What criteria do you use to analyze ICOs?

[Baimovic]

Good thinking, but I usually to see team, allocation, sales prospects and manager.

A good ICO has an active teamn looking for investors, then a minimum of $ 500,000 allocation, and also do not forget to choosing a manager.

because a good ICO, usually will choose a manager who has positif trust

[jomvill]

Comparing ICO's can be beneficial to both cryptocurrency investors as well as the ICO .... People's opinions about different project may be used as a base.

[BaeNaNa]

Project vision and the team are the most important things to me, it's good if the project is trying to solve a new problem instead of copying others and the team must have a decent background in order to convince me that they can run the project as they've stated in their roadmap. I also care about the hardcap because it's not good to collect too much money.

[klser]

First of all it's an idea and mission of project. Secondly, it's a team and advisor, whether they had pevious ICO success. I always read information about team.

[mariayaz]

I look in what sector the project is working, what are the features and need of the project, team and popularity of project.

[Bay_Harbour_Butcher]

this depends on the individual each look, but I think personally, a good ico can be seen from the idea of the project and the most important is the hype of the community, if crowded then most likely many investors will be interested as well

[moonriver]

Hey guys, I am trying to develop a model to price and score ICOs. I believe this model can potentially help a lot of people. By developing a model that is as objective as possible, I can start to accurately rank and score ICOs. This will help to weed through all of the scams and junk out there. I just wanted to know what are some objective criteria that you use???

The things I can think of so far.

Team- Various objective criteria
Coin- Various objective data like hard cap and discount
Vision- What needs are the project solving
Project Value- which blockchain, status of product, alpha, beta stage etc..
Concerns- competiton
etc...

I appreciate any input! Thanks

My advice is don't over emphasize Team.
Some projects have all star teams, but their token economy is ridiculous, which makes it uninvestable.

[Spiero7]

For me I think first and foremost thing to put into consideration is the relevance of the project in solving the immediate and future problems of people cos the projection of the entire blockchain technology is to make the world a better place to live. Second, the team behind the project is as important as the project, cos its the ideas, plans and hardwork of the team will result into the success of the project. Lastly I think community support is also a key factor to consider also.

[AlexaSonda]

The first thing I see is their development team, whether they are active to always answer investor questions or not. I also often check the enthusiasm of investors in their telegram group.

If you are looking for ico, look at the effect.ai, token sale stage 2 is now live and if you are interested take some time to research it.

[sujonali1819]

Hey guys, I am trying to develop a model to price and score ICOs. I believe this model can potentially help a lot of people. By developing a model that is as objective as possible, I can start to accurately rank and score ICOs. This will help to weed through all of the scams and junk out there. I just wanted to know what are some objective criteria that you use???

It is a good enterprise that helps people to identify the best ico's.In my opinion Team and the mission of the project is more important for a project. If a team will be more active and constantly work on their project I think it will be big ico .

[klebsiella]

It is very helpful to check facts such as:
1. Whitepaper- contains the important information regarding the upcoming project and ICO. What are the problems that this project is going to solve?
2. Token- What is the token for? When and How will it be distributed?
3. The team- Who are the team members? What are their experiences in crypto? The projects they have been involved and the impact?
4.  ANN Thread of this forum- Bitcointalk is the biggest forum for Bitcoin and other cryptos.

[gandhe83]

The standard I use for analyzing the ICO is what is the team that formed the project, the project team and the content of the project. A potential ICO project will be a project founded on experienced people who have breakthrough ideas that can appeal to everyone. I think this is the standard for my analysis of ICO projects

[stefany101]

Take note : I am not an investor but as a bounty hunterthe criteria i always check before partipating in a bounty campaigns are : How much is the total allocation of the bounties from the total supply ?, the one who is managing their ann thread in the forum, the platform/s where it is going to be listed or partnered with, the team and the developers behind the creation of their projects, and lastly, i always check their social media sites whether they are updated or not, if not i will going to quit in their bounty campaigns right away.

[suburban123]

The basis of choice is a fundamental analysis. If you decide to engage in fundamental analysis, as a result, you will have your own set of rules for decision-making. Do not try to get a ready algorithm or a rigid scheme. This is not science, but, rather, art. As for my personal experience, there is nothing more important than the aspect of communication. The most reliable way is to look at how the developer builds communication with potential investors. Is he professional enough in the field of his proposal.

[sultanali]

Normally what I do is I read their Whitepaper. Because by reading the whitepaper we get the whole idea about the project and we get all the information in the Whitepaper. Like Technical Details, Legal Information, Team Information and Road Map so all in one. So its better to read the Whitepaper and you will get the whole Idea about the ICO.

[btc-facebook]

The standard I use for analyzing the ICO is what is the team that formed the project, the project team and the content of the project. A potential ICO project will be a project founded on experienced people who have breakthrough ideas that can appeal to everyone. I think this is the standard for my analysis of ICO projects

Sometimes it can be fake !
I have my own local coin that they using parliamentarian as their team that form the project.
After reporter confirm this, that parliamentarian has not join any cryptocurrency project because he against bitcoin.

Of course the project want build their reputation in haste so they include parliamentarian on their team !

[puremage111]

Hey guys, I am trying to develop a model to price and score ICOs. I believe this model can potentially help a lot of people. By developing a model that is as objective as possible, I can start to accurately rank and score ICOs. This will help to weed through all of the scams and junk out there. I just wanted to know what are some objective criteria that you use???

The things I can think of so far.

Team- Various objective criteria
Coin- Various objective data like hard cap and discount
Vision- What needs are the project solving
Project Value- which blockchain, status of product, alpha, beta stage etc..
Concerns- competiton
etc...

I appreciate any input! Thanks

Among all these, i would believe that

Team- Various objective criteria
Coin- Various objective data like hard cap and discount
Vision- What needs are the project solving
Project Value- which blockchain, status of product, alpha, beta stage etc..
Concerns- competiton
etc...

I am more towards possibility of success and how far it can go
First of all
Team is kinda important because you can see if their background is just Business based or they are some Technology enthusiast.
Next, Hardcap is one of my concern because i would prefer coins with lower HCap because IMO they don't need that much
Vision must be reliable and realistic
Finally, Blockchain selected is important because each have different pros and cons in terms of scaling, framework and structure

[GrandBcn]

I attach great importance to the usefulness of the project. If, in my opinion, the idea repeats itself, or it is absolutely utopian or useless, I pass by. Project estimates are also important. The higher the rating of people who are engaged in scrupulous analysis, the greater the confidence in the product.

[Imfinnabeon]

I don't use criteria anymore, and that isn't because I hop into every ICO. To me if the coin actually is a viable solution to what we have now, how come we can't airdrop and build a community around it? I prefer this method of distribution, and see no need for ICOs other than grabbing money from newbies.

[dashunka]

my model is:
 the purpose of the project;
 the decision of the put purposes;
 command;
 alpha and beta versions of the project;
and probably the main means for implementation.