Bitcoin Forum
July 18, 2019, 08:16:11 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2018-02-27] Making Peace with Crypto's Capacity for Evil  (Read 42 times)
cybersofts
Copper Member
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 284



View Profile
February 27, 2018, 01:07:47 PM
 #1

Making Peace with Crypto's Capacity for Evil




If Venezuela's oil-backed cryptocurrency succeeds - and that's still a big if - it could portend a whole new use case for the technology: fundraising for rogue states.

The world may just have to live with that.

One of the defining aspects of cryptocurrency is neutrality. Bitcoin, ethereum and the like are open networks. They don't discriminate.

A public blockchain doesn't care if you're a Boy Scout or a convicted ax murderer. As long as you control the private keys to a bitcoin wallet, you control the funds in it, no passport required. (Setting up an account at a crypto exchange is a different matter.)

That is financial inclusion, in the truest sense, though it's not exactly what policy wonks have in mind when they use the term.

Similarly, as long as you know how to code, you can contribute or build applications on top of bitcoin or ethereum, no Ivy League degree needed.

That is permissionless innovation. It's what allowed Sir Tim Berners-Lee to create the world wide web and Satoshi Nakamoto to invent bitcoin.

And now it may allow Venezuela's strongman president, Nicolas Maduro, to eat many more empanadas at his desk, and do who knows what else, as his nation reels from an economic crisis.


A nebulous plan

Stepping back, last week Maduro's government claimed it had raised $735 million on the first day of a pre-sale of its cryptographic token, known as the petro, and revealed a number of other details about the project. Much remains unclear, including which network the coin will run on top of - some public documents say it's NEM, others say ethereum.

The coins are ostensibly backed by the country's oil reserves, with their value somehow pegged to the previous day's price per barrel in bolivars (so much for real-time). They'll be legal tender and accepted for tax payments in Venezuela, according to the government, so in theory there's a use case for local residents.

Still, it's hard to see any value proposition for outside investors in a token that's controlled by a dictatorship. You could even argue that such a centralized set-up disqualifies the petro from being called a cryptocurrency in the first place.

But, imagine for a moment that this scheme works. It could be an encouraging sign for other authoritarian regimes that have been cut off from the global financial system by economic sanctions. Already, Venezuelan officials have met with their Russian counterparts to discuss the petro, and, late last week, Iran revealed its own cryptocurrency plans.

Now, it's one thing for individuals or small business owners to use cryptocurrency to circumvent international sanctions. In such cases, it's easy to root for the underdog, even when members of the Washington foreign policy establishment clutch their pearls. God forbid an Iranian shoemaker should be able to sell handmade footwear on the internet! Who's in charge of this "bitcoin" anyway? Don't they know financial intermediaries have a Responsibility to Society to make sure the shoemaker's children starve? Why, for all we know, that merchant could be funding terrorism ... one pair of wingtips at a time!

The recent sanctions-skirting crypto projects, however, would enrich, not the citizens of these countries, but the repressive governments responsible for their pariah status. Which, as crypto critic Preston Byrne wryly noted on Twitter, doesn't match up with the tech's early libertarian rhetoric.

- @prestonjbyrne | https://twitter.com/prestonjbyrne/status/966308776289685504

That's the thing about open-source technology and permissionless networks, though. Not only can the tools fall into the wrong hands - the very idea of "wrong hands" is foreign.


Choke points


For an illustration, let's take a quick detour to the U.S., where the latest mass shooting has made firearms a hot-button political issue. In a recent op-ed in the New York Times, Andrew Ross Sorkin argues that if Washington won't put stricter controls on gun sellers, the nation's financial institutions should do so, for instance by refusing to do business with retailers that sell assault weapons.

This paternalistic idea would set a dangerous precedent, as my former colleague, American Banker editor-in-chief Rob Blackwell, warned in a response to Sorkin. But it's also a helpful reminder of what sets apart cryptocurrency from the legacy financial system.

Bitcoin doesn't know or care what the purpose of a transaction is. Nodes and miners, blind to the identities behind alphanumeric addresses, can't be shamed by the Andrew Ross Sorkins of the world into trying to control human behavior. That's one of the main reasons bitcoin has value.

Is this good or bad? You tell me, is fire good or bad? This much is clear: if banks took Sorkin's advice and tried to choke off gun sales, bitcoin would probably rally.

Then there's the alleged "Nazi problem." You've probably read about how extremist platforms like the Daily Stormer, shunned by mainstream payment processors, have turned to cryptocurrency as an alternative means to accept donations, and apparently got rich in the recent run-up.

It goes without saying that these organizations' words and ideas are despicable. But as long as they're just words and ideas, not violent or criminal actions, what purpose did it serve to cut off their access to credit card payments?

As free-speech advocates will tell you, the antidote to bad speech is not suppression, but more speech. Blackballing speakers you or I find offensive from financial services opens the door for banking to be weaponized against others that you or I may support.

Fortunately, the existence of cryptocurrency blunts this weapon. Today it's the neo-Nazis taking advantage of bitcoin's neutrality, but tomorrow it may be [insert a publisher dear to your heart] who needs it. You'll thank Satoshi when that happens.

