cuddlefish


July 19, 2011, 09:17:30 AM 

For each 0.025 BTC that shows up at 1NFXQfoqGJBNuEXMSYJwUYGt5bJF6jbFrg past the date of this post, I will reveal a random digit (as shown by Python's random.randint(), seeded with the post number.) of the key.
It's in PEM format.
BEGIN EC PRIVATE KEY **************************************************************** ****************/*********************************************** ******************************== END EC PRIVATE KEY
As an extra wrinkle, I'll give you the sha256 hash of the private key, for your bruteforcing pleasure.
>>> hashlib.sha256(data).hexdigest() '0d2c8b5e5aa8ed0b2c10ad8d0940ee24e5df5e48160fe09b31efeaa8e72f6083'
This is the hash of ONLY the inner part (not BEGIN EC PRIVATE KEY or END EC PRIVATE KEY) There are no newlines at the ends, only between lines.







Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.

cuddlefish


July 19, 2011, 09:18:47 AM 

Oh, the address with the 5 BTC is 1HqtKWKCLTs4eUuvTDPpJC4AaBYMiiXWok





cuddlefish


July 20, 2011, 05:22:09 AM 

>>> random.seed(3) >>> for i in range(4): print random.randint(1, len(data)) ... 39 89 60 98 >>> for i in range(4): print r[random.randint(1, len(data))] ... f 7 C 0




anthony_


July 20, 2011, 06:49:59 AM 

>>> random.seed(3) >>> for i in range(4): print random.randint(1, len(data)) ... 39 89 60 98 >>> for i in range(4): print r[random.randint(1, len(data))] ... f 7 C 0 from that output it doesn't show that you type random.seed the second time, so it would have continued from the last point in the PRNG and the f 7 C 0 would be wrong




Maged
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260


July 20, 2011, 07:11:54 AM 

>>> random.seed(3) >>> for i in range(4): print random.randint(1, len(data)) ... 39 89 60 98 >>> for i in range(4): print r[random.randint(1, len(data))] ... f 7 C 0 from that output it doesn't show that you type random.seed the second time, so it would have continued from the last point in the PRNG and the f 7 C 0 would be wrong If that's true, then this should be the correct assignment... >>> random.seed(3) >>> for i in range(4): print random.randint(1, 162) ... 39 89 60 98 >>> for i in range(4): print random.randint(1, 162) ... 102 11 3 136




cuddlefish


July 20, 2011, 02:19:23 PM 

Ooops.
>>> random.seed(3) >>> for i in range(4): e = random.randint(1, len(r)); print e; print r[e1] ... 39 e 89 4 60 B 98 4 >>>




anthony_


July 20, 2011, 08:49:17 PM 

Ooops.
>>> random.seed(3) >>> for i in range(4): e = random.randint(1, len(r)); print e; print r[e1] ... 39 e 89 4 60 B 98 4 >>>
it appears we get the first 8 digits then =P




cuddlefish


July 21, 2011, 02:14:27 AM 

Ooops.
>>> random.seed(3) >>> for i in range(4): e = random.randint(1, len(r)); print e; print r[e1] ... 39 e 89 4 60 B 98 4 >>>
it appears we get the first 8 digits then =P No, those are the 0indexed positions.




anthony_


July 21, 2011, 05:05:23 AM 

Ooops.
>>> random.seed(3) >>> for i in range(4): e = random.randint(1, len(r)); print e; print r[e1] ... 39 e 89 4 60 B 98 4 >>>
it appears we get the first 8 digits then =P No, those are the 0indexed positions. We already got the next 4 numbers for that seed aswell is what i'm saying




mc_lovin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
www.bitcointrading.com


July 21, 2011, 09:06:22 PM 

interesting little game.




