VOTE! Do you participate in ICO that requires KYC (your personal data)?

[Jekbolt]

The pall had been transferred to POLL thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3105224.new#new

[1715083578]

1715083578

[1715083578]

1715083578

[Nagricoin]

Depend from the project.
Mostly - yes. But I bought REDL tokens (Red Lantern ICO) and I don't want give personal data for this project) Because they promise me that I will be anonymous

[btccrusher]

It depends on the project and the calculation of my profit. If I see there is a significant chance of winning in the market, then I don't the KYC.  Otherways I ignore those poor quality project with KYC.

[gazilla]

Yes I do, and do not see this as a problem, as usually they only require your passport, and if I am willing to trust them with my money, why wouldn’t I trust them with my passport.

[Faeton]

If I see in the joining campaign that the team does not exclude the KYC verification for the signatory campaign participants, then irrespective of whether the ICO project is promising or not, I am fundamentally not joining this campaign. I believe that the ICO team does not have the right to require signature campaign participants to undergo such a check, since such a check is made for investors to exclude possible investment by means obtained illegally. Participants in the signature campaign are not investors and therefore there is no sense in requiring them to provide identification information and copies of passports.