Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 10:17:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: W3C has been the biggest fucking joke for over 20 years! Here is why...  (Read 158 times)
RawDog (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1026



View Profile WWW
February 26, 2018, 02:50:00 PM
 #1

lol -
https://www.coindesk.com/w3c-vets-forego-ico-government-friendly-blockchain-launch/

This guy Sporney - what a joke.  He makes a blockchain without a token.  Hey Sporny - all that means is that you don't understand what a blockchain is!!!!  Typical W3C bullshit!!!  Since Tim Berners Lee claims to have invented the Internet (total moron) - W3C has been the joke of the industry.  Now they want to get into blockchain.  

Sporny - go ask Andreas Antonopolis why you can't have a blockchain without a value token.  Dipshit.  W3C is just embarrassing.  Their understanding of Internet and computer science has been laughable for over 2 decades.  Still keeping me laughing today.

btw - Tim Berners Lee didn't invent the internet.  He didn't even invent the hyperlink.  All he did is proposed a general encoding of the hyperlink - that became popular and that was a stupid subnet called www.  Now he runs around doing interviews saying he is the 'father of the internet'.  What a dick.  Takes enormous credit for doing almost nothing.  Maybe he should find out who Vint Cerf is.  Dumbass Lee and W3C are ridiculous.  

*Image Removed* *Expletive Removed*  *Obsenity Removed*
What's going on - Slavetards?!!!
Watch my videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE43M1Z8Iew  1FuckYouc6zrtHbnqcHdhrSVhcxgpJgfds
emuLOAD
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 328
Merit: 252


View Profile
February 26, 2018, 03:07:30 PM
 #2

When did Lee ever claim he invented the internet? O_o don't make things up... He at worst claims he is the father of the world wide web, which he "is". And you might not realize the importance that had on today's world. before, communities were very different.

Blockchain technology at its core is a distributed database, it does not imply nor require the existance of a "token" (or coin per se). If they want to try such a system, where is the harm?
RawDog (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1026



View Profile WWW
February 26, 2018, 03:42:44 PM
 #3

When did Lee ever claim he invented the internet? O_o don't make things up... He at worst claims he is the father of the world wide web, which he "is". And you might not realize the importance that had on today's world. before, communities were very different.

Blockchain technology at its core is a distributed database, it does not imply nor require the existance of a "token" (or coin per se). If they want to try such a system, where is the harm?

"it does not imply nor require the existance of a "token"  - clearly you don't understand what a blockchain is either.  

Lee very often claims to be the father if the internet - and stands by silently when journalists mistakely call him the inventor of the internet.  He is total bullshit.  www was merely an implied agreement that <a href=""></a> would encode the hyperlink on that portion of the Internet.  It is the smallest dumbest advance and contribution to the entire picture.  He did almost nothing.  He takes credit for the whole thing.  

W3C pissed their britches when Microsoft wouldn't follow their rules for browser definition when Microsoft introduced Internet Explorer.  W3C has been working for more than 10 years for in browser payments - only to get smoked by bitcoin.  Now, they want to experiment with blockchain without a fundamental understanding why the token can't be severed from the chain?  Hahahahahah!  They proved they are morons again.  But I agree with you, there is no harm in them proving they are stupid yet again.  Let them try such a system.

By the way, "Blockchain technology at its core is a distributed database" - this is incorrect.  Blockchain is more precisely distributed concensus.  Without the token, the concensus become meaningless. Nearly every database that ever was is a far better database than blockchain.  Except for the concensus part.  That is the key.  W3C will have a very shitty database - with no consensus mechanism.  Don't worry, they have been working on meaningless broken shit since they were formed. 

*Image Removed* *Expletive Removed*  *Obsenity Removed*
What's going on - Slavetards?!!!
Watch my videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE43M1Z8Iew  1FuckYouc6zrtHbnqcHdhrSVhcxgpJgfds
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!