Bitcoin Forum
May 30, 2024, 02:03:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [CLOSED]R6: KnC Jupiter,BELOW COST+HOST, $78 +Bonuses. Hashing, 1st payouts sent  (Read 14824 times)
firsttimeuser
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 122
Merit: 100



View Profile
November 01, 2013, 12:15:46 AM
 #161

Have no idea. Restart QT?
-Redacted-
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 501


View Profile
November 01, 2013, 12:21:33 AM
 #162

Did that - doesn't seem to change anything...    It still shows the money spent, but the transaction sending it doesn't seem to exist...

I'll let it go overnight.  If it doesn't clear by in the morning, I'll try contacting the Bitcoin-QT developers to see if they can figure out what happened...
firsttimeuser
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 122
Merit: 100



View Profile
November 01, 2013, 12:35:34 AM
 #163

It's there now Wink
-Redacted-
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 501


View Profile
November 01, 2013, 12:39:52 AM
 #164

That was a scary thing to have happen....   Shocked
firsttimeuser
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 122
Merit: 100



View Profile
November 01, 2013, 12:57:33 AM
 #165

That was a scary thing to have happen....   Shocked
Once I was waiting 12 hours for first confirmation
wontons
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 03:51:08 AM
 #166

Is worker 1 down?  showing 0 hash via the mootinator plugin...Am I the only one who obsessively watches the stats page?
-Redacted-
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 501


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 02:23:36 PM
 #167

It looks like there was a short blip.  It's not noticeable at all on the daily charts, but it had to be under an hour since it didn't hit zero on an hourly chart.  I would guess that someone at the hosting facility noticed the hashrate drop and rebooted the Jupiter.

bobsag3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500

Owner, Minersource.net


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 04:16:55 PM
 #168

It looks like there was a short blip.  It's not noticeable at all on the daily charts, but it had to be under an hour since it didn't hit zero on an hourly chart.  I would guess that someone at the hosting facility noticed the hashrate drop and rebooted the Jupiter.


I was SSH'ed into the box and watched the cgminer crash. It seems like Box #2 needs to be rebooted every 48 hours.
-Redacted-
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 501


View Profile
November 06, 2013, 05:18:29 PM
Last edit: November 07, 2013, 02:44:11 PM by -Redacted-
 #169

I'll build a cron job tonight that automatically reboots a KnC box at midnight and test it on my Saturn since it seems to have the same kind f problem.  Once I'm sure it's working properly we can implement that on box-2.  I wonder if this is being caused by some sort of memory leak in that version of cgminer?

I heard rumors of a .98.1 release being tested by various people, but I haven't kept up with the KnC news lately so I don't know if that was made official yet or not.

EDIT:

The linux operating system that KnC uses doesn't have crontab available....   Ugh...
-Redacted-
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 501


View Profile
November 07, 2013, 02:43:17 PM
Last edit: November 07, 2013, 02:59:16 PM by -Redacted-
 #170

In USD terms, we're at about +5% ROI.   I wonder if we'll see Bitcoin at $300 next week?  w00t !!

The next payout is scheduled for Friday November 15th.  That will be the first payout that hosting fees will need to come out of.  And speaking of hosting fees, I need to call a vote on making a correction to the original terms of the GB which states that hosting fees are 2.75%.

The problem here is that hosting costs are in USD, not BTC, and the electricity, internet, rent, utilities, maintenance fees, and all the other hosting expenses need to be paid in USD.  In US Dollar terms, the hosting fee is $200 per month, or $100 every payout.  (That's a special GB reduction from the original $220 per month that I originally paid for hosting.)  

This amount is almost 50% less than KnC charges for hosting, and about 30% less than CoinTerra plans to charge for hosting.   In short, it's a very good deal at $200 per month.  Paid this way we can continue operating the machines until they aren't mining approximately 0.3 BTC every two weeks - probably well into next year.  

On the other hand, as difficulty rises, 2.75% probably won't cover the hosting costs past the next payout - it drops below the cost of hosting when the machines don't return at least 11 BTC every two weeks.  So, the bottom line is this, either we modify the original 2.75% terms to be $200 per month, or we have to shut down the machines much earlier than we really need to.

I vote my 5 shares of R5 and R6 for modifying the terms of the GB to change the 2.75% to be $200 per month so we can continue hashing longer.  

Votes, please?
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4144
Merit: 7955


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
November 07, 2013, 03:27:40 PM
 #171

In USD terms, we're at about +5% ROI.   I wonder if we'll see Bitcoin at $300 next week?  w00t !!

The next payout is scheduled for Friday November 15th.  That will be the first payout that hosting fees will need to come out of.  And speaking of hosting fees, I need to call a vote on making a correction to the original terms of the GB which states that hosting fees are 2.75%.

The problem here is that hosting costs are in USD, not BTC, and the electricity, internet, rent, utilities, maintenance fees, and all the other hosting expenses need to be paid in USD.  In US Dollar terms, the hosting fee is $200 per month, or $100 every payout.  (That's a special GB reduction from the original $220 per month that I originally paid for hosting.)  

