile
June 27, 2012, 07:05:53 PM
 #102

What about NTRU? Apparently no quantum based attack has been found and the keys don't have to be as long as other quantum-safe crytosystems.
punningclan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 283
Merit: 250


Making a better tomorrow, tomorrow.


View Profile
July 03, 2012, 09:55:45 PM
 #103

It probably also means real arbitrary precision and never ending mining even without fees.

It was a cunning plan to have the funny man be the money fan of the punning clan.
1J13NBTKiV8xrAo2dwaD4LhWs3zPobhh5S
runeks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1008



View Profile WWW
July 31, 2012, 04:20:25 PM
 #104

2) A 52 bit hash WILL ALWAYS BE SOLVEABLE in 2^52 operations.  It is mathematically impossible to NOT FIND A SOLUTION in 2^52 operations.  Routinely the bitcoin network takes much longer than 2^52 operations to find a solution.  The reason is the KEYSPACE IS NOT 52 bit.  It is 256 bit AND there just happens to be multiple solutions.
Two messages might produce the same 52 bit hash. There is no guarantee that whichever messages you put into the hash function will not produce the same 52 bit hash. Therefore there is no guarantee that you will find all possible message digests in 2^52 attempts. In fact, with a 52-bit hash function there is a 50% probability that two messages will hash to the same value if you try 2^26 different messages.

Or am I misunderstanding you here D&T?
paulie_w (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 05, 2012, 02:00:33 AM
 #105

http://www.technologyreview.com/news/429429/the-cia-and-jeff-bezos-bet-on-quantum-computing/

interesting.
MysteryMiner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1029


Show middle finger to system and then destroy it!


View Profile
October 05, 2012, 10:05:30 PM
 #106

Quantum computers are like space travels to nearby galaxies - it is fun talking about them and researching possibilities, but it will not happen tomorrow or next year. Worrying that Bitcoin or asymmetric cryptography will became useless because of Quantum computers is like being afraid of alien invasion.

bc1q59y5jp2rrwgxuekc8kjk6s8k2es73uawprre4j
Littleshop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1003



View Profile WWW
October 05, 2012, 10:09:58 PM
 #107

Quote
The National Security Center is building a highly fortified $2 Billion highly top secret complex simply named the “Utah Data Center” which will soon be home to the Hydrogen bomb of cybersecurity – A 512 Qubit Quantum Computer — which will revitalize the “total information awareness” program originally envisioned by George Bush in 2003.


Why would they be doing this if D-Wave's quantum computers are no more powerful than a cellphone?

Saying they aren't real quantum computers is just disinformation.

Remember when binary computers took up entire rooms? We're at (or past) that state right now with quantum computers.

No, because when the binary computer took up an entire room, it was in actuality a binary computer as represented.

Scientists in the field say that the D-wave machine is NOT a quantum computer at all. 

kwoody
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 454
Merit: 250


Technology and Women. Amazing.


View Profile
October 06, 2012, 05:45:52 AM
 #108

Quantum computing makes me believe that in some alternate universe, I'm filthy fucking rich smoking blunts and surrounded by bitches all day every day. It also makes me believe that in another alternate universe, I've committed suicide by slitting my throat with a dull edgeless spoon.

Oh right, Bitcoin.
Bitcoin exists, is the global reserve currency, and hasn't been invented yet.
Bitcoin doesn't exist, Satoshi was declared dead upon childbirth, and the Bildeburgs are a homeless poor family of Ethiopians.
Pick one.
grondilu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1076


View Profile
October 06, 2012, 01:33:48 PM
 #109

Quantum computing makes me believe that in some alternate universe, I'm filthy fucking rich smoking blunts and surrounded by bitches all day every day. It also makes me believe that in another alternate universe, I've committed suicide by slitting my throat with a dull edgeless spoon.

Reminds me of a physicist joke about Everett's interpretation of QM:

«
- According to Everett, there is a universe in which Sarah Palin is president of the United-States?
- Well you know, it has to be compatible with the laws of physics.
»

TheBible
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 125
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 06, 2012, 10:51:30 PM
 #110

It will mean you still can't buy anything with bitcoin.
Westy96
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 17, 2021, 11:45:48 AM
 #111

I think this issue will bear down on us sooner than expected. I would be interested to hear thoughts on how the change to the algorithms could be implemented, as surely without an automated solution it would be a huge threat to ask users to manually migrate to a more secure wallet for example. A smooth and seamless update to the network is the answer, but can it be done?

Imagine if one day Satoshi's coins move and we do not have a solution in place.   
matjas
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 115



View Profile
February 17, 2021, 12:25:54 PM
 #112

Depends if we see a slow integration where every system will be able to migrate and adapt to QC, then there wouldnt be such a problem to switch to QC mining. The real threat is if governments (or some rich corporations) are building it in secret and will have a huge advantage over majority of current systems. 

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!