Returning to Venezuela, western governments could try to thwart the petro, or its Russian or Iranian equivalents, by, say, forbidding licensed exchanges to list the tokens or by blacklisting ethereum ERC-20 addresses that receive the tokens. (No airdrops, please!) But to the extent these projects really do function like cryptocurrencies, shutting them down may be impossible.

That's the hyperconnected world we live in today. Buckle up, buckaroos.


Source: https://www.coindesk.com/making-peace-cryptos-capacity-evil/
1563437771
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563437771

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563437771
Reply with quote  #2

1563437771
Report to moderator
1563437771
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563437771

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563437771
Reply with quote  #2

1563437771
Report to moderator
1563437771
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563437771

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563437771
Reply with quote  #2

1563437771
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1563437771
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563437771

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563437771
Reply with quote  #2

1563437771
Report to moderator
1563437771
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563437771

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563437771
Reply with quote  #2

1563437771
Report to moderator
data_teks
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 267
Merit: 101



View Profile
February 27, 2018, 02:16:57 PM
 #2

Man com one a u seriously ?

U spamming news so much . 80% of news here post by U !

Why u did so much ? U dont fer that moderators will ban u for spamming news ?
Or u bounty programm pay u alot fo that ? Smiley
aso118
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1012


★Nitrogensports.eu★


View Profile
February 27, 2018, 07:35:32 PM
 #3

Should the title be crypto’s capacity for evil or the other way around? Financial institutions play an important role in the world’s strategy to squeeze crime and cryptos could render them toothless. That might be a good thing as the world will start looking at other strategies. Maybe what is required is diplomacy in Venezuela, not financial blackmail.


           █████████████████     ████████
          █████████████████     ████████
         █████████████████     ████████
        █████████████████     ████████
       ████████              ████████
      ████████              ████████
     ████████     ███████  ████████     ████████
    ████████     █████████████████     ████████
   ████████     █████████████████     ████████
  ████████     █████████████████     ████████
 ████████     █████████████████     ████████
████████     ████████  ███████     ████████
            ████████              ████████
           ████████              ████████
          ████████     █████████████████
         ████████     █████████████████
        ████████     █████████████████
       ████████     █████████████████
▄▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██     
██
██
▬▬ THE LARGEST & MOST TRUSTED ▬▬
      BITCOIN SPORTSBOOK     
   ▄▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██     
██
██
             ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▄
     ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀        ▀▄▄▄▄           
▄▀▀▀▀                 █   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
█                    ▀▄          █
 █   ▀▌     ██▄        █          █               
 ▀▄        ▐████▄       █        █
  █        ███████▄     ▀▄       █
   █      ▐████▄█████████████████████▄
   ▀▄     ███████▀                  ▀██
    █      ▀█████    ▄▄        ▄▄    ██
     █       ▀███   ████      ████   ██
     ▀▄        ██    ▀▀        ▀▀    ██
      █        ██        ▄██▄        ██
       █       ██        ▀██▀        ██
       ▀▄      ██    ▄▄        ▄▄    ██
        █      ██   ████      ████   ██
         █▄▄▄▄▀██    ▀▀        ▀▀    ██
               ██▄                  ▄██
                ▀████████████████████▀




  CASINO  ●  DICE  ●  POKER   
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
   24 hour Customer Support   

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Qartersa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 535


View Profile
February 28, 2018, 07:11:34 AM
 #4

Unlike with fiat currency which is heavily regulated by governments through central banks, I still think both cryptos and fiat have capacity to be perpetrated by evil because of people who use and abuse its use. There is no innovation that is not used as a means to create evil because people with bad ulterior motives will always find ways to circumvent laws in furtherance of their cause. Hence, in every innovation, we have to have the capacity to make peace with their capacity for evil. So you see at this point, you have to understand we cannot just blame the innovation, the technology, the invention, and all others that is aimed at serving people which is at par with times. It is the PEOPLE who should be held accountable for their actions, omissions, culpable negligence, and whatnot. Otherwise stated, you do not blame the object; you can only blame the subject.
CryptoBry
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 302



View Profile
February 28, 2018, 08:25:08 AM
 #5

There is no doubt that cryptocurrency can be used for any purpose including killing all human and all animal lives on this planet...because cryptocurrency has no mind of its own it is a  tool and being a tool anybody whether a demon or a saint can have access to it. Should we stop it because there are evil people using the technology? No. Because for every one evil there are 99 others who are not and they are using the same technology. Sacrificing the 99 because of 1 can be the best form of insanity.

To be very fair, the American Dollar (and any fiat money for that matter) have been and being used for evil purposes., Dollar has been used to buy chemicals sprayed on Syrians. The same dollar was used in buying equipment and other materials in making bombs which exploded in many parts of the world.

So was there anyone who advocated for the control and elimination of the dollar? Nobody because that would be insane. What we do with the tool or a technology is not the problem of the tool or the technology...the problem lies with the user. And in an evil world this is a big reality we have to contend with. Make peace with this reality and then we can start solving the problem.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!