This amount is almost 50% less than KnC charges for hosting, and about 30% less than CoinTerra plans to charge for hosting.   In short, it's a very good deal at $200 per month.  Paid this way we can continue operating the machines until they aren't mining approximately 0.3 BTC every two weeks - probably well into next year.  

On the other hand, as difficulty rises, 2.75% probably won't cover the hosting costs past the next payout - it drops below the cost of hosting when the machines don't return at least 11 BTC every two weeks.  So, the bottom line is this, either we modify the original 2.75% terms to be $200 per month, or we have to shut down the machines much earlier than we really need to.

I vote my 5 shares of R5 and R6 for modifying the terms of the GB to change the 2.75% to be $200 per month so we can continue hashing longer.  

Votes, please?


Okay  I would want this. basing it all on usd works for me. 

   Now is 200 for 1 machine or both.   

next question.  Any one cash in some coins lately ?

  I got 235 usd for .81 btc today!!
  I got 201  usd   for .77 btc yesterday!!

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
Tiennou74
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 07, 2013, 03:33:38 PM
 #172

I vote for modifying the terms so we can keep hashing.
I also see people reselling Knc miners for 7000-8500, this could be a nice ROI option if the difficulty kept rising and btc stalled (right now it is up to $316!)
bobsag3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500

Owner, Minersource.net


View Profile
November 07, 2013, 03:46:02 PM
 #173

In USD terms, we're at about +5% ROI.   I wonder if we'll see Bitcoin at $300 next week?  w00t !!

The next payout is scheduled for Friday November 15th.  That will be the first payout that hosting fees will need to come out of.  And speaking of hosting fees, I need to call a vote on making a correction to the original terms of the GB which states that hosting fees are 2.75%.

The problem here is that hosting costs are in USD, not BTC, and the electricity, internet, rent, utilities, maintenance fees, and all the other hosting expenses need to be paid in USD.  In US Dollar terms, the hosting fee is $200 per month, or $100 every payout.  (That's a special GB reduction from the original $220 per month that I originally paid for hosting.)  

This amount is almost 50% less than KnC charges for hosting, and about 30% less than CoinTerra plans to charge for hosting.   In short, it's a very good deal at $200 per month.  Paid this way we can continue operating the machines until they aren't mining approximately 0.3 BTC every two weeks - probably well into next year.  

On the other hand, as difficulty rises, 2.75% probably won't cover the hosting costs past the next payout - it drops below the cost of hosting when the machines don't return at least 11 BTC every two weeks.  So, the bottom line is this, either we modify the original 2.75% terms to be $200 per month, or we have to shut down the machines much earlier than we really need to.

I vote my 5 shares of R5 and R6 for modifying the terms of the GB to change the 2.75% to be $200 per month so we can continue hashing longer.  

Votes, please?


Okay  I would want this. basing it all on usd works for me. 

   Now is 200 for 1 machine or both.   

next question.  Any one cash in some coins lately ?

  I got 235 usd for .81 btc today!!
  I got 201  usd   for .77 btc yesterday!!

Cashed out ~40BTC to pay costs and the metric ton of PSUs I ordered.
-Redacted-
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 501


View Profile
November 07, 2013, 03:46:11 PM
 #174

You have to love the value of BTC lately  Shocked

The hosting fees are charged per machine, so $200 per month per machine.  The $100 fee every-two-weeks for hosting each GB machine would be calculated in BTC at the time I do the payouts.  With BTC at $318, that's less than 0.3 BTC for each.
mootinator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 274
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 07, 2013, 07:52:18 PM
 #175

You have to love the value of BTC lately  Shocked

The hosting fees are charged per machine, so $200 per month per machine.  The $100 fee every-two-weeks for hosting each GB machine would be calculated in BTC at the time I do the payouts.  With BTC at $318, that's less than 0.3 BTC for each.

Sure, I'll vote my 3 shares to pay fees in fiat, assuming I understand what we're voting for.

No
mootinator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 274
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 07, 2013, 07:54:38 PM
 #176


next question.  Any one cash in some coins lately ?

  I got 235 usd for .81 btc today!!
  I got 201  usd   for .77 btc yesterday!!

I'm not converting any of my bitcoins into fiat until other people have tested the taxation consequences of doing so Tongue

No
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4144
Merit: 7955


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
November 15, 2013, 05:47:17 AM
 #177

can we lock this r6 and lock r5 then do a r5 +r6 like we did with r9,10,11,12??



oh  one more question paying this and r5  tonight?

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
DyslexicZombei (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 15, 2013, 07:24:34 AM
 #178

can we lock this r6 and lock r5 then do a r5 +r6 like we did with r9,10,11,12??



oh  one more question paying this and r5  tonight?

Good point Philip.

Locking both threads and starting an R5-R6 combined discussion thread.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!